| Literature DB >> 29796879 |
Asmaa T Y Kishawy1, Shimaa A Amer1, Ali Osman2, Shafika A M Elsayed3, Mohamed E Abd El-Hack4, Ayman A Swelum5,6, Hani Ba-Awadh7, Islam M Saadeldin7,8.
Abstract
The present study evaluated the impact of supplementing the rabbit diet with graded levels of whey powder and citric acid. The dietary treatments were as follows: T1, control diet (basal diet); T2, basal diet + 10 g/kg citric acid; T3, T2 + whey powder (7.5 g/kg); T4, T2 + whey powder (15 g/kg); and T5, T2 + whey powder (22.5 g/kg). Results, the T5 diet resulted in the best (P < 0.05) final body weight, body weight gain, feed conversion ratio, protein efficiency, relative growth rate, and dressed weight. The best (P < 0.05) digestion coefficients were associated with the T4 and T5 diets. Rabbits fed diets supplemented with citric acid alone or with addition of graded levels of whey powder showed significantly lower (P < 0.05) intestinal pH than those fed the T1 diet. The T4 and T5 diets resulted in greater CP and ash in the thigh muscle compared with the T1 and T2 diets. Calcium content in the femur bone was higher (P < 0.05) in the T5 group followed by T4 and T3. The wall of different parts of the small intestine improved in the T4 and T5 groups, showing the greatest increase in the small intestinal villi, intestinal glands, and amount of goblet cells. In conclusion, addition of whey powder (1.5, and 2.25%) increased the growth performance, nutrient digestibility and crude protein content of the thigh muscle, and improved the gut health of growing rabbits and the best level was 2.25% whey powder. Citric acid addition had no positive effect on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, crude protein content of the thigh muscle, and the gut health.Entities:
Keywords: Citric acid; Digestibility; Growth performance; Intestinal histology; Rabbit; Whey
Year: 2018 PMID: 29796879 PMCID: PMC5966368 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-018-0617-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Chemical composition of the experimental diets (g/kg)
| Ingredients | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berseem hay | 340 | 340 | 340 | 340 | 340 |
| Yellow corn | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
| Barely grain | 150 | 150 | 142.5 | 135 | 127.5 |
| Whey powder | 0 | 0 | 7.5 | 15 | 22.5 |
| Wheat bran | 205 | 205 | 208 | 208 | 208 |
| Soy bean meal 44% CP | 139 | 139 | 139 | 139 | 139 |
| Calcium carbonate | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Premixa | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Salt | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Antitoxins (TOXY-NILL plus) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Anti-coccidial (AMPROL 128) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Calculated composition(g/kg)b | |||||
| Digestible energy (DE), kcal/kg | 2515 | 2515 | 2517 | 2512 | 2507 |
| Crude protein | 166.8 | 166.8 | 167.4 | 167.5 | 167.7 |
| Crude fiber | 125.2 | 125.2 | 125.1 | 124.7 | 124.3 |
| Ether extract | 26.6 | 26.6 | 26.7 | 26.7 | 26.8 |
| Calcium | 6.29 | 6.29 | 8.61 | 11.99 | 15.36 |
| Available phosphorus | 5.14 | 5.14 | 5.15 | 5.13 | 5.11 |
| Lysine | 9.06 | 9.06 | 9.04 | 9.01 | 8.97 |
| Cystine | 3.04 | 3.04 | 3.03 | 3.02 | 3.00 |
| Methionine | 2.19 | 2.19 | 2.18 | 2.17 | 2.16 |
