Literature DB >> 29767754

Midluteal Progesterone: A Marker of Treatment Outcomes in Couples With Unexplained Infertility.

Karl R Hansen1, Esther Eisenberg2, Valerie Baker3, Micah J Hill4, Sixia Chen5, Sara Talken1, Michael P Diamond6, Richard S Legro7, Christos Coutifaris8, Ruben Alvero9, Randal D Robinson10, Peter Casson11, Gregory M Christman12, Nanette Santoro9, Heping Zhang13, Robert A Wild1,5.   

Abstract

Context: Adequate luteal phase progesterone exposure is necessary to induce endometrial changes required for a successful pregnancy outcome. The relationship between low midluteal progesterone concentration and the outcome of live birth in ovarian stimulation with intrauterine insemination (OS-IUI) treatments is not defined. Objective: To determine the level of midluteal progesterone portending a low chance of live birth after OS-IUI in couples with unexplained infertility. Design and Setting: Secondary analyses of data from a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial that determined pregnancy outcomes following OS-IUI with clomiphene citrate, letrozole, or gonadotropins for couples with unexplained infertility. Participants: Couples (n = 900) underwent 2376 OS-IUI cycles during the Assessment of Multiple Intrauterine Gestations from Ovarian Stimulation clinical trial. Main Outcome Measures: Live birth as it relates to midluteal progesterone level and thresholds below which no live births occur by treatment group.
Results: Thresholds for non-live birth cycles were similar for clomiphene (14.4 ng/mL) and letrozole (13.1 ng/mL) yet were lower for gonadotropin (4.3 ng/mL) treatments. A midluteal progesterone level >10th percentile specific for each treatment group independently was associated with greater odds for a live birth in all OS-IUI cycles (adjusted OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.05, 4.48). Conclusions: During OS-IUI, a low midluteal progesterone level was associated with a low probability of live birth. Thresholds differed by medication, with the lowest threshold for gonadotropin. Several pathophysiologic mechanisms may account for low progesterone levels. Refinement of the predictive range associated with particular ovarian stimulation medications during treatment of unexplained infertility may improve accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29767754      PMCID: PMC6276712          DOI: 10.1210/jc.2018-00642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  30 in total

1.  Luteal phase support may improve pregnancy outcomes during intrauterine insemination cycles.

Authors:  Mohamed Ahmed Maher
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Neuroendocrine regulation of the corpus luteum in the human. Evidence for pulsatile progesterone secretion.

Authors:  M Filicori; J P Butler; W F Crowley
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Ovulatory status and follicular response predict success of clomiphene citrate-intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Susanna J Park; Jesus R Alvarez; Gerson Weiss; Stanley Von Hagen; Dayna Smith; Peter G McGovern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Influence of age, diagnosis, and cycle number on pregnancy rates with gonadotropin-induced controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  M Sahakyan; B L Harlow; M D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Predictive value of mid luteal progesterone concentration before luteal support in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Michael F Costello; Sandra Emerson; Julie Lukic; Peter Sjoblom; Don Garrett; Graeme Hughes; Stephen Steigrad
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.100

6.  The value of a single serum progesterone measurement in the midluteal phase as a criterion of a potentially fertile cycle ("ovulation") derived form treated and untreated conception cycles.

Authors:  M G Hull; P E Savage; D R Bromham; A A Ismail; A F Morris
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Efficacy of treatment for unexplained infertility.

Authors:  D S Guzick; M W Sullivan; G D Adamson; M I Cedars; R J Falk; E P Peterson; M P Steinkampf
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Single midluteal progesterone assay in the management of ovulatory infertility.

Authors:  E Radwanska; J Hammond; P Smith
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 0.142

9.  Sequential clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin with intrauterine insemination: the effect of patient age on clinical outcome.

Authors:  P R Brzechffa; S Daneshmand; R P Buyalos
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Luteal phase defect: the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic methods in common clinical use.

Authors:  J Jordan; K Craig; D K Clifton; M R Soules
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Genetics and Epigenetics of Infertility and Treatments on Outcomes.

Authors:  Margareta D Pisarska; Jessica L Chan; Kate Lawrenson; Tania L Gonzalez; Erica T Wang
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 2.  Luteal phase support for women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination or sexual intercourse.

Authors:  Lingling Salang; Danielle M Teixeira; Ivan Solà; Jen Sothornwit; Wellington P Martins; Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-24

3.  Low Luteal Serum Progesterone Levels Are Associated With Lower Ongoing Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates in ART: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Noemie Ranisavljevic; Stephanie Huberlant; Marie Montagut; Pierre-Marie Alonzo; Bernadette Darné; Solène Languille; Tal Anahory; Isabelle Cédrin-Durnerin
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.055

4.  Daily luteal serum and urinary hormone profiles in the menopause transition: Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  Nanette Santoro; Samar R El Khoudary; Alexis Nasr; Ellen B Gold; Gail Greendale; Dan McConnell; Genevieve Neal-Perry; Jelena Pavlovic; Carol Derby; Sybil Crawford
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  The efficacy and safety of luteal phase support with progesterone following ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Casarramona; T Lalmahomed; Chc Lemmen; Mjc Eijkemans; Fjm Broekmans; Aep Cantineau; Kce Drechsel
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 6.055

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.