Literature DB >> 25256660

A randomized study of the relative pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of alirocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, after single subcutaneous administration at three different injection sites in healthy subjects.

Catherine Lunven1, Tobias Paehler, Franck Poitiers, Aurélie Brunet, Jacques Rey, Corinne Hanotin, William J Sasiela.   

Abstract

AIMS: We investigated the relative pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor alirocumab following injection at three different sites.
METHODS: Sixty healthy subjects (39 male, 21 female; age 20-45 years) were randomized to receive a single subcutaneous injection of alirocumab 75 mg via 1-mL prefilled pen into the abdomen, upper arm, or thigh (NCT01785329). Subjects were followed for 85 days ± 2 days following study drug administration. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for the systemic exposure of alirocumab were calculated, and levels of free PCSK9 were assessed. Percentage changes from baseline in LDL-C were compared between injection site groups using linear mixed-effects models.
RESULTS: Alirocumab concentration-time profiles were similar, and free PCSK9 levels were reduced to approximately zero between Day 3 and Day 4 postinjection in all groups. LDL-C levels reached nadir on Day 15 postinjection in all groups with mean percentage reductions of 48.4% (abdomen), 39.5% (upper arm), and 45.6% (thigh) at this time point. A similar effect on LDL-C levels was seen across the entire time course of the study at all three injection sites. Treatment-emergent adverse events were experienced by 8/20 (abdomen), 11/20 (upper arm), and 13/20 (thigh) subjects. There were 2 mild/transient injection site reactions. There were no serious adverse events. DISCUSSION: A single subcutaneous administration of alirocumab 75 mg via prefilled pen was well tolerated with similar pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics when injected into the abdomen, upper arm, or thigh.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that alirocumab can be interchangeably injected in the abdomen, upper arm, or thigh.
© 2014 Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. Cardiovascular Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alirocumab; Cholesterol; Low-density lipoprotein; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25256660      PMCID: PMC4262094          DOI: 10.1111/1755-5922.12093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther        ISSN: 1755-5914            Impact factor:   3.023


Introduction

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is a protease that mediates degradation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors 1. By its effect of increasing the numbers of LDL receptors, inhibition of PCSK9 is being investigated as a means of reducing levels of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C). Alirocumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to and inhibits PCSK9. In Phase 2 studies, alirocumab administered every 2 weeks at a dose of 150 mg reduced LDL-C by up to 72% when combined with statins ± ezetimibe, with the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) being transient injection site reactions of mild intensity and short duration 2–4. In these studies, all patients received alirocumab injections in the abdomen; however, patients may prefer to use different injection sites. Here, we report the relative pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of alirocumab after single subcutaneous (SC) administration of 75 mg into the abdomen, upper arm, and thigh of healthy subjects.

Methods

Study Design and Population

This was an open-label, randomized, Phase 1 study conducted in healthy subjects aged 18–45 years with LDL-C levels >95 mg/dL (2.46 mmol/L) not receiving background lipid-lowering therapy. The study was conducted at the Hammersmith Medicines Research Clinical Research Unit in London, UK (NCT01785329). The protocol was approved by the Scotland A Research Ethics Committee, Edinburgh, Scotland, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Subjects were randomized to one of the three parallel groups and received a single 75 mg dose of alirocumab SC via 1-mL prefilled pen at one of the three distinct sites (abdomen, upper arm, and thigh) in the morning on Day 1. Samples for PK and PD analyses (including free PCSK9 and LDL-C assessments) were collected following a 10-h fast predose on Day 1, and at various time points up to Day 85 (±2 days, end of the study). The primary objective was to compare the relative PK of a single SC dose of alirocumab 75 mg administered at three different injection sites in healthy subjects. Additional objectives included assessments of the effect of a single SC dose of alirocumab on serum LDL-C, other lipid parameters, free PCSK9 levels, and safety. Alirocumab and free PCSK9 serum concentrations were determined using validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays with lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) of 78 and 31.2 ng/mL, respectively. PK parameters for the systemic exposure of alirocumab, calculated using noncompartmental methods, included maximum serum concentration (Cmax), area under the serum concentration versus time curve (AUC), and AUC from time zero to time of last concentration above LLOQ (AUClast). LDL-C was calculated using the Friedewald formula 5. Total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TGs), apolipoprotein (apo) B, and apoA1 were measured directly. Safety assessments included TEAEs, especially local tolerability (injection site reactions). TEAEs were defined as any AE occurring from the time of alirocumab administration up to the end of the study visit.

