Literature DB >> 29777460

A tale of two countries: comparing disability weights for gambling problems in New Zealand and Australia.

Vijay Rawat1, Matthew Browne2, Maria Bellringer3, Nancy Greer2, Komathi Kolandai-Matchett3, Matthew Rockloff2, Erika Langham2, Christine Hanley2, Katie Palmer Du Preez3, Max Abbott3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the impact of gambling problems on quality of life. Specifically, we generated disability weight estimates for gambling problems in New Zealand, and compared these results with (i) Australian figures (J Gambl Issues, 10.4309/jgi.v0i36.3978, 2017) and (ii) other health states (Lancet, 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61680-8, 2013); such as anxiety and alcohol use disorders.
METHOD: The 324 participants (48 experts and 276 general population members) evaluated a series of gambling harm vignettes. The participants rated the decrement to one's quality of life using Visual Analogue Scale and Time Trade-Off protocols (Br Med Bull, 10.1093/bmb/ldq033, 2010). These evaluations enabled the calculation of disability weights for three categories of gamblers (low-risk, moderate-risk, and problem gamblers).
RESULTS: Disability weight estimates for low-risk, moderate-risk, and problem gamblers in NZ were consistently higher than the Australian weights: low (0.18 vs. 0.13), moderate (0.37 vs. 0.29), and problem (0.54 vs. 0.44). The quality of life impact for problem gambling in NZ (0.54) was comparable to that experienced in severe alcohol use disorder (0.55) (Lancet, 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61680-8, 2013).
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the first attempts to assess gambling-related harm through a public health perspective. The results of this study are informative for policy-making, resource allocation, and service planning. These estimates now allow for the population-level impact of gambling in NZ to be calculated and tracked over time, which is essential for informing harm-minimisation initiatives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disability weights; Gambling; Health-related quality of life; Time trade-off; Visual analogue scale

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29777460     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1882-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  20 in total

Review 1.  Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities.

Authors:  Sarah J Whitehead; Shehzad Ali
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  The validity of a visual analogue scale in determining social utility weights for health states.

Authors:  E Nord
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  1991 Jul-Sep

3.  Problem gambling: we should measure harm rather than 'cases'.

Authors:  Alex Blaszczynski
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  How the causes, consequences and solutions for problem gambling are reported in Australian newspapers: a qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Helen E Miller; Samantha L Thomas; Priscilla Robinson; Mike Daube
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.939

5.  Breaking Bad: Comparing Gambling Harms Among Gamblers and Affected Others.

Authors:  En Li; Matthew Browne; Vijay Rawat; Erika Langham; Matthew Rockloff
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2017-03

Review 6.  Review of disability weight studies: comparison of methodological choices and values.

Authors:  Juanita A Haagsma; Suzanne Polinder; Alessandro Cassini; Edoardo Colzani; Arie H Havelaar
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2014-08-23

