Literature DB >> 29771992

First description of Echinococcus ortleppi and cystic echinococcosis infection status in Chile.

Felipe Corrêa1, Caroll Stoore1, Pamina Horlacher1, Mauricio Jiménez1, Christian Hidalgo1, Cristian A Alvarez Rojas2,3, Guilherme Figueiredo Barros4, Henrique Bunselmeyer Ferreira4, Marcela Hernández5, Gonzalo Cabrera6, Rodolfo Paredes1.   

Abstract

Cystic echinococcosis (CE), a parasitic disease caused by the cestode Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato (s.l.), is a worldwide zoonotic infection. Although endemic in Chile, information on the molecular characteristics of CE in livestock remains scarce. Therefore we aimed to describe the status of infection with E. granulosus s.l. in cattle from central Chile and also to contribute to the study of the molecular epidemiology of this parasite. According to our results, the prevalence of CE is 18.84% in cattle, similar to previous reports from Chile, suggesting that the prevalence in Santiago Metropolitan area has not changed in the last 30 years. Most of the cysts were found only in lungs (51%), followed by concurrent infection in liver and lungs (30%), and only liver (19%). Molecular characterization of the genetic diversity and population structure of E. granulosus s.l. from cattle in central Chile was performed using a section of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) mitochondrial gene. E. granulosus sensu stricto (s.s.) (G1-G3 genotypes) was confirmed by RFLP-PCR to be the dominant species affecting cattle (284 samples/290 samples); we also report for the first time in Chile the presence of E. ortleppi (G5 genotype) (2 samples/61 samples). The Chilean E. granulosus s.s. parsimony network displayed 1 main haplotype. Additional studies using isolates from many locations across Chile and different intermediate hosts will provide more data on the molecular structure of E. granulosus s.s. within this region. Likewise, investigations of the importance of E. ortleppi in human infection in Chile deserve future attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29771992      PMCID: PMC5957416          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Genotyping of human and livestock CE is useful to assess the information on parasite transmission patterns for epidemiological purposes and detection of species or genotypes that can infect humans. Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato (s.l.) is composed of: E. granulosus sensu stricto (s.s.; G1/G2/G3 genotypes), E. equinus (G4 genotype), E. ortleppi (G5 genotype), E. canadensis (G6/G7/G8/G10 genotypes) and E. felidis (‘lion strain’) [1]. Moreover a high variability has been discovered within species of the E. granulosus s.l. complex when sequencing longer fragments of DNA. For example based on full length of the cox and/or nad genes multiple haplotypes exist within E. granulosus s.s [2], E. ortleppi [3] and E. canadensis G6/7 [4]. Molecular data for the investigation of genotypes of E. granulosus s.l. in Chile is limited; while E. granulosus s.s. has been reported in humans and cattle [5-8], E. canadensis (G6) was reported in 1 human sample [5]; other genotypes or species have never been described so far. While E. granulosus s.s. is also the most common genotype found in Chilean neighbor countries, E. ortleppi is the second most common and has been reported in Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil [1] suggesting that it could also be present in Chile. Cystic echinococosis (CE), also known as hydatid disease, is a zoonotic disease with worldwide distribution [9-12]. It is caused by the larval stage of E. granulosus s.l., a cestode parasite able to infect a variety of intermediate hosts, including livestock, such as sheep, goats, cattle, camels, buffaloes and pigs, and also humans [13]. The hydatid cysts of E. granulosus s.l. develop as unilocular fluid-filled bladders within the infected internal organs (mainly liver and lungs) of the intermediate hosts. In South America, CE is endemic in the Andean and South regions, including South of Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay and Peru [12, 13]. The epidemiological status in South America is not fully understood and broad data is scarce, especially in Uruguay and Chile [1]. In Chile, according to national surveillance data, the surgical incidence has remained steady at around 2/100,000 inhabitants since the early 1990s. However, based on hospital discharge records of patients who underwent surgical treatment, the incidence was 4.68-5/100,000 inhabitants in the period 2009–2014, this difference supports several authors who have suggested the existence of sub notification of this disease in Chile [14-16]. In human patients in Chile, CE is responsible for direct monetary costs estimated in US$ 7,379 per patient in a private clinic, which involves diagnosis, hospitalization and treatment[16]. In cattle, the annual number of CE confirmed cases remains stable ranging between 18–20% of total cattle slaughtered within the last 2 years, ranked as the second cause of offal condemnation in this species after the infection with Fasciola hepatica (fascioliasis)[17]. In livestock the largest economic impacts of CE have been suggested to be productivity losses and costs for condemnation of viscera at meat inspection [10, 18–21]. By the year of 2011, in Chile it was estimated a loss of US$ 1,449,931 only caused by liver condemnation in cattle [16]. In Chile, a number of high risk behaviors/factors that favors the transmission of the parasite remain present. Deficient responsibility in dog ownership [16], absence of treatment of dogs against helminths, permanence of habit of feeding dogs with uncooked offal, high rates of echinococcosis in dogs and more importantly, home slaughter [22] are considerable elements that favor the risk of exposure to CE. Despite its great economic and public health significance, CE receives little attention in Chile [23, 24]. Thus, the objective of the present study was to characterize the prevalence, organ distribution and fertility of hydatids in cattle, and to enlarge our knowledge on the molecular identity of E. granulosus s.l. infecting this important livestock species slaughtered in Santiago, Chile.

