Literature DB >> 34759236

A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Real-time Risk of Intraoperative Hypotension in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Shara I Feld1, Daniel S Hippe, Ljubomir Miljacic, Nayak L Polissar, Shu-Fang Newman, Bala G Nair, Monica S Vavilala.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability. Episodes of hypotension are associated with worse TBI outcomes. Our aim was to model the real-time risk of intraoperative hypotension in TBI patients, compare machine learning and traditional modeling techniques, and identify key contributory features from the patient monitor and medical record for the prediction of intraoperative hypotension.
METHODS: The data included neurosurgical procedures in 1005 TBI patients at an academic level 1 trauma center. The clinical event was intraoperative hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure <65 mm Hg for 5 or more consecutive minutes. Two types of models were developed: one based on preoperative patient-level predictors and one based on intraoperative predictors measured per minute. For each of these models, we took 2 approaches to predict the occurrence of a hypotensive event: a logistic regression model and a gradient boosting tree model.
RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the intraoperative logistic regression model was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.83), and for the gradient boosting model was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81-0.85). The area under the precision-recall curve for the intraoperative logistic regression model was 0.16 (95% CI: 0.12-0.20), and for the gradient boosting model was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.14-0.24). Model performance based on preoperative predictors was poor. Features derived from the recent trend of mean arterial pressure emerged as dominantly predictive in both intraoperative models.
CONCLUSIONS: This study developed a model for real-time prediction of intraoperative hypotension in TBI patients, which can use computationally efficient machine learning techniques and a streamlined feature-set derived from patient monitor data.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34759236      PMCID: PMC9091057          DOI: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol        ISSN: 0898-4921            Impact factor:   3.969


  29 in total

Review 1.  Secondary brain injury: Predicting and preventing insults.

Authors:  Christos Lazaridis; Craig G Rusin; Claudia S Robertson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  Forewarning of hypotensive events using a Bayesian artificial neural network in neurocritical care.

Authors:  Rob Donald; Tim Howells; Ian Piper; P Enblad; P Nilsson; I Chambers; B Gregson; G Citerio; K Kiening; J Neumann; A Ragauskas; J Sahuquillo; R Sinnott; A Stell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions.

Authors:  Hester F Lingsma; Bob Roozenbeek; Ewout W Steyerberg; Gordon D Murray; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Randall M Chesnut; Nancy Temkin; Nancy Carney; Sureyya Dikmen; Carlos Rondina; Walter Videtta; Gustavo Petroni; Silvia Lujan; Jim Pridgeon; Jason Barber; Joan Machamer; Kelley Chaddock; Juanita M Celix; Marianna Cherner; Terence Hendrix
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI): a prospective longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Andrew I R Maas; David K Menon; Ewout W Steyerberg; Giuseppe Citerio; Fiona Lecky; Geoffrey T Manley; Sean Hill; Valerie Legrand; Annina Sorgner
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Predicting secondary insults after severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Brandon W Bonds; Shiming Yang; Peter F Hu; Konstantinos Kalpakis; Lynn G Stansbury; Thomas M Scalea; Deborah M Stein
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.313

7.  Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery.

Authors:  Scott M Lundberg; Bala Nair; Monica S Vavilala; Mayumi Horibe; Michael J Eisses; Trevor Adams; David E Liston; Daniel King-Wai Low; Shu-Fang Newman; Jerry Kim; Su-In Lee
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 25.671

8.  Early and late systemic hypotension as a frequent and fundamental source of cerebral ischemia following severe brain injury in the Traumatic Coma Data Bank.

Authors:  R M Chesnut; S B Marshall; J Piek; B A Blunt; M R Klauber; L F Marshall
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien)       Date:  1993

9.  Machine-learning Algorithm to Predict Hypotension Based on High-fidelity Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis.

Authors:  Feras Hatib; Zhongping Jian; Sai Buddi; Christine Lee; Jos Settels; Karen Sibert; Joseph Rinehart; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Using an artificial neural network to predict traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Andrew T Hale; David P Stonko; Jaims Lim; Oscar D Guillamondegui; Chevis N Shannon; Mayur B Patel
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 2.713

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.