Literature DB >> 16795488

Shaping data collection congruent with experimental hypotheses.

K D O'leary1, R N Kent, J Kanowitz.   

Abstract

The influence of instructions and feedback from an experimenter on observational recordings of disruptive behavior was evaluated. Four subject-observers recorded four categories of disruptive behavior from videotapes of children in a classroom setting. Two sets of videotapes, labelled "baseline" and "treatment", were matched for rates of disruptive behavior in each category. The observers were told that two target behaviors were expected to decrease and the other two control behaviors were not expected to change during the treatment condition. During observational recording of treatment videotapes, the observers were given positive feedback when they reported decreases in the two target behaviors, and negative feedback when they reported either to change or increases in the two control behaviors. The target behaviors were recorded less frequently by observers, while recordings of control behaviors were unaffected during the treatment phase. These results suggest that contingent feedback to observers should be avoided as a possible source of bias in behavioral recordings.

Entities:  

Year:  1975        PMID: 16795488      PMCID: PMC1311816          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  6 in total

1.  VARIABLES AFFECTING EXPERIMENTER BIAS IN A GROUP SITUATION.

Authors:  R ROSENTHAL; C J FRIEDMAN; C A JOHNSON; K FODE; T SCHILL; R C WHITE; L L VIKAN
Journal:  Genet Psychol Monogr       Date:  1964-11

2.  Measuring the reliability of observational data: a reactive process.

Authors:  R G Romanczyk; R N Kent; C Diament; K D O'leary
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1973

3.  Free-time as a reinforcer in the management of classroom behavior.

Authors:  J G Osborne
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1969

4.  The effect of intermittent feedback and intermittent contingent access to play on printing of kindergarten children.

Authors:  B H Salzberg; A J Wheeler; L T Devar; B L Hopkins
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1971

5.  Expectation biases in observational evaluation of therapeutic change.

Authors:  R N Kent; K D O'Leary; C Diament; A Dietz
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1974-12

6.  The effects of loud and soft reprimands on the behavior of disruptive students.

Authors:  K D O'Leary; K F Kaufman; R E Kass; R S Drabman
Journal:  Except Child       Date:  1970-10
  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  Practical implications of data reliability and treatment integrity monitoring.

Authors:  Timothy R Vollmer; Kimberly N Sloman; Claire St Peter Pipkin
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2008

2.  Applying signal-detection theory to the study of observer accuracy and bias in behavioral assessment.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Allison Tetreault; Alyson Hovanetz; Emily Bellaci; Jonathan Miller; Hilary Karp; Angela Mahmood; Maggie Strobel; Shelley Mullen; Alice Keyl; Alexis Toupard
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010

3.  Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart.

Authors:  M M Wolf
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1978

4.  Comparison of observational recordings in vivo, via mirror, and via television.

Authors:  R N Kent; K D O'leary; A Dietz; C Diament
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1979

5.  Observer agreement, credibility, and judgment: some considerations in presenting observer agreement data.

Authors:  T R Kratochwill; R J Wetzel
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1977

6.  The effects of instructions and calculation procedures on observers' accuracy, agreement, and calculation correctness.

Authors:  R A Boykin; R O Nelson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1981

7.  The effect of witnessing consequences on the behavioral recordings of experimental observers.

Authors:  F C Harris; A R Ciminero
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1978

8.  Artifact, bias, and complexity of assessment: the ABCs of reliability.

Authors:  A E Kazdin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1977

9.  Observation procedure, observer gender, and behavior valence as determinants of sampling error in a behavior assessment analogue.

Authors:  G M Farkas; R G Tharp
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1980

10.  The effects of biasing information on behavioral observations and rating scales.

Authors:  L J Siegel; S L Dragovich; D Marholin
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1976
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.