Statistical Analyses

A sample size of 20 subjects per group was calculated to be sufficient to obtain an estimate for the ratio of PK parameters between groups with a maximum imprecision of 19.7% and 90% assurance in terms of the 90% confidence interval (CI), and assuming a maximum standard deviation (SD) of 0.35 for log-transformed PK parameters based on previous experience with alirocumab. PK parameters were log-transformed prior to statistical analysis with PKDMS (PKDMS version 2.0 incorporating WinNonlin Professional, version 5.2.1; Pharsight [now Certara, St. Louis, MO, USA]) and SAS® (version 9.2 on Windows platform; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Relative PK of systemic exposure between injection sites was assessed using a linear fixed-effects model with terms for injection site, gender, and weight as covariate. Ratios of geometric means for Cmax, AUClast, and AUC were obtained by computing estimates and 90% CIs for the differences between injection sites means within the linear mixed-effects model framework, then converting to ratios by antilog transformation. Percentage changes from baseline for each PD parameter were compared between each injection site group at each time point using a linear mixed-effects model (SAS Proc Mixed®; SAS Institute) to obtain P-values for the interaction effect between injection site and PD parameter. Safety data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Subjects

In total, 60 subjects were randomized (20 per group), and all completed the study. Baseline characteristics, including mean LDL-C and free PCSK9 levels, were similar across the three groups (Table1).
Table 1

Baseline demographics and subject characteristics

Alirocumab 75 mg SC
Abdomen (n = 20)Upper arm (n = 20)Thigh (n = 20)
Age, years34.4 (7.5)30.7 (5.3)29.7 (6.3)
Male gender, n (%)17 (85%)10 (50%)12 (60%)
Race, n (%)
 Caucasian/white12 (60%)11 (55%)13 (65%)
 Black2 (10%)4 (20%)2 (10%)
 Asian/Oriental5 (25%)4 (20%)5 (25%)
 Other1 (5%)1 (5%)0
BMI < 30 kg/m2, n (%)20 (100%)20 (100%)20 (100%)
LDL-C, mg/dL131.1 (27.5)129.2 (26.7)121.0 (16.6)
HDL-C, mg/dL43.7 (7.3)56.1 (14.7)49.5 (11.6)
Non-HDL-C, mg/dL150.8 (32.1)148.9 (29.4)141.1 (20.1)
Total cholesterol, mg/dL194.5 (32.1)204.9 (33.6)190.6 (18.6)
Triglycerides, mg/dL97.4 (17.7–194.9)88.6 (35.4–230.3)75.3 (26.6–292.3)
Free PCSK9, ng/mL150.0 (52.8)149.4 (53.9)160.2 (57.3)

Values are mean (standard deviation), unless otherwise stated.

BMI, body mass index; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9; SC, subcutaneous.

Baseline demographics and subject characteristics Values are mean (standard deviation), unless otherwise stated. BMI, body mass index; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9; SC, subcutaneous.

Relative Pharmacokinetics

Alirocumab serum concentration–time profiles were similar among the three injection sites, with Cmax of 8.18, 6.77, and 7.13 mg/L and AUC of 129, 130, and 115 mg day/L for the abdomen, upper arm, and thigh groups, respectively (Figure1A). The ratios of point estimates between upper arm versus abdomen injection site groups showed a decrease of 21% for Cmax and 8% for AUC and AUClast (Table2). Comparing thigh versus abdomen, a difference of 12% was observed for Cmax and 16% for AUC and AUClast. For upper arm versus thigh, a 10% difference was observed for Cmax (90% CI: 0.76–1.06), whereas a 9% greater difference was observed for AUC and AUClast.
Figure 1

Mean (SD) alirocumab concentration (A), free PCSK9 levels (B), and percentage change in LDL-C from baseline (C) after subcutaneous administration of alirocumab 75 mg. LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9; SEM, standard error of the mean; SD, standard deviation.

