| Literature DB >> 29770636 |
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes and factors associated with surgical failure in patients who underwent combined phacoemulsification and Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation.Entities:
Keywords: Cataract; Glaucoma; Glaucoma drainage implants; Phacoemulsification
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29770636 PMCID: PMC5990640 DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2017.0105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Ophthalmol ISSN: 1011-8942
Demographic characteristics of subjects
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation, number (%), or mean ± standard deviation (range).
Preoperative diagnosis for eyes that underwent combined phacoemulsification and Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation
*Other includes traumatic glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, glaucoma secondary to iridocorneal endothelial syndrome, and glaucoma secondary to penetrating keratoplasty.
Fig. 1Graph showing trends in mean intraocular pressure from preoperative to the last follow-up visit (error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals).
Intraocular pressure and number of antiglaucoma medications
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (%).
Fig. 2Kaplan-Meier survival curve with 95% confidence intervals for the total number of eyes undergoing combined phacoemulsification and Ahmed valve implantation.
Visual acuity, postoperative spherical equivalent, and comparison of refractive errors among various intraocular lens power calculation formulas
Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation (range).
VA = visual acuity; D = diopter.
*Six eyes in which myopic correction was performed were excluded; †Friedman test.
Postoperative complications after combined phacoemulsification and Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation
IOP = intraocular pressure.
Cox proportional hazards analysis with surgical failure as the dependent variable
HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; IOP = intraocular pressure.
Fig. 3Kaplan-Meier survival curves for eyes with and without postoperative tube-iris touch.