| Literature DB >> 29793416 |
Kai Wang1, Weiming Sun1, Linlin Zhang2, Wei Guo2, Jiachun Xu1, Shuang Liu2, Zhen Zhou2, Yulian Zhang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abnormal amyloid β (Aβ) accumulation and deposition in the hippocampus is an essential process in Alzheimer's disease (AD).Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; Aβ; Ca2+; Oleanolic acid; long-term potentiation; synaptic plasticity.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29793416 PMCID: PMC6327117 DOI: 10.2174/1871527317666180525113109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets ISSN: 1871-5273 Impact factor: 4.388
Fig. (1)Results of Morris water maze test(n=15). (A) Swimming paths of rats in each group in the Morris water maze. (B) Average swimming speed of rats in each group. Repeated measurement ANOVA results showed that there was no significant difference of the average swimming speed in each group(F=0.331, P = 0.721>0.05) (C) Escape latency time of rats in each group. Post Pairwise Comparisons using Bonferroni method showed that the latency time in model group was significantly longer than that in sham operation group (P=0.0001<0.05); while it was significantly shorter in the OA group than that in model group (P=0.0001<0.05) (D) platform crossing times of rats in each group. Post comparison with LSD method showed that compared with sham group, the times of cross-platform in model group significantly decreased (P = 0.007 <0.05); while compared with model group, the times of cross-platform in OA group significantly increased (P = 0.0001 <0.05).
Notes:*indicates compared with that in the sham operation group, P<0.05.
#indicates compared with that in the model group, P<0.05.
Tests model effects.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 333.317 | 1 | 0.0001 |
| Groups | 12.827 | 2 | 0.002 |
| Time | 190.298 | 1 | 0.0001 |
| Groups×Times | 5.523 | 2 | 0.063 |
Estimated marginal means of escape latency.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Sham | 13.95 | 2.03 | 9.97 | 17.94 |
| Model | 24.64 | 2.11 | 20.51 | 28.78 |
| OA | 16.89 | 2.29 | 12.40 | 21.37 |
Ca2+ concentration of each group (Mean±SD).
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Sham operation | 3 | 0.96±0.09 |
| Model | 3 | 1.68±0.18* |
| OA | 3 | 1.11±0.42# |
Notes: *indicates compared with that in the sham operation group, P<0.05.
#indicates compared with that in the model group, P<0.05