Materials and methods

Study design

A descriptive study was conducted to determine the prevalence, organ distribution and characteristics of hydatid cysts in cattle at a slaughterhouse in Santiago, Chile. The Universidad Andres Bello Bioethics Board approved the study protocol (protocol number 016/2016). For this reason, one slaughtering-day visit per week was scheduled from July 2013 to June 2015. It is important to take into account that animals slaughtered in Santiago could have been originated from the same region or its southern area. The internal organs (lungs, liver, heart, spleen and kidney) of slaughtered animals were carefully examined by official veterinarian inspectors for the presence CE (and other pathologies). Age and sex of each animal was recorded; two age-based groups were distinguished: Group 1 (≤4 years old) and Group 2 (>4 years old). Cysts found were removed from each infected organ and transported in iced boxes within 2 hours to the laboratory for further examination. To evaluate cyst fertility, cysts were inspected for the presence of protoscoleces [25]. Protoscoleces and/or germinal layer from both fertile and infertile cysts were washed three times with sterile saline solution, fixed in 70% ethanol and stored at 4°C until genomic DNA isolation.

Data analysis

Data was entered into a Microsoft Excel 2010 database, followed by analysis using SPSS V.15. The Chi-squared test was used to compare the prevalence of hydatid cysts among cattle of different age and sex. Confidence intervals were calculated using Graphpad Prism 6. A statistically significant association between variables is considered to exist if the p value is <0.05.

Molecular and sequence analysis

Protoscoleces and/or germinal layers from each individual cyst were washed five times in sterile-distilled water by centrifugation to remove the ethanol, and genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted using a DNA Purification System Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Concentration of each DNA sample was measured using Take3 micro-volume plate (Biotek Synergy™, Winooski, VT, USA), and they were stored at -20°C until PCR amplification. A 444-bp fragment of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) was amplified using a gene specific pair of primers (5’-TTTTTTGGGCATCCTGAGGTTTAT-3’) and (5’-TAAAGAAAGAACATAATGAAAATG-3’) [26]. Amplification was carried out in a 25 μl final volume containing 50–100 ng of gDNA, 200 μM of dNTP mix, 3 mM of MgCl2, 10 pmol of each primer, and 1.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase. PCR amplification of isolated DNA samples plus positive and negative controls was performed in a thermocycler (Mastercycler, Eppendorf, Germany) under the following cycling conditions: initial denaturation cycle at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 55 s at 94°C, 55 s at 54°C and 60 s at 72°C with a final step at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were later analyzed by electrophoresis on 1.2% agarose gels, stained with SYBR safe and visualized under UV light (G:BOX, Syngene). In order to determine if the samples were only E.granulosus s.s., the positive samples to PCR were then subjected to PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (PCR-RFLP) with 10 U of the AluI restriction endonuclease for 4 h, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Fermentas, Germany), in a final volume of 20 μl. The restriction fragments were fractionated in 1.2% agarose gels, stained with SYBR safe and visualized under a UV light (G:BOX, Syngene). PCR-RFLP patterns were compared with reference patterns for E. granulosus s.s [27]. The PCR products of cox1 were purified and subjected to sequencing with both primers used for amplification. The acquired sequences were manually inspected and aligned using Geneious (version 8.0.4) (http://www.geneious.com, [28]) with reference sequences for each genotype: G1 and G3 complete mitochondrial E. granulosus s.s. genome (AB786664, KJ559023), G2 mitochondrial E. granulosus s.s. gene sequences (AJ237633, M84662), G5 mitochondrial E.ortleppi gene sequence (M84665) and G6 and G7 complete mitochondrial E. canadensis genome (AB208063, AB235847). A network of cox1 mitochondrial haplotype using statistical parsimony was drawn by TCS 1.2 software [29] for an schematic representation of the diversity and relationships among the different haplotypes found.

