| Literature DB >> 29770231 |
Dhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay1, Kumar Ashish2, Adrija Hajra3, Arshna Qureshi4, Raktim K Ghosh5.
Abstract
PCSK9 inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, are novel antihypercholesterolemic drugs. FDA first approved them in July 2015. PCSK9 protein (692-amino acids) was discovered in 2003. It plays a major role in LDL receptor degradation and is a prominent modulator in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) metabolism. PCSK9 inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies that target PCSK9 protein in liver and inhibiting this protein leads to drastically lowering harmful LDL-C level in the bloodstream. Despite widespread use of the statin, not all the high-risk patients were able to achieve targeted level of LDL-C. Using PCSK9 inhibitors could lead to a substantial decrement in LDL-C plasma level ranging from 50% to 70%, either as a monotherapy or on top of statins. A large number of trials have shown robust reduction of LDL-C plasma level with the use of PCSK9 inhibitors as a monotherapy or in combination with statins in familial and nonfamilial forms of hypercholesterolemia. Moreover, PCSK9 inhibitors do not appear to increase the risk of hepatic and muscle-related side effects. PCSK9 inhibitors proved to be a highly potent and promising antihypercholesterolemic drug by decreasing LDL-R lysosomal degradation by PCSK9 protein. Statin drugs are known to have some pleiotropic effects. In this article, we are also focusing on the effects of PCSK9 inhibitor beyond LDL-C reduction like endothelial inflammation, atherosclerosis, its safety in patients with diabetes, obesity, and chronic kidney disease, and its influence on neurocognition and stroke.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29770231 PMCID: PMC5889852 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3179201
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Lipids ISSN: 2090-3049
Trials on alirocumab. A-mAb: alirocumab; ATV: atorvastatin; EZE: ezetimibe; RSV: rosuvastatin; ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CHD: coronary heart disease; heFH: heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.
| S. No | Trial | Participants | Comparison | LDL-C reduction | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | ODYSSEY MONO | Patients with hypercholesterolemia | A-mAb versus EZE | 47.2% versus 15.6% | - |
|
| |||||
| (2) | ODYSSEY COMBO I | Hypercholesterolemia + CHD or CHD equivalents, on treatment with maximal tolerated statin dose | A-mAb versus Placebo | 48.2% versus 2.3% | - |
|
| |||||
| (3) | ODYSSEY OPTIONS I | Hyperlipidemia + risk of ASCVD, on baseline treatment with ATV | ATV + A-mAb versus ATV + EZE versus ATV (double dose) versus RSV | 44.1% versus 20.5% versus 5.0% versus 21.4 % | - |
|
| |||||
| (4) | ODYSSEY OPTIONS II | Hyperlipidemia + risk of ASCVD, on baseline treatment with RSV | A-mAb versus EZE versus RSV | 50.6% versus 14.4% versus 16.3% | - |
|
| |||||
| (5) | ODYSSEY LONG TERM TRIAL | Hypercholesterolemia + risk of ASCVD, on treatment with maximally tolerated statin dose | A-mAb versus placebo | 61% versus 0.8% | - |
|
| |||||
| (6) | ODYSSEY FH I | Familial heterozygous hypercholesterolemia on maximally tolerated statin dose | A-mAb versus placebo | 57.9% reduction in A-Mab group | - |
|
| |||||
| (7) | ODYSSEY FH II | Familial heterozygous hypercholesterolemia on maximally tolerated statin dose | A-mAb versus placebo | 51.4% reduction in A-Mab group | - |
|
| |||||
| (8) | ODYSSEY COMBO II | Hypercholesterolemia + risk of ASCVD, on treatment with maximally tolerated statin dose | A-mAb versus EZE | 50.6% versus 20.7% | - |
|
| |||||
| (9) | ODYSSEY HIGH FH | Patients having heFH and LDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dl even after maximum tolerated dose of statin | A-mAb versus Placebo | 45.7% versus 6.6% | |
|
| |||||
| (9) | Phase 2 pooled analysis [ | Primary hypercholesterolemia on lipid lowering therapy | A-mAb versus placebo | 68.4% versus 10.5% | - |
|
| |||||
| (10) | Randomized | Hypercholesterolemia on treatment with ATV | A-mAb versus placebo | 40% to 70% versus 5% | - |
|
| |||||
| (11) | Pooled analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials | _ | A-mAb versus control (placebo or EZE) | LDL-C reduced to as low as 15 mg/dl in A-mAb group | Rates of adverse events in those achieving LDL-C < 25 mg/dl (72.7%) and <15 mg/dl (71.7%) were similar to those who did not (76.7%) |
Studies on evolocumab. E-mAb: evolocumab; EZE: ezetimibe; ATV: atorvastatin.
| S. No. | Trial | Participants | Comparison | LDL-C reduction | Adverse events (AE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | MENDEL-2 | Hypercholesterolemia | E-mAb versus Placebo versus EZE | Reduction in E-mab group; 55–57% more than placebo & 38–40% more than EZE | 44% versus 44% versus 46% |
|
| |||||
| (2) | DESCARATES | Hypercholesterolemia, on background therapy with diet or ATV (10 mg or 80 mg) or EZE singly or in combination. | E-mAb versus Placebo | 50.1% versus 6.8% | 74.8% versus 74.2% |
|
| |||||
| (3) | GAUSS-2 | Hypercholesterolemia | E-mAb versus EZE | 53–56% versus 37–39% | Muscle AE's; more frequent in EZE group (23%) versus |
|
| |||||
| (4) | RUTHERFORD-2 | Familial Hypercholesterolemia | E-mAb versus placebo | 60% in E-mAb group | Similar adverse events profile |
|
| |||||
| (5) | LAPLACE-2 | Hypercholesterolemia | E-mAb versus EZE versus Placebo | −66% to 75% in E-mAb group | 36% versus 40% versus 39% |
|
| |||||
| (6) | FOURIER | Patient with h/o CVD on maximum tolerated statin therapy but LDL is more than 70 mg/dl | E-mAb versus placebo in statin treated patients | 59% reduction of LDL in comparison to placebo | Primary end point. that is, Cv events was 9.8% versus 11.3%; |
|
| |||||
| (7) | OSLER I & OSLER II | Patients who completed “parent trials” of evolocumab and eligible patients were randomly assigned in 2 : 1 ratio to receive either evolocumab plus standard therapy or standard therapy alone | E-mAb versus standard therapy | 61% in E-mAb group. | 69.2% versus 64.8% |
Studies on bococizumab.
| S. number | Trial | Participants | Comparison | LDL reduction | Adverse events | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | Dose ranging trial ( | Those with LDL-C > 80 mg/dl on stable statin therapy | Bococizumab versus placebo | 54.2% versus 2.8% | Similar adverse events profile | Despite dose reduction in many subjects, bococizumab significantly reduced LDL-C across all the doses |
|
| ||||||
| (2) | SPIRE-1 and SPIRE-2 | Those with background lipid-lowering treatment and have an LDL-C of >/ = 70 mg/dl (SPIRE-1) or LDL-C >/ = 100 mg/dl (SPIRE-2) | Bococizumab versus placebo | This study has been terminated. | Bococizumab being a humanized monoclonal antibody, a strong immune response was seen against it which mitigate the LDL-C lowering effect. Anti-drug Ab was seen in 48% patients and neutralizing Ab developed in 29% patients | |