Literature DB >> 18707307

Complex mate searching in the satin bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus violaceus.

J A Uy1, G L Patricelli, G Borgia.   

Abstract

Mate-choice studies typically focus on male traits affecting female mating decisions, but few studies seek to identify the behavioral rules females use when searching for mates. Current models suggest that females may either directly compare a set of males ("pooled comparison") or compare each male to an internal standard ("sequential-search rule") when judging the suitability of potential mates. Models also differ in other specific aspects, such as the predicted number of sampling bouts initiated and the tendency of females to return to males after previous visits. We monitored 63 female satin bowerbirds, Ptilonorhynchus violaceus, during mate sampling to reconstruct their search patterns. We found that females typically sampled several males and returned to the most attractive male for mating: a behavior consistent with the pooled-comparison tactic. Females, however, varied in the number of males sampled; some visited only one male before mating. We found that this variation can be explained by differences among females in the number of mates, the date mate searching is initiated, and long-term experience with males. Further, females were observed to initiate two distinct sampling bouts, with the rejection of most of their potential mates occurring before the start of the second sampling bout. This suggests that the choices of potential mates are narrowed prior to the second sampling bout and that the later visits may function to reconsider preliminary decisions made during the first sampling bout or to resolve decisions concerning the remaining potential mates. Our results indicate that mate searching is a complex process in which females use multiple sampling bouts to find suitable mates and in which several different factors influence their search behavior.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 18707307     DOI: 10.1086/323118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  9 in total

1.  Direct benefits of mate choice: a meta-analysis of plumage colour and offspring feeding rates in birds.

Authors:  Gergely Hegyi; Dóra Kötél; Miklós Laczi
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-09-18

2.  Mate choice in the eye and ear of the beholder? Female multimodal sensory configuration influences her preferences.

Authors:  Kelly L Ronald; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The multiple signals assessed by female satin bowerbirds: could they be used to narrow down females' choices of mates?

Authors:  Timothy E Robson; Anne W Goldizen; David J Green
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Visual effects in great bowerbird sexual displays and their implications for signal design.

Authors:  John A Endler; Julie Gaburro; Laura A Kelley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  How collective comparisons emerge without individual comparisons of the options.

Authors:  Elva J H Robinson; Ofer Feinerman; Nigel R Franks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  How do great bowerbirds construct perspective illusions?

Authors:  Laura A Kelley; John A Endler
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Only distance matters - non-choosy females in a poison frog population.

Authors:  Ivonne Meuche; Oscar Brusa; K Eduard Linsenmair; Alexander Keller; Heike Pröhl
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  The relative effectiveness of signaling systems: relying on external items reduces signaling accuracy while leks increase accuracy.

Authors:  Gavin M Leighton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The evolution of phenotypes and genetic parameters under preferential mating.

Authors:  Derek A Roff; Daphne J Fairbairn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.