Table 2

Pairwise comparisons of geometric mean ratios of pharmacokinetic parameters between injection site groups

ParameterInjection sites comparedRatios
Point estimate90% CI
CmaxUpper arm versus abdomen0.790.66–0.93
Upper arm versus thigh0.900.76–1.06
Thigh versus abdomen0.880.74–1.04
AUCUpper arm versus abdomen0.920.78–1.09
Upper arm versus thigh1.090.93–1.28
Thigh versus abdomen0.840.72–0.99
AUClastUpper arm versus abdomen0.920.77–1.08
Upper arm versus thigh1.090.93–1.29
Thigh versus abdomen0.840.71–0.99

AUC, area under the serum concentration versus curve from time zero to infinity (AUC); AUClast, area under the serum concentration versus curve from time zero to time of last concentration above lower limit of quantification; Cmax, maximum concentration; CI, confidence interval.

Mean (SD) alirocumab concentration (A), free PCSK9 levels (B), and percentage change in LDL-C from baseline (C) after subcutaneous administration of alirocumab 75 mg. LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9; SEM, standard error of the mean; SD, standard deviation. Pairwise comparisons of geometric mean ratios of pharmacokinetic parameters between injection site groups AUC, area under the serum concentration versus curve from time zero to infinity (AUC); AUClast, area under the serum concentration versus curve from time zero to time of last concentration above lower limit of quantification; Cmax, maximum concentration; CI, confidence interval. Median time to reach Cmax (tmax) was 2.96, 6.95, and 3.06 days in the abdomen, upper arm, and thigh, respectively (Table3). Despite the higher median tmax value for the upper arm, with high variability being observed for the distribution of tmax between the treatment groups, the time–course curves for upper arm and thigh were very similar (Figure1A). Elimination of alirocumab resulted in mean residence time of 11.6–13.5 days and mean half-life of 5.77–6.66 days.
Table 3

Pharmacokinetic parameters of alirocumab following injection of a single 75 mg dose into three different injection sites

Alirocumab 75 mg SC
Abdomen (n = 20)Upper arm (n = 20)Thigh (n = 20)
Cmax, mg/L8.18 (2.51)6.77 (2.02)7.13 (2.21)
tmax, days; median (range)2.96 (1.95–7.01)6.95 (1.96–10.08)3.06 (2.15–8.11)
t1/2z, days6.03 (1.11)6.66 (0.97)5.77 (1.59)
AUC, mg day/L129 (35.7)130 (42.0)115 (44.4)
CL/F, L/day0.63 (0.18)0.63 (0.20)0.78 (0.31)
Vss/F, L7.28 (2.46)8.54 (3.40)8.92 (4.66)
MRT, days11.6 (1.83)13.5 (2.35)11.9 (2.49)

Values are mean (SD), unless otherwise stated.

Cmax, maximum concentration; tmax, time to reaching Cmax; t1/2z, half-life; AUC, area under the serum concentration versus time curve; CL/F, clearance relative to bioavailability; Vss/F, distribution volume at the steady state relative to bioavailability; MRT, mean residence time; SC, subcutaneous.

Pharmacokinetic parameters of alirocumab following injection of a single 75 mg dose into three different injection sites Values are mean (SD), unless otherwise stated. Cmax, maximum concentration; tmax, time to reaching Cmax; t1/2z, half-life; AUC, area under the serum concentration versus time curve; CL/F, clearance relative to bioavailability; Vss/F, distribution volume at the steady state relative to bioavailability; MRT, mean residence time; SC, subcutaneous.

Pharmacodynamics

Maximal reduction of mean free PCSK9 was observed between Day 3 and Day 4 in all groups, with mean values at zero or close to zero (Figure1B). After this suppression, serum concentrations of free PCSK9 started to gradually increase and returned within the baseline range by the end of the study. The PD effects of alirocumab on LDL-C (Figure1C) were similar for all three injection site groups. LDL-C declined reaching a nadir on Day 15 in all groups. At this time point, the percentage decrease in LDL-C was 48.4% in the abdomen group, 39.5% in the upper arm group, and 45.6% in the thigh group (Figure1C). The effect on LDL-C levels was similar across the entire time course at all three injection sites (P-value of the effect of injection site groups = 0.403). There was a trend for a slightly smaller PD effect in the upper arm group observed at nadir values for LDL-C, but not for the overall time course. The PD effects of alirocumab on apoB and non-HDL-C were consistent with LDL-C (Supporting information Figure S1).

