Literature DB >> 29778369

Programming the endometrium for deferred transfer of cryopreserved embryos: hormone replacement versus modified natural cycles.

Eva R Groenewoud1, Bernard J Cohlen2, Nicholas S Macklon3.   

Abstract

Over the last decade the use of frozen-thawed embryo transfer has substantially increased, and currently up to one in two embryos transferred has been cryopreserved. To support implantation, endometrial and embryo maturity are required to be synchronized. This can be achieved in various ways. The most commonly applied endometrial preparation methods are the "natural cycle," in which the sequential estrogen and P necessary for endometrial maturation are derived from the developing follicle, and the "artificial" cycle, in which these are sequentially administered. Review of the published data comparing these approaches does not identify a superior approach in terms of clinical outcomes. However, although the "natural cycle" avoids the need for luteal support, the artificial cycle provides more control over timing of ET, and the "modified" natural cycle, in which ovulation is triggered exogenously, may offer both of these advantages. The optimal monitoring strategy for freeze-thaw cycles remains unclear, because only a few studies have addressed this question. Further studies are also required to determine the ideal dosage, method of administration, and duration of estrogen and P supplementation in artificial cycle frozen embryo transfer.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Artificial cycle; endometrium preparation; frozen–thawed embryo transfer; modified natural cycle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29778369     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  13 in total

1.  Natural cycles achieve better pregnancy outcomes than artificial cycles in non-PCOS women undergoing vitrified single-blastocyst transfer: a retrospective cohort study of 6840 cycles.

Authors:  Jing Li; Qian Sun; Meng Zhang; Xiao Fu; Yiting Zhang; Shanshan Gao; Jinlong Ma
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Evidence-Based Pre-Pregnancy Counseling for Oocyte Donation Pregnancies: a Systematic Review and Guide for Physicians.

Authors:  Marie-Louise van der Hoorn; Kim van Bentem; Eileen Lashley
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 3.  Algorithm-based individualization methodology of the starting gonadotropin dose in IVF/ICSI and the freeze-all strategy prevent OHSS equally in normal responders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the evidence.

Authors:  Angelo Marino; Salvatore Gullo; Francesca Sammartano; Aldo Volpes; Adolfo Allegra
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  The effect of mildly stimulated cycle versus artificial cycle on pregnancy outcomes in overweight/obese women with PCOS prior to frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lu Guan; Haicui Wu; Chaofeng Wei; Conghui Pang; Danqi Liu; Xiaona Yu; Shan Xiang; Fang Lian
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.105

5.  Does increasing estrogen dose during frozen embryo transfer affect pregnancy rate?

Authors:  Ranit Hizkiyahu; Eva Suarthana; Einav Kadour Peero; Ido Feferkorn; William Buckett
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  Seven Years of Vitrified Blastocyst Transfers: Comparison of 3 Preparation Protocols at a Single ART Center.

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele Levi Setti; Federico Cirillo; Raffaella De Cesare; Emanuela Morenghi; Valentina Canevisio; Camilla Ronchetti; Annamaria Baggiani; Antonella Smeraldi; Elena Albani; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.555

7.  Measuring the serum progesterone level on the day of transfer can be an additional tool to maximize ongoing pregnancies in single euploid frozen blastocyst transfers.

Authors:  Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin; Meral Gultomruk; Emre Turgut; Berfu Demir; Necati Findikli; Munevver Serdarogullari; Onder Coban; Zalihe Yarkiner; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 8.  The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  Ernesto Bosch; Michel De Vos; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Hormone Replacement Versus Natural Cycle Protocols of Endometrial Preparation for Frozen Embryo Transfer.

Authors:  Ye Pan; Bo Li; Ze Wang; Ying Wang; Xiaoshu Gong; Wenqing Zhou; Yuhua Shi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 10.  Freeze-all, for whom, when, and how.

Authors:  Paula Celada; Ernesto Bosch
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 2.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.