Literature DB >> 19038814

The effects of several organic acids on growth performance, nutrient digestibilities, and cecal microbial populations in young chicks.

P Biggs1, C M Parsons.   

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of citric, gluconic, fumaric, and malic acids on growth and nutrient digestibility in New Hampshire x Columbian male chicks from hatch to 21 d. For growth performance, chicks fed 1 to 4% gluconic acid, 4% citric acid, or 4% malic acid in a corn-soybean meal diet generally showed reductions (P < 0.05) in growth to 21 d, whereas 3% citric acid, 2% malic acid, or 1.5 to 4.5% fumaric acid had no significant effect. In the first experiment, 2, 4, and 6% gluconic acid increased ME(n) values at 7, 14, and 21 d, but in experiment 2, 1 and 2% gluconic acid decreased ME(n) at 4 and 7 d, but had no effect at 14 and 21 d. The 4% level of citric acid increased ME(n) at 4 d. Digestibility of most amino acids (AA) was reduced by gluconic acid in some treatments, whereas citric acid (3%) increased AA digestibility at 4 d but not at 21 d. For cecal microbial populations at 21 d, bifidobacteria were reduced when 2% gluconic acid and 3% citric acid were fed to chicks in a corn-soybean meal diet, whereas 4% gluconic acid had no effect when fed in a dextrose-casein diet to chicks. In a dextrose-isolated soy protein diet, 4% gluconic acid reduced the cecal populations of Lactobacillus, Escherichia coli, and Clostridium perfringens. The results of this study indicated that feeding organic acids did not have any consistent effects on growth performance, ME(n), AA digestibility, or cecal microbial numbers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19038814     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2008-00080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  8 in total

1.  The Effects of Different Forms of Butyric Acid on the Performance of Turkeys, Carcass Quality, Incidence of Footpad Dermatitis and Economic Efficiency.

Authors:  Zbigniew Makowski; Krzysztof Lipiński; Magdalena Mazur-Kuśnirek
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Modulations of the chicken cecal microbiome and metagenome in response to anticoccidial and growth promoter treatment.

Authors:  Jessica L Danzeisen; Hyeun Bum Kim; Richard E Isaacson; Zheng Jin Tu; Timothy J Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Impacts of supplementing growing rabbit diets with whey powder and citric acid on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat and bone analysis, and gut health.

Authors:  Asmaa T Y Kishawy; Shimaa A Amer; Ali Osman; Shafika A M Elsayed; Mohamed E Abd El-Hack; Ayman A Swelum; Hani Ba-Awadh; Islam M Saadeldin
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Dietary organic acid and fiber sources affect performance, intestinal morphology, immune responses and gut microflora in broilers.

Authors:  Sakineh Sabour; Sayed A Tabeidian; Ghorbanali Sadeghi
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2018-09-22

5.  16S rRNA gene sequencing reveals an altered composition of the gut microbiota in chickens infected with a nephropathogenic infectious bronchitis virus.

Authors:  Puzhi Xu; Yan Shi; Ping Liu; Yitian Yang; Changming Zhou; Guyue Li; Junrong Luo; Caiying Zhang; Huabin Cao; Guoliang Hu; Xiaoquan Guo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Coccidiosis: Recent Progress in Host Immunity and Alternatives to Antibiotic Strategies.

Authors:  Youngsub Lee; Mingmin Lu; Hyun S Lillehoj
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29

7.  Effect of Dual Infection with Eimeria tenella and Subgroup J Avian Leukosis Virus on the Cecal Microbiome in Specific-Pathogen-Free Chicks.

Authors:  Ning Cui; Xiuzhen Wang; Qi Wang; Hongmei Li; Fangkun Wang; Xiaomin Zhao
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-10-25

8.  Dissection of the cecal microbial community in chickens after Eimeria tenella infection.

Authors:  Hong-Liang Chen; Xin-Yu Zhao; Guang-Xun Zhao; Hai-Bin Huang; Hao-Rui Li; Chun-Wei Shi; Wen-Tao Yang; Yan-Long Jiang; Jian-Zhong Wang; Li-Ping Ye; Quan Zhao; Chun-Feng Wang; Gui-Lian Yang
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.876

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.