| Literature DB >> 29795562 |
Dong Liu1,2, Yimei Huang1, Hao Yan1, Yueli Jiang1, Tong Zhao1, Shaoshan An2.
Abstract
Microbially-mediated soil N mineralization and transformation are crucial to plant growth. However, changes in soil microbial groups and various N components are not clearly understood. To explore the relationship between soil N components and microbial communities, we conducted an in-situ experiment on two typically planted forest species, namely, Sibirica Apricot (SA) and Prunus davidiana Franch (PdF) by using closed-top polyvinyl chloride tubes. Changes in soil inorganic N, organic N (ON) fractions, and levels of microbial phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) were measured bimonthly from April 2012 to April 2013. Microbial PLFAs and the concentrations of easily-available microbial biomass N (MBN; ~60 mg kg-1), soluble ON (SON; ~20 mg kg-1), and inorganic N were similar between the two soils whereas the ON (~900 mg kg-1) and its major part total acid-hydrolyzable N (HTN; ~500 mg kg-1), were significantly different (p < 0.05) in most months (5/6 and 4/6; respectively). The canonical correlation analysis of soil N fractions and microbial parameters indicated that the relationship between total PLFAs (total biomass of living cells) and NH4+-N was the most representative. The relative contributions (indicated by the absolute value of canonical coefficient) of NH4+-N were the largest, followed by NO3--N and MBN. For the HTN component, the relative percentage of hydrolyzable amino acid N and ammonium N decreased markedly in the first half of the year. Canonical variation mainly reflected the relationship between ammonium N and bacterial PLFAs, which were the most sensitive indicators related to soil N changes. The relative contributions of HTN components to the link between soil microbial groups and HTN components were ammonium N > amino acid N > amino sugar N. Observations from our study indicate the sensitivity of soil N mineralization indicators in relation to the temporal variation of soil microbial groups and N fractions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29795562 PMCID: PMC5967799 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196567
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Geographic and vegetation characteristics of the sites.
| Vegetation type | ||
|---|---|---|
| (SA) | (PdF) | |
| Planting time (y) | 2002 | 2000 |
| Slope aspect (°) | NE32° | NE41° |
| Slope degree (°) | 4 | 18 |
| Latitude | N35°59′50.61″ | N36°00′0.36″ |
| Longitude | E106°28′1.51″ | E106°27′53.77″ |
| Elevation (m a.s.l.) | 1617 | 1632 |
| Main companion | ||
| Species | ||
| Coverage (%) | 60 | 45 |
Soil basic physical and chemical properties.
| Month | SOC | C:N | pH | Soil moisture | Bulk density | Rainfall | Soil temperature | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g·kg−1) | ratio | (%) | (g·cm−3) | (mm) | (°C) | |||
| Apr. (2012) | 9.50±1.24b | 10.4±2.2b | 8.22±0.46a | 14±0.7a | 1.27±0.04a | 20 | 2.54±1.11d | |
| Jun. (2012) | 7.89±1.45c | 10.4±2.3b | 8.36±0.42a | 7±0.3c | 1.25±0.01a | 75 | 16.72±4.21b | |
| Aug. (2012) | 6.64±2.05d | 9.0±0.8c | 8.34±0.36a | 7±0.2c | 1.27±0.04a | 110 | 24.31±9.89a | |
| Oct. (2012) | 7.20±0.32c | 9.6±2.0c | 8.63±0.42a | 9±0.9b | 1.28±0.02a | 48 | 6.68±2.23c | |
| Dec. (2012) | 7.42±1.31c | 9.5±1.1c | 8.44±0.47a | 12±0.7a | 1.27±0.07a | 15 | 1.24±1.00e | |
| Apr. (2013) | 10.07±1.52a | 13.5±1.2a | 8.38±0.06a | 10±0.3a | 1.29±0.09a | 21 | 3.81±2.23d | |
| Apr. (2012) | 9.84±0.17b | 9.9±1.0b | 8.20±0.17a | 19±0.4a | 1.06±0.04a | 24 | 3.32±1.01d | |
| Jun. (2012) | 9.04±1.36d | 8.9±1.1c | 8.33±0.86a | 14±1.0b | 1.09±0.03a | 81 | 14.18±4.23b | |
| Aug. (2012) | 9.12±0.36c | 9.8±1.0b | 8.44±0.48a | 11±0.5b | 1.06±0.12a | 117 | 25.12±5.39a | |
| Oct. (2012) | 10.19±1.86a | 11.2±0.4a | 8.20±1.95a | 20±6.5a | 1.06±0.01a | 55 | 5.57±2.19c | |
| Dec. (2012) | 9.51±1.91b | 9.7±1.2b | 8.61±0.56a | 18±5.6a | 1.09±0.02a | 20 | 1.79±0.89e | |
| Apr. (2013) | 10.31±0.74a | 11.1±1.2a | 8.35±0.69a | 13±0.2b | 1.09±0.04a | 20 | 3.11±2.23d |
SA (Sibirica apricot), PdF (P. davidiana Franch).
Data are means ± SE (standard error), n = 6. For each plant species, different lowercase letters indicate statistical difference among the 6 months at 0.05 level by ANOVA, followed by Duncan post-hoc.
