Literature DB >> 35551563

Algorithm-based individualization methodology of the starting gonadotropin dose in IVF/ICSI and the freeze-all strategy prevent OHSS equally in normal responders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the evidence.

Angelo Marino1, Salvatore Gullo2, Francesca Sammartano3, Aldo Volpes3, Adolfo Allegra3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) represents a rare but dangerous condition associated with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in IVF/ICSI. Over the last decades, many strategies have been introduced into clinical practice with the objective of preventing this potentially life-threatening condition. Among these, the freeze-all policy has gained great popularity, thanks to improvements in vitrification. Nevertheless, not all clinics have adequate skills in vitrification procedures and patients may be dissatisfied with a longer time to pregnancy.
METHODS: This study is a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing different strategies of ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles (freeze-all policy, algorithm-based individualization of the starting dose, experience-based individualization of the starting dose, standard dose) in terms of reduction of OHSS, in normal responders.
RESULTS: The results indicate that only the algorithm-based individualization of the starting gonadotropin dose reduces OHSS similarly to the freeze-all strategy.
CONCLUSION: Albeit in the era of the freeze-all policy, the personalization of the starting gonadotropin dose obtained by the use of algorithms should be pursued as a valid and safe option for IVF.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algorithm-based individualization of starting gonadotropin dose; Freeze-all policy; Normal responders

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35551563      PMCID: PMC9365921          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02503-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.357


  42 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial investigating the use of a predictive nomogram for the selection of the FSH starting dose in IVF/ICSI cycles.

Authors:  Adolfo Allegra; Angelo Marino; Aldo Volpes; Francesco Coffaro; Piero Scaglione; Salvatore Gullo; Antonio La Marca
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 2.  Advances in ovulation trigger strategies.

Authors:  Carlos Dosouto; Thor Haahr; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Panminerva Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.197

3.  Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 women.

Authors:  Nikolaos P Polyzos; Panagiotis Drakopoulos; Jose Parra; Antonio Pellicer; Samuel Santos-Ribeiro; Herman Tournaye; Ernesto Bosch; Juan Garcia-Velasco
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Transfer of Fresh versus Frozen Embryos in Ovulatory Women.

Authors:  Yuhua Shi; Yun Sun; Cuifang Hao; Heping Zhang; Daimin Wei; Yunshan Zhang; Yimin Zhu; Xiaohui Deng; Xiujuan Qi; Hong Li; Xiang Ma; Haiqin Ren; Yaqin Wang; Dan Zhang; Bo Wang; Fenghua Liu; Qiongfang Wu; Ze Wang; Haiyan Bai; Yuan Li; Yi Zhou; Mei Sun; Hong Liu; Jing Li; Lin Zhang; Xiaoli Chen; Songying Zhang; Xiaoxi Sun; Richard S Legro; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial.

Authors:  Anders Nyboe Andersen; Scott M Nelson; Bart C J M Fauser; Juan Antonio García-Velasco; Bjarke M Klein; Joan-Carles Arce
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Follitropin delta in repeated ovarian stimulation for IVF: a controlled, assessor-blind Phase 3 safety trial.

Authors:  Ernesto Bosch; Jon Havelock; Fernando Sánchez Martin; Birgitte Buur Rasmussen; Bjarke Mirner Klein; Bernadette Mannaerts; Joan-Carles Arce
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.828

7.  Individualized FSH dosing based on ovarian reserve testing in women starting IVF/ICSI: a multicentre trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Theodora C van Tilborg; Simone C Oudshoorn; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Monique H Mochtar; Ron J T van Golde; Annemieke Hoek; Walter K H Kuchenbecker; Kathrin Fleischer; Jan Peter de Bruin; Henk Groen; Madelon van Wely; Cornelis B Lambalk; Joop S E Laven; Ben Willem J Mol; Frank J M Broekmans; Helen L Torrance
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Peter Jüni; David Moher; Andrew D Oxman; Jelena Savovic; Kenneth F Schulz; Laura Weeks; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-18

9.  Forming research questions.

Authors:  R Brian Haynes
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 10.  Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

Authors:  Sarah F Lensen; Jack Wilkinson; Jori A Leijdekkers; Antonio La Marca; Ben Willem J Mol; Jane Marjoribanks; Helen Torrance; Frank J Broekmans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.