Literature DB >> 2976438

Perceptual categorization and consistency of synthesized (r-w) continua by adults, normal children and (r)-misarticulating children.

R N Ohde1, D J Sharf.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if children who misarticulate (r) differ from normal children and adults in the perception of sound features that are produced correctly and incorrectly. Children with normal articulation, children who produced (r) misarticulations, and adults listened to synthesized child and adult (r-w) continua in two separate sessions, and to an adult (b-w) control continuum in one session. Perception was evaluated on the basis of measures of phonetic boundary location and the consistency of response to each stimulus in a continuum. The (r)-misarticulating children were found to be significantly less consistent than child and adult controls in responding to the (r-w) stimuli. Moreover, consistency scores were significantly higher for the adult continuum than for the child continuum. The performance of children was different from that of adults. Due to inconsistent performance, boundaries could not be computed for (r)-misarticulating children, but it was found that the boundaries for children in the control group were closer to the (r)-end of the continuum than those for adults. In the case of the (b-w) continuum, it was found that (r)-misarticulating children were significantly less consistent than adults. The phonetic boundaries of children were significantly closer to the (b)-end of the continuum than the boundary for adults. Thus, the results reveal that variability in stimulus response was influenced primarily by the productive ability of the subjects, whereas differences in stimulus categorization were influenced by the age of the subjects. The perceptual variability was most clearly reflected by responses to stimuli produced incorrectly, whereas categorization differences extended to sounds produced correctly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2976438     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3104.556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  8 in total

1.  Modelling category goodness judgments in children with residual sound errors.

Authors:  Sarah Hamilton Dugan; Noah Silbert; Tara McAllister; Jonathan L Preston; Carolyn Sotto; Suzanne E Boyce
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Formant onsets and formant transitions as developmental cues to vowel perception.

Authors:  Ralph N Ohde; Sarah R German
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sensitivity to structure in the speech signal by children with speech sound disorder and reading disability.

Authors:  Erin Phinney Johnson; Bruce F Pennington; Joanna H Lowenstein; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  Auditory Perception and Ultrasound Biofeedback Treatment Outcomes for Children With Residual /ɹ/ Distortions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Elaine R Hitchcock; Megan C Leece
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Perception of Speech Sounds in School-Aged Children with Speech Sound Disorders.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Julia R Irwin; Jacqueline Turcios
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 1.761

6.  Auditory-perceptual acuity in rhotic misarticulation: baseline characteristics and treatment response.

Authors:  Laine Cialdella; Heather Kabakoff; Jonathan Preston; Sarah Dugan; Caroline Spencer; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; D Whalen; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 1.346

7.  Intensive Treatment for Persisting Rhotic Distortions: A Case Series.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Megan C Leece
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Comparing Biofeedback Types for Children With Residual /ɹ/ Errors in American English: A Single-Case Randomization Design.

Authors:  Nina R Benway; Elaine R Hitchcock; Tara McAllister; Graham Tomkins Feeny; Jennifer Hill; Jonathan L Preston
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.408

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.