Results

Prevalence

From 2,961 cattle examined, the overall prevalence of CE was 18.84% (CI95% 17.45–20.30) (Table 1). Cyst prevalence was significantly higher in cattle over 4 years old compared to those under 4 years of age (χ2 = 141.6, p<0.0001), and also between the same age ranges in males (χ2 = 18.36, p< 0.0001) and females (χ2 = 94.83, p<0.0001). Even though there is a significant difference in the prevalence regarding sex (χ2 = 29.45, p<0.0001), no difference was found between male and female cattle of the same age ranges (Females: χ2 = 0.0066, p = 0.9355; Males: χ2 = 0.01381; p = 0.9065).
Table 1

CE prevalence by sex and age, in cattle slaughtered Santiago, Chile.

 ExaminedInfectedPrevalence % [CI95%]χ2p
Overall296155818.84 [17.45–20.30]
Age range
    <4 years221330713.87 [12.46–15.38]141.6<0.0001*
    >4 years74825133.56 [30.18–37.07]
Sex
    Female47113127.81 [23.81–32.1]29.45< 0.0001*
    Male249042717.15 [15.69–18.69]
Sex in each age range
    <4 years:Female1321813.64 [8.29–20.69]a0.00660.9355
Male208128913.89 [12.43–15.49]b
    >4 years:Female33911333.33 [28.33–38.5]a0.013810.9065
Male40913833.74 [29.19–38.5]b

Results expressed as absolute or relative (%) frequencies.

CI: Confidence interval

*: statistically significant difference (p<0,05)

a: Significant difference between females of different age range (χ2 = 18.36; p< 0.0001)

b: Significant difference between males of different age range (χ2 = 94.83; p<0.0001)

Results expressed as absolute or relative (%) frequencies. CI: Confidence interval *: statistically significant difference (p<0,05) a: Significant difference between females of different age range (χ2 = 18.36; p< 0.0001) b: Significant difference between males of different age range (χ2 = 94.83; p<0.0001)

Organ distribution and cysts characterization

From the total 558 cattle harboring one or more hydatid cysts in their internal organs, 284 had cysts only in their lungs (51%), 108 only in their livers (19%), while the rest of the 168 infected cattle (30%) had concurrent infection in both organs. The analysis of fertility revealed that 430 cysts were infertile (79%) and 29 fertile (6%). For 101 (15%) cysts the fertility test was not performed due to their small size (diameters smaller than 1.5 cm). The highest proportion of fertile cysts occurred in the lungs of infected cattle.

Molecular cyst characterization

Partial PCR amplification of cox1 yielded an expected 444-bp fragment for 290 of all the DNA samples of hydatid cysts characterized by PCR-RFLP, which resulted in 98% (284/290) identified as E. granulosus s.s. (G1/G2/G3 genotypes), while 2%(6/290) of the samples were identified as G4-G10 genotypes (Table 2).
Table 2

Echinococcus species in cattle hydatid cysts detected in the present study based on restriction length polymorphism-PCR analysis.

