Literature DB >> 29776093

Impact of hydrodynamic interactions on protein folding rates depends on temperature.

Fabio C Zegarra1,2, Dirar Homouz1,2,3, Yossi Eliaz1,2, Andrei G Gasic1,2, Margaret S Cheung1,2.   

Abstract

We investigated the impact of hydrodynamic interactions (HI) on protein folding using a coarse-grained model. The extent of the impact of hydrodynamic interactions, whether it accelerates, retards, or has no effect on protein folding, has been controversial. Together with a theoretical framework of the energy landscape theory (ELT) for protein folding that describes the dynamics of the collective motion with a single reaction coordinate across a folding barrier, we compared the kinetic effects of HI on the folding rates of two protein models that use a chain of single beads with distinctive topologies: a 64-residue α/β chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 (CI2) protein, and a 57-residue β-barrel α-spectrin Src-homology 3 domain (SH3) protein. When comparing the protein folding kinetics simulated with Brownian dynamics in the presence of HI to that in the absence of HI, we find that the effect of HI on protein folding appears to have a "crossover" behavior about the folding temperature. This means that at a temperature greater than the folding temperature, the enhanced friction from the hydrodynamic solvents between the beads in an unfolded configuration results in lowered folding rate; conversely, at a temperature lower than the folding temperature, HI accelerates folding by the backflow of solvent toward the folded configuration of a protein. Additionally, the extent of acceleration depends on the topology of a protein: for a protein like CI2, where its folding nucleus is rather diffuse in a transition state, HI channels the formation of contacts by favoring a major folding pathway in a complex free energy landscape, thus accelerating folding. For a protein like SH3, where its folding nucleus is already specific and less diffuse, HI matters less at a temperature lower than the folding temperature. Our findings provide further theoretical insight to protein folding kinetic experiments and simulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29776093      PMCID: PMC6080349          DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.032402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E        ISSN: 2470-0045            Impact factor:   2.529


  48 in total

1.  How fast-folding proteins fold.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Hydrodynamic description of protein folding.

Authors:  Sergei F Chekmarev; Andrey Yu Palyanov; Martin Karplus
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Crystal structure of a Src-homology 3 (SH3) domain.

Authors:  A Musacchio; M Noble; R Pauptit; R Wierenga; M Saraste
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Obligatory steps in protein folding and the conformational diversity of the transition state.

Authors:  J C Martinez; M T Pisabarro; L Serrano
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1998-08

5.  Simple theory of protein folding kinetics.

Authors:  Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Protein folding in the hydrophobic-hydrophilic (HP) model is NP-complete.

Authors:  B Berger; T Leighton
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.479

7.  Molecular dynamics of protein A and a WW domain with a united-residue model including hydrodynamic interaction.

Authors:  Agnieszka G Lipska; Steven R Seidman; Adam K Sieradzan; Artur Giełdoń; Adam Liwo; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding.

Authors:  J D Bryngelson; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Landscape approaches for determining the ensemble of folding transition states: success and failure hinge on the degree of frustration.

Authors:  H Nymeyer; N D Socci; J N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Towards developing principles of protein folding and dynamics in the cell.

Authors:  Margaret S Cheung; Andrei G Gasic
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 2.  Amyloid Oligomers: A Joint Experimental/Computational Perspective on Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, Type II Diabetes, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Phuong H Nguyen; Ayyalusamy Ramamoorthy; Bikash R Sahoo; Jie Zheng; Peter Faller; John E Straub; Laura Dominguez; Joan-Emma Shea; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Alfonso De Simone; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Saeed Najafi; Son Tung Ngo; Antoine Loquet; Mara Chiricotto; Pritam Ganguly; James McCarty; Mai Suan Li; Carol Hall; Yiming Wang; Yifat Miller; Simone Melchionna; Birgit Habenstein; Stepan Timr; Jiaxing Chen; Brianna Hnath; Birgit Strodel; Rakez Kayed; Sylvain Lesné; Guanghong Wei; Fabio Sterpone; Andrew J Doig; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 60.622

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.