Literature DB >> 28304224

Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.

Marc S Sabatine1, Robert P Giugliano1, Anthony C Keech1, Narimon Honarpour1, Stephen D Wiviott1, Sabina A Murphy1, Julia F Kuder1, Huei Wang1, Thomas Liu1, Scott M Wasserman1, Peter S Sever1, Terje R Pedersen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evolocumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and lowers low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by approximately 60%. Whether it prevents cardiovascular events is uncertain.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 27,564 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL cholesterol levels of 70 mg per deciliter (1.8 mmol per liter) or higher who were receiving statin therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive evolocumab (either 140 mg every 2 weeks or 420 mg monthly) or matching placebo as subcutaneous injections. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization. The key secondary efficacy end point was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The median duration of follow-up was 2.2 years.
RESULTS: At 48 weeks, the least-squares mean percentage reduction in LDL cholesterol levels with evolocumab, as compared with placebo, was 59%, from a median baseline value of 92 mg per deciliter (2.4 mmol per liter) to 30 mg per deciliter (0.78 mmol per liter) (P<0.001). Relative to placebo, evolocumab treatment significantly reduced the risk of the primary end point (1344 patients [9.8%] vs. 1563 patients [11.3%]; hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 0.92; P<0.001) and the key secondary end point (816 [5.9%] vs. 1013 [7.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.88; P<0.001). The results were consistent across key subgroups, including the subgroup of patients in the lowest quartile for baseline LDL cholesterol levels (median, 74 mg per deciliter [1.9 mmol per liter]). There was no significant difference between the study groups with regard to adverse events (including new-onset diabetes and neurocognitive events), with the exception of injection-site reactions, which were more common with evolocumab (2.1% vs. 1.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: In our trial, inhibition of PCSK9 with evolocumab on a background of statin therapy lowered LDL cholesterol levels to a median of 30 mg per deciliter (0.78 mmol per liter) and reduced the risk of cardiovascular events. These findings show that patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease benefit from lowering of LDL cholesterol levels below current targets. (Funded by Amgen; FOURIER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01764633 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28304224     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  966 in total

Review 1.  Time to ditch HDL-C as a measure of HDL function?

Authors:  Graziella E Ronsein; Jay W Heinecke
Journal:  Curr Opin Lipidol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.776

Review 2.  Cholesterol Management in the Era of PCSK9 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Anna Svatikova; Stephen L Kopecky
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Prevalence and pharmacologic management of familial hypercholesterolemia in an unselected contemporary cohort of patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Leonardo De Luca; Marcello Arca; Pier L Temporelli; Furio Colivicchi; Lucio Gonzini; Donata Lucci; Biagio Bosco; Mariella Callerame; Giulio V Lettica; Andrea Di Lenarda; Michele M Gulizia
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  Drug development in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Sarah A Dugger; Adam Platt; David B Goldstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  Assessing Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Responses to Preventive Therapies in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Kevin C Maki; Mary R Dicklin
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Mendelian randomization in cardiometabolic disease: challenges in evaluating causality.

Authors:  Michael V Holmes; Mika Ala-Korpela; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Lipid Lowering Therapy for Acute Coronary Syndrome and Coronary Artery Disease: Highlights of the 2017 Taiwan Lipid Guidelines for High Risk Patients.

Authors:  Yi-Heng Li; Ting-Hsing Chao; Ping-Yen Liu; Kwo-Chang Ueng; Hung-I Yeh
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.672

8.  ABCA1 Overexpression in Endothelial Cells In Vitro Enhances ApoAI-Mediated Cholesterol Efflux and Decreases Inflammation.

Authors:  Alexis Stamatikos; Nagadhara Dronadula; Philip Ng; Donna Palmer; Ethan Knight; Bradley K Wacker; Chongren Tang; Francis Kim; David A Dichek
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.695

Review 9.  Optimizing Dyslipidemia Management for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: a Focus on Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Options.

Authors:  Adam N Berman; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Efficacy and Safety of Further Lowering of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients Starting With Very Low Levels: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marc S Sabatine; Stephen D Wiviott; KyungAh Im; Sabina A Murphy; Robert P Giugliano
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 14.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.