| Threonine | 5.90 | 5.90 | 5.91 | 5.91 | 5.90 |
aPremix: each 5 kg contain vit. A (1800,000 IU), vit. D3 (3,000,000 IU), vit. E (3200 mg), vit. B1 (200 mg), vit. B2 (600 mg), vit. B6 (200 mg), vit. B12 (2 mg), calcium antothenate (2000 mg), nicotinic acid (4400 mg), choline (10,000 mg), Fe (10,000 mg), Mn (10,000 mg), Cu (3000 mg), I (200 mg), Co (20 mg), Se (20 mg) and Zn (12,000 mg), Magnesium (100 g)
bAccording to (NRC 1977)
The effect of graded levels of whey with addition of citric acid on growth performance
| Parameters | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial wt (kg) | 0.968 ± 0.009 | 0.952 ± 0.009 | 0.954 ± 0.015 | 0.951 ± 0.005 | 0.955 ± 0.007 | 0.691 |
| Final BW (kg) | 1.955 ± 0.046c | 2.009 ± 0.058c | 2.099 ± 0.038bc | 2.218 ± 0.078b | 2.401 ± 0.065a | ≤ 0.001 |
| BWG (kg) | 0.987 ± 0.049c | 1.057 ± 0.060c | 1.145 ± 0.032bc | 1.267 ± 0.079b | 1.447 ± 0.062a | ≤ 0.001 |
| FI (kg) | 4.373 ± 0.66 | 4.445 ± 0.102 | 4.448 ± 0.123 | 4.527 ± 0.181 | 4.219 ± 0.074 | 0.437 |
| FCR | 4.48 ± 0.249a | 4.25 ± 0.200ab | 3.89 ± 0.044bc | 3.60 ± 0.166c | 2.95 ± 0.180d | ≤ 0.001 |
| PER | 1.358 ± 0.087c | 1.424 ± 0.067bc | 1.539 ± 0.017bc | 1.671 ± 0.082b | 2.052 ± 0.115a | ≤ 0.001 |
| RGR (%) | 67.394 ± 2.349d | 71.197 ± 2.766cd | 74.959 ± 1.365bc | 79.678 ± 3.040ab | 86.035 ± 2.065a | ≤ 0.001 |
T1, basal diet with no additives; T2, basal diet supplemented with citric acid (10 g/kg) and no whey; T3, T2 + whey powder (7.5 g/kg); T4, T2 + whey powder(15 g/kg); T5, T2 + whey powder (22.5 g/kg)
BW body weight; BWG body weight gain; FI feed intake; FCR feed conversion ratio; PER protein efficiency ratio; RGR relative growth rate
a–dMeans within the same row carrying different superscripts are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05)
The effect of graded levels of whey with addition of citric acid on carcass traits % relative to life body weight
| Relative weights (%) | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dressed | 50.98 ± 0.56 | 54.385 ± 1.07 | 53.574 ± 0.94 | 53.705 ± 0.92 | 54.901 ± 1.62 | 0.138 |
| Liver | 3.206 ± 0.34 | 3.572 ± 0.215 | 3.454 ± 0 .29 | 3.466 ± 0.18 | 3.682 ± 0.22 | 0.752 |
| Kidney | 0.542 ± 0.03 | 0.497 ± 0.015 | 0.548 ± 0.03 | 0.530 ± 0.02 | 0.534 ± 0.03 | 0.665 |
| Heart | 0.367 ± 0.05 | 0 .276 ± 0.046 | 0.376 ± 0.06 | 0.363 ± 0.05 | 0.308 ± 0.04 | 0.547 |
T1, basal diet with no additives; T2, basal diet supplemented with citric acid (10 g/kg) and no whey; T3, T2 + whey powder (7.5 g/kg); T4, T2 + whey powder(15 g/kg); T5, T2 + whey powder (22.5 g/kg)
The effect of graded levels of whey with addition of citric acid on digestion coefficient (DC) of nutrients (%) on dry matter basis
| DC | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM | 73.70 ± 0.21c | 75.34 ± 0.33bc | 77.06 ± 1.67b | 80.72 ± 0.66a | 82.31 ± 0.86a | ≤ 0.001 |
| CP | 58.49 ± 0.50b | 58.57 ± 0.84b | 62.36 ± 3.11b | 71.40 ± 1.28a | 76.18 ± 0.63a | ≤ 0.001 |
| CF | 22.78 ± 2.47c | 27.59 ± 1.06bc | 31.47 ± 1.88b | 42.40 ± 2.40a | 45.51 ± 1.76a | ≤ 0.001 |
| Ash | 51.07 ± 1.02c | 58.78 ± 0.96b | 59.72 ± 1.91b | 70.01 ± 1.53a | 70.95 ± 2.01a | ≤ 0.001 |
| EE | 52.11 ± 1.92b | 55.00 ± 1.83b | 60.22 ± 4.57ab | 66.97 ± 2.69a | 68.45 ± 1.39a | 0.006 |
| NFE | 49.77 ± 2.71 | 53.33 ± 0.18 | 54.27 ± 5.59 | 56.94 ± 1.32 | 62.37 ± 2.32 | 0.118 |
