A Jeanes1, J Dick2, P Coen1, N Drey3, D J Gould4. 1. Infection Control Department, University College London Hospitals, London, UK. 2. University College Hospital, London, UK. 3. City University London, London, UK. 4. Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene compliance scores in the anaesthetic department of an acute NHS hospital were persistently low. AIMS: To determine the feasibility and validity of regular accurate measurement of HHC in anaesthetics and understand the context of care delivery, barriers and opportunities to improve compliance. METHODS: The hand hygiene compliance of one anaesthetist was observed and noted by a senior infection control practitioner (ICP). This was compared to the World Health Organization five moments of hand hygiene and the organisation hand hygiene tool. FINDINGS: In one sequence of 55 min, there were approximately 58 hand hygiene opportunities. The hand hygiene compliance rate was 16%. The frequency and speed of actions in certain periods of care delivery made compliance measurement difficult and potentially unreliable. During several activities, taking time to apply alcohol gel or wash hands would have put the patients at significant risk. DISCUSSION: We concluded that hand hygiene compliance monitoring by direct observation was invalid and unreliable in this specialty. It is important that hand hygiene compliance is optimal in anaesthetics particularly before patient contact. Interventions which reduce environmental and patient contamination, such as cleaning the patient and environment, could ensure anaesthetists encounter fewer micro-organisms in this specialty.
BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene compliance scores in the anaesthetic department of an acute NHS hospital were persistently low. AIMS: To determine the feasibility and validity of regular accurate measurement of HHC in anaesthetics and understand the context of care delivery, barriers and opportunities to improve compliance. METHODS: The hand hygiene compliance of one anaesthetist was observed and noted by a senior infection control practitioner (ICP). This was compared to the World Health Organization five moments of hand hygiene and the organisation hand hygiene tool. FINDINGS: In one sequence of 55 min, there were approximately 58 hand hygiene opportunities. The hand hygiene compliance rate was 16%. The frequency and speed of actions in certain periods of care delivery made compliance measurement difficult and potentially unreliable. During several activities, taking time to apply alcohol gel or wash hands would have put the patients at significant risk. DISCUSSION: We concluded that hand hygiene compliance monitoring by direct observation was invalid and unreliable in this specialty. It is important that hand hygiene compliance is optimal in anaesthetics particularly before patient contact. Interventions which reduce environmental and patient contamination, such as cleaning the patient and environment, could ensure anaesthetists encounter fewer micro-organisms in this specialty.
Authors: Tim Eckmanns; Jan Bessert; Michael Behnke; Petra Gastmeier; Henning Ruden Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2006-08-22 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Randy W Loftus; Matthew D Koff; Corey C Burchman; Joseph D Schwartzman; Valerie Thorum; Megan E Read; Tammara A Wood; Michael L Beach Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: L Silvia Munoz-Price; David A Lubarsky; Kristopher L Arheart; Guillermo Prado; Timothy Cleary; Yovanit Fajardo-Aquino; Dennise Depascale; Scott Eber; Philip Carling; David J Birnbach Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Lizabeth D Martin; Sally E Rampersad; Jeremy M Geiduschek; Danielle M Zerr; Gillian K Weiss; Lynn D Martin Journal: Paediatr Anaesth Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 2.556
Authors: John Rowlands; Mark P Yeager; Michael Beach; Hetal M Patel; Bridget C Huysman; Randy W Loftus Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Randy W Loftus; Jeremiah R Brown; Matthew D Koff; Sundara Reddy; Stephen O Heard; Hetal M Patel; Patrick G Fernandez; Michael L Beach; Howard L Corwin; Jens T Jensen; David Kispert; Bridget Huysman; Thomas M Dodds; Kathryn L Ruoff; Mark P Yeager Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2012-03-30 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Claas Baier; Maren Tinne; Thomas von Lengerke; Frank Gossé; Ella Ebadi Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 4.887
Authors: Dinah Gould; Edward Purssell; Annette Jeanes; Nicolas Drey; Jane Chudleigh; Jacob McKnight Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 7.035