| Literature DB >> 29767009 |
Yang Ding1, Xingchen Bu1, Nannan Zhang1, Lanlan Li1, Xiaoting Zou1.
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary ME and CP levels on laying performance, egg quality and serum biochemical indices of Fengda-1 layers. In a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement, 2,400 Fengda-1 layers (32 wk of age) were randomly assigned to 6 experimental diets with 2,650 and 2,750 kcal of ME/kg of diet, each containing 14.50%, 15.00% and 15.50% CP, respectively. Each dietary treatment was replicated 5 times, and feed and water were provided ad libitum. The trial lasted for 10 wk, including a 2-week acclimation period and an 8-week experimental period. Our results showed that ADFI decreased as the ME level of diet increased from 2,650 to 2,750 kcal/kg (P < 0.05). Layers fed diets with 2,750 kcal/kg ME exhibited higher mortality than those fed with 2,650 kcal/kg ME (P < 0.05). Birds fed with 14.50% and 15.00% CP had higher egg production (EP) and egg mass (EM) than those fed with 15.50% CP (P < 0.05). Yolk color increased as the ME level of the diet increased from 2,650 to 2,750 kcal/kg, however, the eggshell thickness decreased (P < 0.05). Serum concentrations of uric acid and triglyceride in layers fed diets with 2,750 kcal/kg ME were higher than those fed diets with 2,650 kcal/kg ME (P < 0.05). There was no significant interaction between ME and CP on laying performance, egg quality, or serum biochemical indices (P > 0.05). Based on the data under the experimental conditions, the optimal dietary ME and CP levels of Fengda-1 layers are 2,650 kcal/kg and 15.00% (33 to 41 wk of age).Entities:
Keywords: Egg quality; Energy; Fengda-1 layers; Laying performance; Protein
Year: 2016 PMID: 29767009 PMCID: PMC5941022 DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2016.03.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Nutr ISSN: 2405-6383
Ingredients and nutrient composition of the experimental diet (as fed basis).
| Item | ME, kcal/kg/CP, % | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,650/14.50 | 2,650/15.00 | 2,650/15.50 | 2,750/14.50 | 2,750/15.00 | 2,750/15.50 | |
| Ingredient, % | ||||||
| Corn | 62.52 | 62.52 | 62.45 | 66.50 | 64.75 | 63.35 |
| Soybean meal | 18.90 | 21.10 | 22.70 | 20.10 | 21.92 | 23.35 |
| Wheat bran | 6.70 | 5.20 | 3.75 | 1.15 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| Limestone | 9.40 | 8.93 | 9.20 | 9.40 | 9.40 | 9.40 |
| Soybean oil | 0.99 | 0.74 | 0.54 | 1.30 | 1.50 | 1.70 |
| CaHPO4 | 0.55 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.66 |
| NaCl | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Trace elements premix | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Vitamin premix | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| DL-Met | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| L-Lys·HCl | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.10 |
| L-Thr | 0.04 | 0.01 | – | 0.03 | – | – |
| Nutrient level, % | ||||||
| ME, kcal/kg | 2,650 (2,645) | 2,650 (2,652) | 2,650 (2,642) | 2,750 (2,751) | 2,750 (2,755) | 2,750 (2,760) |
| CP | 14.50 (14.52) | 15.00 (15.13) | 15.50 (15.59) | 14.50 (14.47) | 15.00 (15.10) | 15.51 (15.58) |
| Calcium | 3.50 | 3.40 | 3.44 | 3.51 | 3.51 | 3.53 |
| Total P | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.43 |
| Linoleic acid | 1.58 | 1.56 | 1.55 | 1.58 | 1.55 | 1.52 |
| Methionine | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Lysine | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.85 |
| Threonine | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.58 |
| Tryptophan | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
The trace elements premix provided the following per kg of diet: Fe, 80 mg; Zn, 120 mg; Cu, 10 mg; Mn, 60 mg; I, 1 mg; Se, 0.4 mg; Co, 0.2 mg.
The vitamin premix provided the following per kg of diet: vitamin A, 12,000 IU; vitamin D3, 3,750 IU; vitamin E, 30 mg; vitamin K3, 2.4 mg; vitamin B1, 1.8 mg; vitamin B2, 7.5 mg; vitamin B6, 4.5 mg; vitamin B12, 0.02 mg; biotin, 0.15 mg; D-Pantothenic acid, 15 mg; folic acid, 1.35 mg; niacin, 48 mg; antioxidant, 0.15 mg.
Nutrient levels were calculated from data provided by Feed Database in China (2013).
Value in parentheses was the analyzed value.
