Literature DB >> 36029390

Power Analysis for the Wald, LR, Score, and Gradient Tests in a Marginal Maximum Likelihood Framework: Applications in IRT.

Felix Zimmer1, Clemens Draxler2, Rudolf Debelak3.   

Abstract

The Wald, likelihood ratio, score, and the recently proposed gradient statistics can be used to assess a broad range of hypotheses in item response theory models, for instance, to check the overall model fit or to detect differential item functioning. We introduce new methods for power analysis and sample size planning that can be applied when marginal maximum likelihood estimation is used. This allows the application to a variety of IRT models, which are commonly used in practice, e.g., in large-scale educational assessments. An analytical method utilizes the asymptotic distributions of the statistics under alternative hypotheses. We also provide a sampling-based approach for applications where the analytical approach is computationally infeasible. This can be the case with 20 or more items, since the computational load increases exponentially with the number of items. We performed extensive simulation studies in three practically relevant settings, i.e., testing a Rasch model against a 2PL model, testing for differential item functioning, and testing a partial credit model against a generalized partial credit model. The observed distributions of the test statistics and the power of the tests agreed well with the predictions by the proposed methods in sufficiently large samples. We provide an openly accessible R package that implements the methods for user-supplied hypotheses.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Wald test; gradient test; item response theory; likelihood ratio; marginal maximum likelihood; power analysis; score test

Year:  2022        PMID: 36029390     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-022-09883-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.290


  24 in total

1.  The new statistics: why and how.

Authors:  Geoff Cumming
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-11-12

2.  Sample Size Determination Within the Scope of Conditional Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Special Focus on Testing the Rasch Model.

Authors:  Clemens Draxler; Rainer W Alexandrowicz
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Comparing the Two- and Three-Parameter Logistic Models via Likelihood Ratio Tests: A Commonly Misunderstood Problem.

Authors:  Christy Brown; Jonathan Templin; Allan Cohen
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-12-16

Review 4.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Numerical approximation of the observed information matrix with Oakes' identity.

Authors:  R Philip Chalmers
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 6.  Machine Learning Approaches for Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry.

Authors:  Dominic B Dwyer; Peter Falkai; Nikolaos Koutsouleris
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 18.561

7.  Use of the Lagrange Multiplier Test for Assessing Measurement Invariance Under Model Misspecification.

Authors:  Lucia Guastadisegni; Silvia Cagnone; Irini Moustaki; Vassilis Vasdekis
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.821

8.  Analysis of longitudinal randomized clinical trials using item response models.

Authors:  Cees A W Glas; Hanneke Geerlings; Mart A F J van de Laar; Erik Taal
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Power and sample size determination for the group comparison of patient-reported outcomes using the Rasch model: impact of a misspecification of the parameters.

Authors:  Myriam Blanchin; Alice Guilleux; Bastien Perrot; Angélique Bonnaud-Antignac; Jean-Benoit Hardouin; Véronique Sébille
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Statistical power of likelihood ratio and Wald tests in latent class models with covariates.

Authors:  Dereje W Gudicha; Verena D Schmittmann; Jeroen K Vermunt
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Analysis of Current Situation Regarding Scientific Fitness Literacy of Nurses in Sports Medicine Integration.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Yan Wang; Xiao-Yang Shi; Xin-Yu Liu; Cai-Hong Cui; Liang Qin; Qi-Xuan Wei; Zong-Bao Niu
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2022-10-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.