Fig 1Bimonthly changes in soil N concentrations in the Sibirica Apricot (SA) and Prunus davidiana Franch (PdF) soils within one year.
Ammonification, mineralization, and nitrification rates (mg kg−1 d−1) in SA and PdF soils along temporal patterns.
| Time interval | Ammonification | Nitrification | Mineralization | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA | SA | SA | ||||
| Apr−Jun | −0.024 b | −0.009 b | ||||
| Jun−Aug | −0.131 a | −0.100 a | −0.114 a | −0.093 a | −0.244 a | −0.193 a |
| Aug−Oct | −0.009 a | −0.014 a | −0.004 a | −0.003 a | ||
| Oct−Dec | ||||||
| Dec−Apr+ | ||||||
| Annual mean | −0.013 a | −0.014 a | −0.008 a | −0.007 a | −0.024 a | −0.023 a |
Positive values are shown in bold. Different lowercase letters (between SA and PdF) indicate independent samples t-test at a significance level of 0.05. “April+” means April in the year of 2013 and the other months were all in 2012.
Fig 2Bimonthly changes of the HTN in SA and PdF soils.
Fig 3Microbial community structure (determined by PLFAs analysis) of bimonthly variations in SA and PdF soils.
Canonical correlation coefficients between ON components and PLFAs.
| Canonical correlation coefficient significance test | Proportion that can be explained (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-CV | N-CV | |||||||
| No. | Correlation | Chi-SQ | DF | Sig. | Within- | Between- | Within- | Between- |
| cluster | cluster | cluster | cluster | |||||
| 1 | 0.989 | 174.28 | 36 | 0.0001 | 45.8 | 43.2 | 38.1 | 37.6 |
| 2 | 0.954 | 17.03 | 25 | 0.880 | 10.5 | 9.5 | 17.8 | 16.2 |
| 3 | 0.801 | 6.23 | 16 | 0.985 | 30.7 | 26.1 | 8.5 | 5.5 |
| 4 | 0.519 | 1.69 | 9 | 0.996 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 14.6 | 3.9 |
| 5 | 0.182 | 0.27 | 4 | 0.995 | 7.3 | 0.2 | 16.8 | 1.2 |
| 6 | 0.111 | 0.055 | 1 | 0.814 | 10.2 | 0.1 | 14.3 | 0.2 |
| U1 = 0.137N1 − | ||||||||
| V1 = −0.322P1 − | ||||||||
CCA was performed using the soil N (ON components) and PLFAs; six pairs of canonical variates (CVs) were extracted (as shown by the numbers in the first column). U1 and V1 refer to the first group equation between ON components (N-CV) and the PLFA canonical variate (P-CV), which present the highest significant coefficient of 0.0001. The remaining four equations of U2,V2 − U5,V5 did not appear because their canonical correlation coefficients were higher than 0.05. The indices of N-CVs and P-CVs were as follows: Acid-hydrolyzable TN (N1), acid-hydrolyzable ammonium (N2), acid hydrolyzable amino acid N (N3) acid-hydrolyzable amino sugar N (N4), acid-hydrolyzable unknown N (N5), and acid non-hydrolyzable N (N6), as well as total PLFAs (P1), bacterial all (P2), Gram-positive bacteria (P3), Gram-negative bacteria (P 4), fungi (P 5), and actinomycetes (P 6).
Canonical correlation coefficients between soil N fractions and PLFAs.
| Canonical correlation coefficient significance test | Proportion that can be explained (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-CV | N-CV | |||||||
| No. | Correlation | Chi-SQ | DF | Sig. | Within- | Between- | Within- | Between- |
| cluster | cluster | cluster | cluster | |||||
| 1 | 0.994 | 169.407 | 36 | 0.0001 | 53 | 48.8 | 44.8 | 42.7 |
| 2 | 0.974 | 22.516 | 25 | 0.606 | 17.2 | 16.3 | 12.8 | 12.1 |
| 3 | 0.782 | 9.214 | 16 | 0.904 | 16.7 | 10.2 | 4.1 | 2.5 |
| 4 | 0.753 | 4.963 | 9 | 0.837 | 17.1 | 9.7 | 32.6 | 24.2 |
| 5 | 0.442 | 1.193 | 4 | 0.879 | 20.9 | 4.1 | 4.9 | 1 |
| 6 | 0.215 | 0.214 | 1 | 0.644 | 25.2 | 1.2 | 30.9 | 1.4 |
| N1 = | ||||||||
| V1 = | ||||||||
CCA was performed using the soil N fractions and PLFAs; six pairs of canonical variates (CVs) were extracted (as shown by the numbers in the first column). U1 and V1 refer to the first group equation between soil N (N-CV) and the PLFAs canonical variate (P-CV), which presents the highest significant coefficient of 0.0001. The remaining four equations of U2, V2 − U5, V5 did not show because its canonical correlation coefficients were higher than 0.05. The indices of N-CVs and P-CVs were NH4+-N (N7), NO3−-N (N8), NO3−-N (N9), ON (N10), SON (N11), SMN (N12), as well as total PLFAs (P1), bacterial all (P2), Gram-positive bacteria (P3), Gram-negative bacteria (P4), fungi (P5), and actinomycetes (P6)