Effect of dietary ME and CP levels on laying performance of Fengda-1 layers.
| Item | EP, % | ADFI, g/d | EW, g | FCR, g/g | EM, g/d | BER, % | Mortality, % | ADG, g/d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ME, kcal/kg | CP, % | ||||||||
| 2,650 | 14.50 | 81.13 ± 0.93a | 100.13 ± 0.99a | 52.11 ± 0.14 | 2.37 ± 0.04 | 42.49 ± 0.65ab | 0.13 ± 0.05 | 0.90 ± 0.38ab | 0.75 ± 0.31 |
| 2,650 | 15.00 | 82.25 ± 1.15a | 96.82 ± 4.90ab | 52.27 ± 0.27 | 2.25 ± 1.20 | 42.99 ± 0.42a | 0.11 ± 0.06 | 0.50 ± 0.47b | 0.72 ± 0.46 |
| 2,650 | 15.50 | 80.07 ± 1.04b | 98.01 ± 4.40a | 52.14 ± 0.22 | 2.35 ± 0.09 | 41.75 ± 0.60ab | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.70 ± 0.41ab | 0.99 ± 0.55 |
| 2,750 | 14.50 | 82.50 ± 1.50a | 95.86 ± 3.78ab | 51.87 ± 0.39 | 2.24 ± 0.10 | 42.79 ± 1.05ab | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 1.10 ± 0.38ab | 0.85 ± 0.49 |
| 2,750 | 15.00 | 80.42 ± 1.48b | 97.20 ± 5.29a | 52.36 ± 0.28 | 2.31 ± 0.09 | 42.11 ± 0.88ab | 0.15 ± 0.04 | 0.85 ± 0.49ab | 0.83 ± 0.55 |
| 2,750 | 15.50 | 79.34 ± 1.63b | 91.71 ± 0.79b | 51.97 ± 0.43 | 2.23 ± 0.07 | 41.66 ± 1.27b | 0.13 ± 0.06 | 1.15 ± 0.43a | 0.88 ± 0.54 |
| ME, kcal/kg | |||||||||
| 2,650 | 81.15 ± 1.34 | 98.32 ± 3.83a | 52.17 ± 0.21 | 2.32 ± 0.10 | 42.41 ± 0.74 | 0.13 ± 0.05 | 0.70 ± 0.42b | 0.82 ± 0.47 | |
| 2,750 | 80.53 ± 1.83 | 94.93 ± 4.25b | 52.06 ± 0.41 | 2.26 ± 0.09 | 42.19 ± 1.11 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 1.03 ± 0.42a | 0.85 ± 0.48 | |
| CP, % | |||||||||
| 14.50 | 81.58 ± 1.24a | 98.00 ± 3.44 | 51.99 ± 0.30 | 2.31 ± 0.10 | 42.64 ± 0.84a | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 1.00 ± 0.37 | 0.80 ± 0.39 | |
| 15.00 | 81.34 ± 1.58a | 97.01 ± 4.81 | 52.31 ± 0.27 | 2.28 ± 0.11 | 42.55 ± 0.80a | 0.13 ± 0.06 | 0.68 ± 0.49 | 0.78 ± 0.48 | |
| 15.50 | 79.70 ± 1.34b | 94.86 ± 4.46 | 52.05 ± 0.33 | 2.29 ± 0.10 | 41.70 ± 0.94b | 0.14 ± 0.05 | 0.93 ± 0.46 | 0.94 ± 0.54 | |
| ANOVA ( | |||||||||
| ME | 0.300 | 0.022 | 0.343 | 0.060 | 0.484 | 0.650 | 0.042 | 0.788 | |
| CP | 0.007 | 0.192 | 0.057 | 0.816 | 0.042 | 0.895 | 0.223 | 0.492 | |
| ME × CP | 0.079 | 0.156 | 0.441 | 0.056 | 0.313 | 0.279 | 0.805 | 0.610 | |
EP = egg production; EW = egg weight; EM = egg mass; BER = broken egg rate.
a,bWithin the same column, values with no or same superscripts differ not significantly (P > 0.05), whereas values with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05).
Effect of dietary ME and CP levels on egg quality of Fengda-1 layers.