7.  Common values in assessing health outcomes from disease and injury: disability weights measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Joshua A Salomon; Theo Vos; Daniel R Hogan; Michael Gagnon; Mohsen Naghavi; Ali Mokdad; Nazma Begum; Razibuzzaman Shah; Muhammad Karyana; Soewarta Kosen; Mario Reyna Farje; Gilberto Moncada; Arup Dutta; Sunil Sazawal; Andrew Dyer; Jason Seiler; Victor Aboyans; Lesley Baker; Amanda Baxter; Emelia J Benjamin; Kavi Bhalla; Aref Bin Abdulhak; Fiona Blyth; Rupert Bourne; Tasanee Braithwaite; Peter Brooks; Traolach S Brugha; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Rachelle Buchbinder; Peter Burney; Bianca Calabria; Honglei Chen; Sumeet S Chugh; Rebecca Cooley; Michael H Criqui; Marita Cross; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Nabila Dahodwala; Adrian Davis; Louisa Degenhardt; Cesar Díaz-Torné; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Karen Edmond; Alexis Elbaz; Majid Ezzati; Valery Feigin; Cleusa P Ferri; Abraham D Flaxman; Louise Flood; Marlene Fransen; Kana Fuse; Belinda J Gabbe; Richard F Gillum; Juanita Haagsma; James E Harrison; Rasmus Havmoeller; Roderick J Hay; Abdullah Hel-Baqui; Hans W Hoek; Howard Hoffman; Emily Hogeland; Damian Hoy; Deborah Jarvis; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Lisa Marie Knowlton; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; Stephen S Lim; Steven E Lipshultz; Alan D Lopez; Rafael Lozano; Ronan Lyons; Reza Malekzadeh; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; David J Margolis; Neil McGill; John McGrath; George A Mensah; Ana-Claire Meyer; Catherine Michaud; Andrew Moran; Rintaro Mori; Michele E Murdoch; Luigi Naldi; Charles R Newton; Rosana Norman; Saad B Omer; Richard Osborne; Neil Pearce; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Norberto Perico; Konrad Pesudovs; David Phillips; Farshad Pourmalek; Martin Prince; Jürgen T Rehm; Guiseppe Remuzzi; Kathryn Richardson; Robin Room; Sukanta Saha; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Maria Segui-Gomez; Saeid Shahraz; Kenji Shibuya; David Singh; Karen Sliwa; Emma Smith; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Timothy Steiner; Wilma A Stolk; Lars Jacob Stovner; Christopher Sudfeld; Hugh R Taylor; Imad M Tleyjeh; Marieke J van der Werf; Wendy L Watson; David J Weatherall; Robert Weintraub; Marc G Weisskopf; Harvey Whiteford; James D Wilkinson; Anthony D Woolf; Zhi-Jie Zheng; Christopher J L Murray; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  How do medical students value health on the EQ-5D? Evaluation of hypothetical health states compared to the general population.

Authors:  Maria-Theresa Barbist; Daniela Renn; Bianca Noisternig; Gerhard Rumpold; Stefan Höfer
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Disability adjusted life years and minimal disease: application of a preference-based relevance criterion to rank enteric pathogens.

Authors:  Juanita A Haagsma; Arie H Havelaar; Bas Mf Janssen; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2008-12-29

Review 10.  Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms.

Authors:  Erika Langham; Hannah Thorne; Matthew Browne; Phillip Donaldson; Judy Rose; Matthew Rockloff
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in the Conceptualisation and Measurement of Gambling-Related Harm.

Authors:  Paul Delfabbro; Daniel L King
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2019-09

Review 2.  The Evolution of Gambling-Related Harm Measurement: Lessons from the Last Decade.

Authors:  Matthew Browne; Vijay Rawat; Catherine Tulloch; Cailem Murray-Boyle; Matthew Rockloff
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Benchmarking gambling screens to health-state utility: the PGSI and the SGHS estimate similar levels of population gambling-harm.

Authors:  Matthew Browne; Alex M T Russell; Stephen Begg; Matthew J Rockloff; En Li; Vijay Rawat; Nerilee Hing
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.135

4.  The prevention paradox applies to some but not all gambling harms: Results from a Finnish population-representative survey.

Authors:  Matthew Browne; Rachel Volberg; Matthew Rockloff; Anne H Salonen
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 6.756

5.  Adapting an Evidence-Based e-Learning Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program Into a Mobile App for People Experiencing Gambling-Related Problems: Formative Study.

Authors:  Gayl Humphrey; Joanna Ting Chu; Rebecca Ruwhiu-Collins; Stephanie Erick-Peleti; Nicki Dowling; Stephanie Merkouris; David Newcombe; Simone Rodda; Elsie Ho; Vili Nosa; Varsha Parag; Christopher Bullen
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-03-25

Review 6.  The Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling: A revised framework for understanding gambling harm.

Authors:  Margo Hilbrecht; David Baxter; Max Abbott; Per Binde; Luke Clark; David C Hodgins; Darrel Manitowabi; Lena Quilty; Jessika SpÅngberg; Rachel Volberg; Douglas Walker; Robert J Williams
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 6.756

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.