Safety

TEAEs were experienced in 8 (40%), 11 (55%), and 13 (65%) subjects in the abdomen, upper arm, and thigh groups, respectively. The most common TEAEs in all groups were nasopharyngitis, which occurred in two (10%), one (5%), and six (30%) subjects, and headache in two (10%), four (20%), and five (25%) subjects in the abdomen, upper arm, and thigh groups, respectively (Table4). Only two local injection site reactions were reported (pain and discoloration); both occurred in the thigh group and were transient and of mild intensity. There were no serious AEs (SAEs) or TEAEs of severe intensity.
Table 4

TEAEs occurring in ≥2 subjects in any group (as defined by primary system organ class [SOC] and MedDRA preferred term [PT], safety population)

SOC  PTAlirocumab 75 mg SC (%)
Abdomen (n = 20)Upper arm (n = 20)Thigh (n = 20)
Any TEAE8 (40)11 (55)13 (65)
Infections and infestations3 (15)4 (20)7 (35)
 Nasopharyngitis2 (10)1 (5)6 (30)
Nervous system disorders3 (15)4 (20)7 (35)
 Headache2 (10)4 (20)5 (25)
Reproductive system and breast disorders1 (5)2 (10)0
 Dysmenorrhea1 (5)2 (10)0
Injury, poisoning, and procedural complications01 (5)3 (15)
 Limb injury002 (10)

An AE is considered as treatment-emergent if it occurred from the time of alirocumab administration up to the EOS visit (inclusive). The two reported injection site AEs were recorded under separate preferred terms (pain and discoloration, respectively), hence do not appear in the table.

TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event; SC, subcutaneous.

TEAEs occurring in ≥2 subjects in any group (as defined by primary system organ class [SOC] and MedDRA preferred term [PT], safety population) An AE is considered as treatment-emergent if it occurred from the time of alirocumab administration up to the EOS visit (inclusive). The two reported injection site AEs were recorded under separate preferred terms (pain and discoloration, respectively), hence do not appear in the table. TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event; SC, subcutaneous.

Discussion

The concentration–time profiles for alirocumab after a single SC injection of 75 mg into the abdomen, upper arm, and thigh were similar in this population of healthy subjects. There was a slight trend for lower exposure in the upper arm and thigh compared with the abdomen. The observed mean half-life of 5.8–6.7 days was consistent with previous estimates of 5.6–8.8 days with single ascending SC doses of alirocumab 6. Subcutaneously administered alirocumab rapidly bound to and reduced circulating free PCSK9, reaching a nadir close to zero between Day 3 and Day 4 in all injection site groups. This was followed by a decrease in LDL-C with maximal reduction on Day 15 in all groups. The dynamics between a single alirocumab 75 mg dose, free PCSK9, and LDL-C observed in this study at each injection site are in agreement with the findings of a single ascending dose study in healthy subjects in which a SC injection of alirocumab into the abdomen resulted in reductions in free PCSK9 levels within 3 days of dosing and peak reductions in LDL-C 8–15 days after dosing 7,8. Additionally, in a Phase 3 monotherapy study, alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks produced sustained LDL-C reductions over 12 weeks of treatment (least square mean reduction of 53.2% from baseline at Week 12) 9,10. During the study, no SAEs or TEAEs of severe intensity were reported, as expected based on the data observed in Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies to date 2,3,10,4. A prefilled pen was used to deliver the single alirocumab 75 mg dose as a 1-mL SC injection. Injection site reactions were infrequent, with only two reports of mild and transient events in the group of subjects receiving the injection in the thigh. Overall, a single administration of alirocumab 75 mg by SC route delivered via prefilled pen into the abdomen, upper arm, or thigh was well tolerated and presented similar PK and PD profiles regardless of injection site. Our findings suggest that alirocumab could be interchangeably injected in the abdomen, upper arm, or thigh offering patients' flexibility in choice of injection site.
  8 in total

1.  Alirocumab for hyperlipidemia: physiology of PCSK9 inhibition, pharmacodynamics and Phase I and II clinical trial results of a PCSK9 monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  Eli M Roth; Philip Diller
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2014-03

2.  Effect of a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9 on LDL cholesterol.

Authors:  Evan A Stein; Scott Mellis; George D Yancopoulos; Neil Stahl; Douglas Logan; William B Smith; Eleanor Lisbon; Maria Gutierrez; Cheryle Webb; Richard Wu; Yunling Du; Therese Kranz; Evelyn Gasparino; Gary D Swergold
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.