Species identified by molecular analysisNo. isolatesOrgan
LiverLungs
E. granulosus s.s. (G1,G2,G3)28486198
Other E. granulosus s.l. species (G4-G10)624
Total290
To confirm the identified genotypes, 61 samples were sequenced for cox1 mtDNA. From the cox1 nucleotide sequences obtained from DNA isolates, a 345-nucleotide consensus sequence was used for comparative analysis. Alignments of the sequences determined herein with those of known genotypes of E. granulosus revealed the existence of 59 E. granulosus s.s. (G1-G3) and 2 E. ortleppi (G5) samples out of 61 in the studied area. In total, 11 different haplotypes were detected among the 59 E. granulosus s.s. isolates and were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers MF421702-MF421712, while an unique haplotype was identified among the 2 E. ortleppi isolates, and it was deposited in GenBank under the accession number MF421713 (S1 Fig).

Discussion

The 18.84% prevalence for CE in cattle in the present study is similar to previous reports from Chile [30-32]. Interestingly, the report by Luengo and Olivares [30] was based on samples obtained from the same area included in our study, suggesting that the prevalence in Santiago Metropolitan area has not changed in the last 30 years. A higher prevalence of CE in old cattle (>4 years) compared to young ones (<4 years) was observed in the present study, which is similar to other reports [33-35]. Several studies have suggested that this difference can be explained by the prolonged exposure of older animals to a larger number of infective stages of the parasite, favoring the development of cysts [36-38]. In our study, the largest proportion of hydatid cysts occurred in the lungs rather than other organs, which is in agreement with previous publications in different countries: 63.7% [37] and 57.8%[39] in Iran, 55.2% [40] and 71.6% [38] in Ethiopia, 93.8% in Argentina and 81.2% in Spain [41], and 77.7% in Brazil [42]. But in disagreement with other investigations in where the liver is the most common location for the cyst; 61.8% in Sudan [43] and 62.58% in Tunisia [33]. The cattle slaughtered age and the hydatids strains variations could be attributable as the cause for this difference. Also, it has been suggested that liver capillaries have widened in older animals, which allows most oncospheres to pass from the liver to the lungs [44]. Our overall finding of 79% of hydatid cysts were infertile are comparable to results obtained by Negash et al. in which 71.5% were infertile [38], Pednekar et al. with 81.25% [45], and Balbinotti et al. with 91.2% of infertile cysts [42]. This low fertility frequency supports previous arguments proposed by several researchers that consider sheep to have a greater role as an intermediate host of cystic echinococcosis rather than cattle [46, 47]. Interestingly, a study conducted in Sudan demonstrated a higher (77%) fertility rate of hydatid cyst in cattle, corresponding mostly to G6 and G5 strain [43]. However, the findings in the present study of a high overall prevalence (in 18.84% of cattle) and fertility of 6%, is in line with previous reports (16.4 infected/14.2% fertility) [18, 37, 48], implying that cattle are still important as a source of infection to the definitive hosts of this parasite. In the present study, lungs were the most common organ for the development of fertile hydatids, which is in agreement with previous reports (14% fertility in lungs)[48, 49]. Its been suggested that the softer consistency of lung tissue compared with other organs possibly favors the development and fertility of cysts [48, 49]. Nevertheless, this finding is in contrast with other report [20]; which can be explained by the presence of different E.granulosus s.l strains in each location [18, 39, 44, 50]. To date, only E. granulosus s.s. has been reported in intermediate hosts in Chile: G1 in cattle [6] and humans [5]; G3 in cattle [6]; a number of haplotypes of E. granulosus s.s. [8] and E. canadensis G6 in a single human isolate [5]. In the present study, the G1-G3 cluster and microvariants of this group was predominant (61/63) among all the isolates studied. This is in agreement with the broad distribution of this species since the G1-G3 complex is the most frequent genotype identified in livestock [51-53] and humans [54]. Although in some countries of North Africa such as Sudan and Mauritania, G6 is the most common genotype in sheep, cattle, camels and human [43, 55]. In the present study, genetic characterization of E. granulosus isolates employing mitochondrial cox1 sequences revealed that the E. ortleppi is also present in cattle in Chile. To our knowledge, this is the first report of E. ortleppi infection in any intermediate host in Chile, which sets the basis to further explore whether E. ortleppi is also responsible for human infection as reported in other countries. The structure of the parsimony network generated using the 59 cox1 E. granulosus G1 isolates consisted of 11 haplotypes (MF421702-MF421713), MF421707 being the most dominant with 43 isolates. A BLAST search showed that the sequence of the haplotype MF421707, had a 100% identity with those of the globally distributed E. granulosus s.s haplotype described from Egypt [56], United Kingdon [57], Tunisia [58], Mongolia [59], Russia [60]. In conclusion, the findings reported here show that CE is widespread in cattle in Santiago and its Southern area. Our results shows that cattle may have an important role in the life cycle of this zoonotic disease and highlight the presence of potential hazards of transmission to the human population and other intermediate hosts of the studied area. More importantly we detect the presence of E. ortleppi in Chile for the first time, further epidemiological studies on the abundance of this species and its role in human infection in Chile is needed.