T1, basal diet with no additives; T2, basal diet supplemented with citric acid (10 g/kg) and no whey; T3, T2 + whey powder (7.5 g/kg); T4, T2 + whey powder(15 g/kg); T5, T2 + whey powder (22.5 g/kg)
DM dry matter; CP crude protein; CF crude fiber; Ash ash; EE ether extract; NFE nitrogen free extract
a–cMeans within the same row carrying different superscripts are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05)
The effect of graded levels of whey with addition of citric acid on intestinal and muscle PH, and femur bone analysis on fresh basis
| Parameters | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intestinal pH | 8.15 ± 0.25a | 7.36 ± 0.13b | 7.68 ± 0.15b | 7.38 ± 0.17b | 6.66 ± 0.18c | ≤ 0.001 |
| Muscle pH | 6.88 ± 0.12 | 7.13 ± 0.09 | 7.04 ± 0.07 | 7.07 ± 0.07 | 7.12 ± 0.11 | 0.357 |
| Femur bone analysis (%) | ||||||
| Ash | 38.08 ± 1.81 | 38.91 ± 2.15 | 39.11 ± 0.78 | 37.83 ± 0.93 | 39.37 ± 0.45 | 0.916 |
| Ca | 3.12 ± 0.12c | 3.25 ± 0.22c | 4.32 ± 0.08b | 4.88 ± 0.19ab | 5.05 ± 0.28a | ≤ 0.001 |
| P | 2.90 ± 0.16b | 3.15 ± 0.25b | 3.82 ± 0.07a | 4.03 ± 0.13a | 4.20 ± 0.17a | ≤ 0.001 |
T1, basal diet with no additives; T2, basal diet supplemented with citric acid (10 g/kg) and no whey; T3, T2 + whey powder (7.5 g/kg); T4, T2 + whey powder(15 g/kg); T5, T2 + whey powder (22.5 g/kg)
a–cMeans within the same row carrying different superscripts are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05)
The effect of graded levels of whey with addition of citric acid on chemical analysis of thigh muscle on fresh basis
| Parameters (%) | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM | 29.27 ± 0.19 | 29.41 ± 0.24 | 29.83 ± 0.17 | 29.79 ± 0.33 | 30.07 ± 0.41 | 0.324 |
| CP | 21.56 ± 0.05b | 21.62 ± 0.301b | 22.23 ± 0.18ab | 22.39 ± 0.23a | 22.78 ± 0.30a | 0.017 |
| EE | 2.65 ± 0.01 | 2.66 ± 0.03 | 2.70 ± 0.04 | 2.70 ± 0.07 | 2.71 ± 0.04 | 0.754 |
| Ash | 0.75 ± 0.01b | 0.79 ± 0.02ab | 0.81 ± 0.01a | 0.81 ± 0.01a | 0.81 ± 0.02a | 0.045 |
| Ca* | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.150 |
| P* | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.184 |
T1, basal diet with no additives; T2, basal diet supplemented with citric acid (10 g/kg) and no whey; T3, T2 + whey powder (7.5 g/kg); T4, T2 + whey powder(15 g/kg); T5, T2 + whey powder (22.5 g/kg)
* On dry matter basis
a,bMeans within the same row carrying different superscripts are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05)
Fig. 1Group T3: a, b showing normal duodenum mucosa and submucosa with brunners gland (B). c–e Normal jejunum mucosa and submucosa with normal covering epithelium of columnar absorptive and goblet cells (arrow)
Fig. 2Group T4: a showing normal duodenum wall. b Normal covering epithelium of columnar absorptive (arrow) and goblet cells (arrow head). c, d Normal brunners gland (B)
Fig. 3Group T5: a, b showing normal, intact jejunum mucosa. c, d Well-developed intestinal gland in the mucosa with increasing number of goblet cells (arrow)
Fig. 4Group T5: a showing significant development in duodenum wall. b Showing massive layer of mixed brunners gland filling almost of the submucosa. c–e normal, regular and intact lymphatic nodules; peyers patches within the ileum submucosa (arrow head), intact villi (arrow) with increase in goblet lining cells (double arrows)