Authors:  W T Friedewald; R I Levy; D S Fredrickson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Safety and efficacy of a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 serine protease, SAR236553/REGN727, in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia receiving ongoing stable atorvastatin therapy.

Authors:  James M McKenney; Michael J Koren; Dean J Kereiakes; Corinne Hanotin; Anne-Catherine Ferrand; Evan A Stein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Effect of a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, REGN727/SAR236553, to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia on stable statin dose with or without ezetimibe therapy: a phase 2 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Evan A Stein; Dan Gipe; Jean Bergeron; Daniel Gaudet; Robert Weiss; Robert Dufour; Richard Wu; Robert Pordy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Mutations in PCSK9 cause autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Marianne Abifadel; Mathilde Varret; Jean-Pierre Rabès; Delphine Allard; Khadija Ouguerram; Martine Devillers; Corinne Cruaud; Suzanne Benjannet; Louise Wickham; Danièle Erlich; Aurélie Derré; Ludovic Villéger; Michel Farnier; Isabel Beucler; Eric Bruckert; Jean Chambaz; Bernard Chanu; Jean-Michel Lecerf; Gerald Luc; Philippe Moulin; Jean Weissenbach; Annick Prat; Michel Krempf; Claudine Junien; Nabil G Seidah; Catherine Boileau
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Monotherapy with the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab versus ezetimibe in patients with hypercholesterolemia: results of a 24 week, double-blind, randomized Phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Eli M Roth; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Henry N Ginsberg; John J P Kastelein; Helen M Colhoun; Jennifer G Robinson; Laurence Merlet; Robert Pordy; Marie T Baccara-Dinet
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Atorvastatin with or without an antibody to PCSK9 in primary hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Eli M Roth; James M McKenney; Corinne Hanotin; Gaelle Asset; Evan A Stein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Alirocumab: First Global Approval.

Authors:  Anthony Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Amand F Schmidt; Lucy S Pearce; John T Wilkins; John P Overington; Aroon D Hingorani; Juan P Casas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-28

3.  Target-Mediated Drug Disposition Population Pharmacokinetics Model of Alirocumab in Healthy Volunteers and Patients: Pooled Analysis of Randomized Phase I/II/III Studies.

Authors:  Nassim Djebli; Jean-Marie Martinez; Laura Lohan; Sonia Khier; Aurélie Brunet; Fabrice Hurbin; David Fabre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Cardiovascular Outcomes of PCSK9 Inhibitors: With Special Emphasis on Its Effect beyond LDL-Cholesterol Lowering.

Authors:  Dhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay; Kumar Ashish; Adrija Hajra; Arshna Qureshi; Raktim K Ghosh
Journal:  J Lipids       Date:  2018-03-25

5.  A Phase I Randomized Study of a Specifically Engineered, pH-Sensitive PCSK9 Inhibitor RN317 (PF-05335810) in Hypercholesterolemic Subjects on Statin Therapy.

Authors:  M Levisetti; T Joh; H Wan; H Liang; P Forgues; B Gumbiner; P D Garzone
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.689

6.  Comparative quantitative systems pharmacology modeling of anti-PCSK9 therapeutic modalities in hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Victor Sokolov; Gabriel Helmlinger; Catarina Nilsson; Kirill Zhudenkov; Stanko Skrtic; Bengt Hamrén; Kirill Peskov; Eva Hurt-Camejo; Rasmus Jansson-Löfmark
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 5.922

7.  Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Garetosmab (Anti-Activin A): Results From a First-in-Human Phase 1 Study.

Authors:  Frédéric Vanhoutte; Su Liang; Marcella Ruddy; An Zhao; Tiera Drewery; Yuhuan Wang; Richard DelGizzi; Eduardo Forleo-Neto; Manoj Rajadhyaksha; Gary Herman; John D Davis
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 8.  New developments in atherosclerosis: clinical potential of PCSK9 inhibition.

Authors:  Ilaria Giunzioni; Hagai Tavori
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2015-08-24

9.  PCSK9 inhibitors - from discovery of a single mutation to a groundbreaking therapy of lipid disorders in one decade.

Authors:  Krzysztof Jaworski; Piotr Jankowski; Dariusz A Kosior
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 10.  PCSK9 inhibitors: A new era of lipid lowering therapy.

Authors:  Rahul Chaudhary; Jalaj Garg; Neeraj Shah; Andrew Sumner
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.