| Item | Albumin height, mm | Yolk color | Haugh unit | Eggshell strength, kg/cm3 | Eggshell thickness, mm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ME, kcal/kg | CP, % | |||||
| 2,650 | 14.50 | 5.40 ± 0.85 | 11.35 ± 0.14b | 75.45 ± 5.84 | 4.52 ± 0.36 | 0.36 ± 0.01a |
| 2,650 | 15.00 | 5.12 ± 0.16 | 11.30 ± 0.45b | 72.17 ± 2.13 | 4.19 ± 0.31 | 0.37 ± 0.02a |
| 2,650 | 15.50 | 5.07 ± 0.71 | 11.25 ± 0.61b | 73.03 ± 4.62 | 4.47 ± 0.45 | 0.37 ± 0.01a |
| 2,750 | 14.50 | 4.98 ± 0.53 | 11.40 ± 0.33b | 70.57 ± 4.07 | 4.43 ± 0.17 | 0.36 ± 0.01a |
| 2,750 | 15.00 | 5.25 ± 0.61 | 12.11 ± 0.19a | 72.99 ± 4.92 | 4.22 ± 0.51 | 0.34 ± 0.01b |
| 2,750 | 15.50 | 5.40 ± 0.42 | 11.35 ± 0.28b | 73.80 ± 2.82 | 4.40 ± 0.39 | 0.36 ± 0.01ab |
| ME, kcal/kg | ||||||
| 2,650 | 5.20 ± 0.62 | 11.30 ± 0.39b | 73.44 ± 4.18 | 4.39 ± 0.38 | 0.37 ± 0.01a | |
| 2,750 | 5.21 ± 0.52 | 11.54 ± 0.42a | 72.46 ± 3.99 | 4.35 ± 0.37 | 0.35 ± 0.01b | |
| CP, % | ||||||
| 14.50 | 5.19 ± 0.70 | 11.27 ± 0.27 | 72.74 ± 5.26 | 4.48 ± 0.27 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | |
| 15.00 | 5.18 ± 0.42 | 11.70 ± 0.59 | 72.58 ± 3.60 | 4.21 ± 0.40 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | |
| 15.50 | 5.24 ± 0.58 | 11.27 ± 0.48 | 73.46 ± 3.48 | 4.43 ± 0.40 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | |
| ANOVA ( | ||||||
| ME | 0.963 | 0.038 | 0.495 | 0.764 | 0.018 | |
| CP | 0.977 | 0.087 | 0.910 | 0.259 | 0.286 | |
| ME × CP | 0.353 | 0.090 | 0.266 | 0.928 | 0.218 | |
a,bWithin the same column, values with no or same superscripts differ not significantly (P > 0.05), whereas values with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05).
Effect of dietary ME and CP levels on serum concentrations of TP, albumin, uric acid, triglyceride and T-CHO of Fengda-1 layers.
| Item | TP, g/L | ALB, g/L | UA, mg/L | TG, mmol/L | T-CHO, mmol/L | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ME, kcal/kg | CP, % | |||||
| 2,650 | 14.50 | 43.73 ± 3.67 | 29.14 ± 1.89 | 38.49 ± 9.26b | 3.69 ± 0.42ab | 2.54 ± 0.31 |
| 2,650 | 15.00 | 46.68 ± 6.24 | 29.87 ± 0.56 | 43.37 ± 8.32ab | 3.58 ± 0.26b | 2.69 ± 0.62 |
| 2,650 | 15.50 | 46.32 ± 4.40 | 30.77 ± 1.72 | 41.38 ± 8.26b | 3.72 ± 0.19ab | 2.82 ± 0.43 |
| 2,750 | 14.50 | 41.53 ± 6.12 | 29.79 ± 1.32 | 46.56 ± 4.62ab | 3.97 ± 0.47ab | 2.89 ± 0.20 |
| 2,750 | 15.00 | 43.59 ± 4.68 | 30.12 ± 1.45 | 47.35 ± 3.98ab | 4.08 ± 0.26a | 2.67 ± 0.29 |
| 2,750 | 15.50 | 43.82 ± 4.03 | 30.37 ± 1.34 | 49.43 ± 3.19a | 3.86 ± 0.21ab | 2.86 ± 0.13 |
| ME, kcal/kg | ||||||
| 2,650 | 45.58 ± 4.20 | 29.90 ± 1.68 | 41.08 ± 8.18b | 3.66 ± 0.27b | 2.68 ± 0.45 | |
| 2,750 | 42.98 ± 4.64 | 30.38 ± 1.41 | 47.78 ± 3.05a | 3.97 ± 0.30a | 2.81 ± 0.23 | |
| CP, % | ||||||
| 14.50 | 42.63 ± 5.02 | 29.44 ± 1.92 | 42.53 ± 8.90 | 3.83 ± 0.45 | 2.72 ± 0.29 | |
| 15.00 | 45.13 ± 5.24 | 30.47 ± 1.30 | 45.36 ± 7.33 | 3.83 ± 0.23 | 2.68 ± 0.33 | |
| 15.50 | 45.07 ± 4.89 | 30.56 ± 1.49 | 45.41 ± 6.82 | 3.79 ± 0.20 | 2.84 ± 0.42 | |
| ANOVA ( | ||||||
| ME | 0.076 | 0.391 | 0.032 | 0.017 | 0.372 | |
| CP | 0.328 | 0.172 | 0.415 | 0.169 | 0.358 | |
| ME × CP | 0.403 | 0.513 | 0.613 | 0.732 | 0.473 | |
TP = total protein; ALB = albumin; UA = uric acid; TG = triglyceride; T-CHO = total cholesterol.
a,bWithin the same column, values with no or same superscripts differ not significantly (P > 0.05), whereas values with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05).