BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability. Episodes of hypotension are associated with worse TBI outcomes. Our aim was to model the real-time risk of intraoperative hypotension in TBI patients, compare machine learning and traditional modeling techniques, and identify key contributory features from the patient monitor and medical record for the prediction of intraoperative hypotension. METHODS: The data included neurosurgical procedures in 1005 TBI patients at an academic level 1 trauma center. The clinical event was intraoperative hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure <65 mm Hg for 5 or more consecutive minutes. Two types of models were developed: one based on preoperative patient-level predictors and one based on intraoperative predictors measured per minute. For each of these models, we took 2 approaches to predict the occurrence of a hypotensive event: a logistic regression model and a gradient boosting tree model. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the intraoperative logistic regression model was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.83), and for the gradient boosting model was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81-0.85). The area under the precision-recall curve for the intraoperative logistic regression model was 0.16 (95% CI: 0.12-0.20), and for the gradient boosting model was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.14-0.24). Model performance based on preoperative predictors was poor. Features derived from the recent trend of mean arterial pressure emerged as dominantly predictive in both intraoperative models. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed a model for real-time prediction of intraoperative hypotension in TBI patients, which can use computationally efficient machine learning techniques and a streamlined feature-set derived from patient monitor data.
BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability. Episodes of hypotension are associated with worse TBI outcomes. Our aim was to model the real-time risk of intraoperative hypotension in TBI patients, compare machine learning and traditional modeling techniques, and identify key contributory features from the patient monitor and medical record for the prediction of intraoperative hypotension. METHODS: The data included neurosurgical procedures in 1005 TBI patients at an academic level 1 trauma center. The clinical event was intraoperative hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure <65 mm Hg for 5 or more consecutive minutes. Two types of models were developed: one based on preoperative patient-level predictors and one based on intraoperative predictors measured per minute. For each of these models, we took 2 approaches to predict the occurrence of a hypotensive event: a logistic regression model and a gradient boosting tree model. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the intraoperative logistic regression model was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.83), and for the gradient boosting model was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81-0.85). The area under the precision-recall curve for the intraoperative logistic regression model was 0.16 (95% CI: 0.12-0.20), and for the gradient boosting model was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.14-0.24). Model performance based on preoperative predictors was poor. Features derived from the recent trend of mean arterial pressure emerged as dominantly predictive in both intraoperative models. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed a model for real-time prediction of intraoperative hypotension in TBI patients, which can use computationally efficient machine learning techniques and a streamlined feature-set derived from patient monitor data.
Authors: Rob Donald; Tim Howells; Ian Piper; P Enblad; P Nilsson; I Chambers; B Gregson; G Citerio; K Kiening; J Neumann; A Ragauskas; J Sahuquillo; R Sinnott; A Stell Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Hester F Lingsma; Bob Roozenbeek; Ewout W Steyerberg; Gordon D Murray; Andrew I R Maas Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Randall M Chesnut; Nancy Temkin; Nancy Carney; Sureyya Dikmen; Carlos Rondina; Walter Videtta; Gustavo Petroni; Silvia Lujan; Jim Pridgeon; Jason Barber; Joan Machamer; Kelley Chaddock; Juanita M Celix; Marianna Cherner; Terence Hendrix Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrew I R Maas; David K Menon; Ewout W Steyerberg; Giuseppe Citerio; Fiona Lecky; Geoffrey T Manley; Sean Hill; Valerie Legrand; Annina Sorgner Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Brandon W Bonds; Shiming Yang; Peter F Hu; Konstantinos Kalpakis; Lynn G Stansbury; Thomas M Scalea; Deborah M Stein Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Scott M Lundberg; Bala Nair; Monica S Vavilala; Mayumi Horibe; Michael J Eisses; Trevor Adams; David E Liston; Daniel King-Wai Low; Shu-Fang Newman; Jerry Kim; Su-In Lee Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 25.671
Authors: Andrew T Hale; David P Stonko; Jaims Lim; Oscar D Guillamondegui; Chevis N Shannon; Mayur B Patel Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 2.713