Haplotypes network of cox1 mtDNA (345bp).

The network depicts 11 haplotypes of E. granulosus s.s. corresponding to 59 of the isolates that were analyzed, and 1 haplotype of E. ortleppi. The size of each figure is proportional to the frequency to the respective haplotype found. Each mutation event is represented through on the lines by a dash. (TIFF) Click here for additional data file.
  53 in total

1.  Major metacestodes in cattle slaughtered at Wolaita Soddo Municipal abattoir, Southern Ethiopia: prevalence, cyst viability, organ distribution and socioeconomic implications.

Authors:  A Regassa; F Abunna; A Mulugeta; B Megersa
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Implementation of new tools in molecular epidemiology studies of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in South America.

Authors:  Héctor G Avila; Guilherme B Santos; Marcela A Cucher; Natalia Macchiaroli; Matías G Pérez; Germán Baldi; Oscar Jensen; Verónica Pérez; Raúl López; Perla Negro; Exequiel Scialfa; Arnaldo Zaha; Henrique B Ferreira; Mara Rosenzvit; Laura Kamenetzky
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  High intraspecific variability of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in Chile.

Authors:  Cristian A Alvarez Rojas; Dennis Ebi; Rodolfo Paredes; Gerardo Acosta-Jamett; Nicole Urriola; Juan Carlos Roa; Carlos Manterola; Sandra Cortes; Thomas Romig; Jean-Pierre Scheerlinck; Marshall W Lightowlers
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 4.  Ecology and Life Cycle Patterns of Echinococcus Species.

Authors:  T Romig; P Deplazes; D Jenkins; P Giraudoux; A Massolo; P S Craig; M Wassermann; K Takahashi; M de la Rue
Journal:  Adv Parasitol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.870

5.  [Echinococcosis/hydatidosis in the VII Region of Chile: diagnosis and educational intervention].

Authors:  W Apt; C Pérez; E Galdamez; S Campano; F Vega; D Vargas; J Rodríguez; C Retamal; P Cortés; I Zulantay; P H de Rycke
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2000-01

Review 6.  Cystic echinococcosis in South America: systematic review of species and genotypes of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in humans and natural domestic hosts.

Authors:  Marcela Alejandra Cucher; Natalia Macchiaroli; Germán Baldi; Federico Camicia; Laura Prada; Lucas Maldonado; Héctor Gabriel Avila; Adolfo Fox; Ariana Gutiérrez; Perla Negro; Raúl López; Oscar Jensen; Mara Rosenzvit; Laura Kamenetzky
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Genetic diversity and phylogeography of highly zoonotic Echinococcus granulosus genotype G1 in the Americas (Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico) based on 8279bp of mtDNA.

