Literature DB >> 25986062

The Stability of Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence Over 8 Years.

Eunike Wetzel1, Oliver Lüdtke2, Ingo Zettler3, Jan R Böhnke4.   

Abstract

This study investigated the stability of extreme response style (ERS) and acquiescence response style (ARS) over a period of 8 years. ERS and ARS were measured with item sets drawn randomly from a large pool of items used in an ongoing German panel study. Latent-trait-state-occasion and latent-state models were applied to test the relationship between time-specific (state) response style behaviors and time-invariant trait components of response styles. The results show that across different random item samples, on average between 49% and 59% of the variance in the state response style factors was explained by the trait response style factors. This indicates that the systematic differences respondents show in their preferences for certain response categories are remarkably stable over a period of 8 years. The stability of ERS and ARS implies that it is important to consider response styles in the analysis of self-report data from polytomous rating scales, especially in longitudinal studies aimed at investigating stability in substantive traits. Furthermore, the stability of response styles raises the question in how far they might be considered trait-like latent variables themselves that could be of substantive interest.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TOSCA; acquiescence; extreme response style; latent-state model; latent-trait-state-occasion model; response styles

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25986062     DOI: 10.1177/1073191115583714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  10 in total

1.  A Simulation Study on Methods of Correcting for the Effects of Extreme Response Style.

Authors:  Eunike Wetzel; Jan R Böhnke; Norman Rose
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Extreme Response Style and the Measurement of Intra-Individual Variability in Affect.

Authors:  Sien Deng; Danielle E McCarthy; Megan E Piper; Timothy B Baker; Daniel M Bolt
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  The Role of Response Styles in the Assessment of Intraindividual Personality Variability.

Authors:  Brendan M Baird; Richard E Lucas; M Brent Donnellan
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2016-06-23

4.  Measuring Response Style Stability Across Constructs With Item Response Trees.

Authors:  Allison J Ames
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  Stability and change in the Big Five personality traits: Findings from a longitudinal study of Mexican-origin adults.

Authors:  Olivia E Atherton; Angelina R Sutin; Antonio Terracciano; Richard W Robins
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2021-09-02

6.  Modified Logistic Regression Approaches to Eliminating the Impact of Response Styles on DIF Detection in Likert-Type Scales.

Authors:  Hui-Fang Chen; Kuan-Yu Jin; Wen-Chung Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-07

7.  Formal Modeling of the Resistance to Peer Influence Questionnaire: A Comparison of Adolescent Boys and Girls With and Without Mild-to-Borderline Intellectual Disability.

Authors:  Laura M S Dekkers; Anika Bexkens; Abe D Hofman; Paul De Boeck; Annematt L Collot d'Escury; Hilde M Huizenga
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2017-03-23

8.  Assessing Emotional Intelligence Abilities, Acquiescent and Extreme Responding in Situational Judgment Tests Using Principal Component Metrics.

Authors:  Johnny R J Fontaine; Eva K Sekwena; Elke Veirman; Katja Schlegel; Carolyn MacCann; Richard D Roberts; Klaus R Scherer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-26

9.  Measurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory.

Authors:  N Maritza Dowling; Daniel M Bolt; Sien Deng; Chenxi Li
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Extreme response style bias in burn survivors.

Authors:  Pengsheng Ni; Molly Marino; Emily Dore; Lily Sonis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Alan M Jette; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.