Literature DB >> 21037243

Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities.

Sarah J Whitehead1, Shehzad Ali.   

Abstract

The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) is routinely used as a summary measure of health outcome for economic evaluation, which incorporates the impact on both the quantity and quality of life. Key studies relating to the QALY and utility measurement are the sources of data. Areas of agreement include the need for a standard measure of health outcome to enable comparisons across different disease areas and populations, and the methods used for valuing health states in utility measurement. Areas of controversy include the limitation of the QALY approach in terms of the health benefits it can capture, its blindness towards equity concerns, the underlying theoretical assumptions and the most appropriate generic preference-based measure of utility. There is growing debate relating to whether a QALY is the same regardless of who accrues it, and also the issue as to who should value health states. Research is required to further enhance the QALY approach to deal with challenges relating to equity-weighted utility maximization and testing the validity of underlying assumptions. Issues around choosing between condition-specific measures and generic instruments also merit further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21037243     DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldq033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med Bull        ISSN: 0007-1420            Impact factor:   4.291


  260 in total

Review 1.  Utility scores for different health states related to depression: individual participant data analysis.

Authors:  Spyros Kolovos; Judith E Bosmans; Johanna M van Dongen; Birre van Esveld; Dorcas Magai; Annemieke van Straten; Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis; Kirsten M van Steenbergen-Weijenburg; Klaas M Huijbregts; Harm van Marwijk; Heleen Riper; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  [AN EVALUATION OF JUSTICE AND RIGHT TO HEALTH CONCEPTS IN THE PERSPECTIVES OF ETHICAL THEORIES].

Authors:  Perihan Elif Ekmekçi; Berna Arda
Journal:  Turk Klin Tip Etigi Hukuku Tarihi       Date:  2015-04-29

Review 3.  Incorporating process utility into quality adjusted life years: a systematic review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Victoria K Brennan; Simon Dixon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Experience-Based Values: A Framework for Classifying Different Types of Experience in Health Valuation Research.

Authors:  Patricia Cubi-Molla; Koonal Shah; Kristina Burström
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Estimates of health utility scores in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Nigar Sekercioglu; Bryan Curtis; Sean Murphy; Gord Blackhouse; Brendan Barrett
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Predicting factors of health-related quality of life in octogenarians: a 3-year follow-up longitudinal study.

Authors:  Assumpta Ferrer; Francesc Formiga; Oriol Cunillera; M Jesús Megido; Xavier Corbella; Jesús Almeda
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  (Outcome) Measure for (Intervention) Measures: A Guide to Choosing the Appropriate Noninvasive Clinical Outcome Measure for Intervention Studies in Celiac Disease.

Authors:  Prashant Singh; Jocelyn A Silvester; Daniel Leffler
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.806

8.  Quality-of-life loss of people admitted to burn centers, United States.

Authors:  Ted Miller; Soma Bhattacharya; William Zamula; Dennis Lezotte; Karen Kowalske; David Herndon; James Fauerbach; Loren Engrav
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  An extended stroke rehabilitation service for people who have had a stroke: the EXTRAS RCT.

Authors:  Lisa Shaw; Nawaraj Bhattarai; Robin Cant; Avril Drummond; Gary A Ford; Anne Forster; Richard Francis; Katie Hills; Denise Howel; Anne Marie Laverty; Christopher McKevitt; Peter McMeekin; Christopher Price; Elaine Stamp; Eleanor Stevens; Luke Vale; Helen Rodgers
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  EQ-5D Health Utility Scores: Data from a Comprehensive Canadian Cancer Centre.

Authors:  Hiten Naik; Doris Howell; Susie Su; Xin Qiu; M Catherine Brown; Ashlee Vennettilli; Margaret Irwin; Vivien Pat; Hannah Solomon; Tian Wang; Henrique Hon; Lawson Eng; Mary Mahler; Henry Thai; Valerie Ho; Wei Xu; Soo Jin Seung; Nicole Mittmann; Geoffrey Liu
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.