Authors:  Teivi Laurimäe; Liina Kinkar; Vanessa Andresiuk; Karen Luisa Haag; Francisco Ponce-Gordo; Gerardo Acosta-Jamett; Teresa Garate; Luis Miguel Gonzàlez; Urmas Saarma
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.342

8.  Genetic variability and haplotypes of Echinococcus isolates from Tunisia.

Authors:  Belgees Boufana; Samia Lahmar; Waël Rebaï; Zoubeir Ben Safta; Leïla Jebabli; Adel Ammar; Mahmoud Kachti; Soufia Aouadi; Philip S Craig
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.184

9.  Epidemiological study of the cystic echinococcosis in Morocco.

Authors:  Rkia Azlaf; Allal Dakkak
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 2.738

10.  Molecular characterization of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato from farm animals in Egypt.

Authors:  Said Amer; Ibrahim B Helal; Evelyne Kamau; Yaoyu Feng; Lihua Xiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on prevalence and distribution of Taenia and Echinococcus infections in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Nigus Abebe Shumuye; John Asekhaen Ohiolei; Mebrahtu Berhe Gebremedhin; Hong-Bin Yan; Li Li; Wen-Hui Li; Nian-Zhang Zhang; Bao-Quan Fu; Wan-Zhong Jia
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  Genetic Characterization of Echinococcus granulosus Sensu Lato in Livestock and Human Isolates from North of Iran Indicates the Presence of E. ortleppi in Cattle.

Authors:  Khadijeh Nematdoost; Keyhan Ashrafi; Bijan Majidi-Shad; Eshrat Beigom Kia; Arash Zeinali; Meysam Sharifdini
Journal:  Acta Parasitol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 1.440

3.  Multiple haplotypes of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in single naturally infected intermediate hosts.

Authors:  Christian Hidalgo; Caroll Stoore; Ismael Pereira; Rodolfo Paredes; Cristian A Alvarez Rojas
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  First description of Echinococcus ortleppi infection in China.

Authors:  Yunliang Shi; Xiaoling Wan; Ziyue Wang; Jun Li; Zhihua Jiang; Yichao Yang
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  Fasciola hepatica coinfection modifies the morphological and immunological features of Echinococcus granulosus cysts in cattle.

Authors:  Christian Hidalgo; Caroll Stoore; Marcela Hernández; Rodolfo Paredes
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.683

6.  Proteomic profiling of hydatid fluid from pulmonary cystic echinococcosis.

Authors:  Guilherme Brzoskowski Dos Santos; Edileuza Danieli da Silva; Eduardo Shigueo Kitano; Maria Eduarda Battistella; Karina Mariante Monteiro; Jeferson Camargo de Lima; Henrique Bunselmeyer Ferreira; Solange Maria de Toledo Serrano; Arnaldo Zaha
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Cystic echinococcosis in cattle slaughtered at a slaughterhouse in Gessa, southern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Mesfin Mathewos; Deneke Dawa; Metages Yirgalem; Tesfaye Denano; Haben Fesseha
Journal:  Parasite Epidemiol Control       Date:  2022-07-09

8.  Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato Genotypes in Different Hosts Worldwide: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carlos Manterola; Armando Totomoch-Serra; Claudio Rojas; Ángela L Riffo-Campos; Nayely García-Méndez
Journal:  Acta Parasitol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 1.440

9.  Echinococcus granulosus hydatid cyst location is modified by Fasciola hepatica infection in cattle.

Authors:  Caroll Stoore; Constanza Andrade; Christian Hidalgo; Felipe Corrêa; Mauricio Jiménez; Marcela Hernandez; Rodolfo Paredes
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Assessment of the Vaccination Program against Cystic Echinococcosis in Sheep in the Pehuenche Community of Central Chile.

Authors:  Paula Gädicke; David Heath; Angela Medina-Brunet; María Carolina Siva-de la Fuente; Hellen Espinoza-Rojas; Carmen Villaguala-Pacheco; Makarena Rubilar; Carolina Cerda; Manuel Quezada; Daniela Rojas; AnaLía Henríquez; Marco Loyola; Carlos Landaeta-Aqueveque
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.