Literature DB >> 29787381

Multi atlas based segmentation: should we prefer the best atlas group over the group of best atlases?

Paolo Zaffino1, Delia Ciardo, Patrik Raudaschl, Karl Fritscher, Rosalinda Ricotti, Daniela Alterio, Giulia Marvaso, Cristiana Fodor, Guido Baroni, Francesco Amato, Roberto Orecchia, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa, Gregory C Sharp, Maria Francesca Spadea.   

Abstract

Multi atlas based segmentation (MABS) uses a database of atlas images, and an atlas selection process is used to choose an atlas subset for registration and voting. In the current state of the art, atlases are chosen according to a similarity criterion between the target subject and each atlas in the database. In this paper, we propose a new concept for atlas selection that relies on selecting the best performing group of atlases rather than the group of highest scoring individual atlases. Experiments were performed using CT images of 50 patients, with contours of brainstem and parotid glands. The dataset was randomly split into two groups: 20 volumes were used as an atlas database and 30 served as target subjects for testing. Classic oracle selection, where atlases are chosen by the highest dice similarity coefficient (DSC) with the target, was performed. This was compared to oracle group selection, where all the combinations of atlas subgroups were considered and scored by computing DSC with the target subject. Subsequently, convolutional neural networks were designed to predict the best group of atlases. The results were also compared with the selection strategy based on normalized mutual information (NMI). Oracle group was proven to be significantly better than classic oracle selection (p  <  10-5). Atlas group selection led to a median  ±  interquartile DSC of 0.740  ±  0.084, 0.718  ±  0.086 and 0.670  ±  0.097 for brainstem and left/right parotid glands respectively, outperforming NMI selection 0.676  ±  0.113, 0.632  ±  0.104 and 0.606  ±  0.118 (p  <  0.001) as well as classic oracle selection. The implemented methodology is a proof of principle that selecting the atlases by considering the performance of the entire group of atlases instead of each single atlas leads to higher segmentation accuracy, being even better then current oracle strategy. This finding opens a new discussion about the most appropriate atlas selection criterion for MABS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29787381     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aac712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  FCN Based Label Correction for Multi-Atlas Guided Organ Segmentation.

Authors:  Hancan Zhu; Ehsan Adeli; Feng Shi; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2020-04

2.  SOMA: Subject-, object-, and modality-adapted precision atlas approach for automatic anatomy recognition and delineation in medical images.

Authors:  Jieyu Li; Jayaram K Udupa; Dewey Odhner; Yubing Tong; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dynamic multiatlas selection-based consensus segmentation of head and neck structures from CT images.

Authors:  Rabia Haq; Sean L Berry; Joseph O Deasy; Margie Hunt; Harini Veeraraghavan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Automated atlas-based segmentation for skull base surgical planning.

Authors:  Neeraja Konuthula; Francisco A Perez; A Murat Maga; Waleed M Abuzeid; Kris Moe; Blake Hannaford; Randall A Bly
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.421

5.  Automatic pedicle screw planning using atlas-based registration of anatomy and reference trajectories.

Authors:  R Vijayan; T De Silva; R Han; X Zhang; A Uneri; S Doerr; M Ketcha; A Perdomo-Pantoja; N Theodore; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 4.174

6.  Multi-atlas label fusion with random local binary pattern features: Application to hippocampus segmentation.

Authors:  Hancan Zhu; Zhenyu Tang; Hewei Cheng; Yihong Wu; Yong Fan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Geometrical and dosimetric evaluation of breast target volume auto-contouring.

Authors:  Rita Simões; Geert Wortel; Terry G Wiersma; Tomas M Janssen; Uulke A van der Heide; Peter Remeijer
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-11-30

Review 8.  Evolution of Human Brain Atlases in Terms of Content, Applications, Functionality, and Availability.

Authors:  Wieslaw L Nowinski
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2021-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.