Literature DB >> 8005304

Luteal phase defect: the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic methods in common clinical use.

J Jordan1, K Craig, D K Clifton, M R Soules.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of common clinical tests used for the diagnosis of luteal phase defect (LPD).
DESIGN: The sensitivity and specificity of these tests for predicting low integrated P levels over the luteal phase were calculated.
SETTING: Outpatient reproductive endocrinology and infertility clinic at a university medical center. PATIENTS: Fifty-eight strictly defined normal women were used to determine normal integrated luteal phase P levels. The study population was a separate 34 women who either were normal (n = 15) or were being evaluated for infertility or recurrent abortion (n = 19). These 34 study subjects all had the following tests performed in the same menstrual cycle: daily reproductive hormone levels, daily assessment of preovulatory follicle size, late luteal endometrial biopsies, and BBT charts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Basal body temperature, maximum preovulatory follicle size, dated endometrial biopsies, and serum P levels (single and multiple) were used in an attempt to predict which patients had low integrated P levels.
RESULTS: Unacceptably low sensitivity and/or specificity levels were found for the following tests: appearance of BBT charts, luteal phase length, and preovulatory follicle diameter. Timed endometrial biopsy was found to have marginally acceptable sensitivity and specificity levels whether dated by next menstrual period or midcycle events. The best test for the prediction of low integrated P was a single serum P level from the midluteal phase that was < 10 ng/mL (31.8 nmol/L) or a sum of three random serum P measurements that was < 30 ng/mL (95.4 nmol/L) (also obtained in the midluteal phase).
CONCLUSIONS: Luteal phase defect is a relatively uncommon but important cause of infertility and/or habitual abortion. The recommended test for the determination of LPD is a midluteal phase single serum P level < 10 ng/mL or the sum of three serum P levels that is < 30 ng/mL. The endometrial biopsy is a second line test that is only recommended when LPD needs to be evaluated in a treated cycle (ovulation induction or supplemental P).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8005304     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56815-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  27 in total

1.  Characterizing physiological and symptomatic variation in menstrual cycles using self-tracked mobile-health data.

Authors:  Kathy Li; Iñigo Urteaga; Chris H Wiggins; Anna Druet; Amanda Shea; Virginia J Vitzthum; Noémie Elhadad
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-05-26

2.  Luteal phase deficiency in regularly menstruating women: prevalence and overlap in identification based on clinical and biochemical diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Karen C Schliep; Sunni L Mumford; Ahmad O Hammoud; Joseph B Stanford; Kerri A Kissell; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Neil J Perkins; Katherine A Ahrens; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Pauline Mendola; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Progesterone and the luteal phase: a requisite to reproduction.

Authors:  Tolga B Mesen; Steven L Young
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Do serum progesterone levels on day of embryo transfer influence pregnancy outcomes in artificial frozen-thaw cycles?

Authors:  Michelle Volovsky; Cassandra Pakes; Genia Rozen; Alex Polyakov
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Dietary factors and luteal phase deficiency in healthy eumenorrheic women.

Authors:  Mary A Andrews; Karen C Schliep; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Joseph B Stanford; Shvetha M Zarek; Rose G Radin; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Neil J Perkins; Robyn A Kalwerisky; Ahmad O Hammoud; Sunni L Mumford
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Physiopathological aspects of corpus luteum defect in infertile patients with mild/minimal endometriosis.

Authors:  João Sabino Cunha-Filho; Jorge Luiz Gross; Carlos Aogusto Bastos de Souza; Nadiane Albuquerque Lemos; Camila Giugliani; Fernando Freitas; Eduardo Pandolfi Passos
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Apoptosis is increased and cell proliferation is decreased in out-of-phase endometria from infertile and recurrent abortion patients.

Authors:  Gabriela F Meresman; Carla Olivares; Susana Vighi; Margarita Alfie; Marcela Irigoyen; Juan J Etchepareborda
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Midluteal Progesterone: A Marker of Treatment Outcomes in Couples With Unexplained Infertility.

Authors:  Karl R Hansen; Esther Eisenberg; Valerie Baker; Micah J Hill; Sixia Chen; Sara Talken; Michael P Diamond; Richard S Legro; Christos Coutifaris; Ruben Alvero; Randal D Robinson; Peter Casson; Gregory M Christman; Nanette Santoro; Heping Zhang; Robert A Wild
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Endometrial development and function in experimentally induced luteal phase deficiency.

Authors:  Rebecca S Usadi; Jeremy M Groll; Bruce A Lessey; Ruth A Lininger; Richard J Zaino; Marc A Fritz; Steven L Young
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Preparation of the Endometrium for Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sezcan Mumusoglu; Mehtap Polat; Irem Yarali Ozbek; Gurkan Bozdag; Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan; Hakan Yarali
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.