Alba Torres1, Mohammed Alshalalfa2, Elai Davicioni2, Anuj Gupta3, Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian3, Sarah J Wheelan3,4, Jonathan I Epstein1,3,5, Angelo M De Marzo1,3,5, Tamara L Lotan1,3. 1. Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. GenomeDx Biosciences, Vancouver, British Columbia. 3. Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 5. Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rare prostate carcinomas aberrantly express p63 and have an immunophenotype intermediate between basal and luminal cells. Here, we performed gene expression profiling on p63-expressing prostatic carcinomas and compared them to usual-type adenocarcinoma. We identify ETS2 as highly expressed in p63-expressing prostatic carcinomas and benign prostate basal cells, with lower expression in luminal cells and primary usual-type adenocarcinomas. METHODS: A total of 8 p63-expressing prostate carcinomas at radical prostatectomy were compared to 358 usual-type adenocarcinomas by gene expression profiling performed on formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue using Affymetrix 1.0 ST microarrays. Correlation between differentially expressed genes and TP63 expression was performed in 5239 prostate adenocarcinomas available in the Decipher GRID. For validation, ETS2 in situ hybridization was performed on 19 p63-expressing prostate carcinomas and 30 usual-type adenocarcinomas arrayed on tissue microarrays (TMA). RESULTS: By gene expression, p63-expressing prostate carcinomas showed low cell cycle activity and low Decipher prognostic scores, but were predicted to have high Gleason grade compared to usual-type adenocarcinomas by gene expression signatures and morphology. Among the genes over-expressed in p63-expressing carcinoma relative to usual-type adenocarcinoma were known p63-regulated genes, along with ETS2, an ETS family member previously implicated as a prostate cancer tumor suppressor gene. Across several cohorts of prostate samples, ETS2 gene expression was correlated with TP63 expression and was significantly higher in benign prostate compared to usual-type adenocarcinoma. By in situ hybridization, ETS2 gene expression was high in benign basal cells, and low to undetectable in benign luminal cells or usual-type adenocarcinoma. In contrast, ETS2 was highly expressed in 95% (18/19) of p63-expressing prostate carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: ETS2 is a predominantly basally-expressed gene in the prostate, with low expression in usual-type adenocarcinoma and high expression in p63-expressing carcinomas. Given this pattern, the significance of ETS2 loss by deletion or mutation in usual-type adenocarcinomas is uncertain.
BACKGROUND: Rare prostate carcinomas aberrantly express p63 and have an immunophenotype intermediate between basal and luminal cells. Here, we performed gene expression profiling on p63-expressing prostatic carcinomas and compared them to usual-type adenocarcinoma. We identify ETS2 as highly expressed in p63-expressing prostatic carcinomas and benign prostate basal cells, with lower expression in luminal cells and primary usual-type adenocarcinomas. METHODS: A total of 8 p63-expressing prostate carcinomas at radical prostatectomy were compared to 358 usual-type adenocarcinomas by gene expression profiling performed on formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue using Affymetrix 1.0 ST microarrays. Correlation between differentially expressed genes and TP63 expression was performed in 5239 prostate adenocarcinomas available in the Decipher GRID. For validation, ETS2 in situ hybridization was performed on 19 p63-expressing prostate carcinomas and 30 usual-type adenocarcinomas arrayed on tissue microarrays (TMA). RESULTS: By gene expression, p63-expressing prostate carcinomas showed low cell cycle activity and low Decipher prognostic scores, but were predicted to have high Gleason grade compared to usual-type adenocarcinomas by gene expression signatures and morphology. Among the genes over-expressed in p63-expressing carcinoma relative to usual-type adenocarcinoma were known p63-regulated genes, along with ETS2, an ETS family member previously implicated as a prostate cancer tumor suppressor gene. Across several cohorts of prostate samples, ETS2 gene expression was correlated with TP63 expression and was significantly higher in benign prostate compared to usual-type adenocarcinoma. By in situ hybridization, ETS2 gene expression was high in benign basal cells, and low to undetectable in benign luminal cells or usual-type adenocarcinoma. In contrast, ETS2 was highly expressed in 95% (18/19) of p63-expressing prostate carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS:ETS2 is a predominantly basally-expressed gene in the prostate, with low expression in usual-type adenocarcinoma and high expression in p63-expressing carcinomas. Given this pattern, the significance of ETS2 loss by deletion or mutation in usual-type adenocarcinomas is uncertain.
Authors: Jack Cuzick; Gregory P Swanson; Gabrielle Fisher; Arthur R Brothman; Daniel M Berney; Julia E Reid; David Mesher; V O Speights; Elzbieta Stankiewicz; Christopher S Foster; Henrik Møller; Peter Scardino; Jorja D Warren; Jimmy Park; Adib Younus; Darl D Flake; Susanne Wagner; Alexander Gutin; Jerry S Lanchbury; Steven Stone Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Liana B Guedes; Fawaz Almutairi; Michael C Haffner; Gaurav Rajoria; Zach Liu; Szczepan Klimek; Roberto Zoino; Kasra Yousefi; Rajni Sharma; Angelo M De Marzo; George J Netto; William B Isaacs; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer; Tamara L Lotan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Mai N Tran; Woonyoung Choi; Matthew F Wszolek; Neema Navai; I-Ling C Lee; Giovanni Nitti; Sijin Wen; Elsa R Flores; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Bogdan Czerniak; Colin Dinney; Michelle Barton; David J McConkey Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Michael H Johnson; Ashley E Ross; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Nicholas Erho; Kasra Yousefi; Stephanie Glavaris; Helen Fedor; Misop Han; Sheila F Faraj; Stephania M Bezerra; George Netto; Alan W Partin; Bruce J Trock; Elai Davicioni; Edward M Schaeffer Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Kathryn L Penney; Jennifer A Sinnott; Katja Fall; Yudi Pawitan; Yujin Hoshida; Peter Kraft; Jennifer R Stark; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Sven Perner; Stephen Finn; Stefano Calza; Richard Flavin; Matthew L Freedman; Sunita Setlur; Howard D Sesso; Swen-Olof Andersson; Neil Martin; Philip W Kantoff; Jan-Erik Johansson; Hans-Olov Adami; Mark A Rubin; Massimo Loda; Todd R Golub; Ove Andrén; Meir J Stampfer; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Scott A Tomlins; Rohit Mehra; Daniel R Rhodes; Lisa R Smith; Diane Roulston; Beth E Helgeson; Xuhong Cao; John T Wei; Mark A Rubin; Rajal B Shah; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Javier A Baena-Del Valle; Qizhi Zheng; David M Esopi; Michael Rubenstein; Gretchen K Hubbard; Maria C Moncaliano; Andrew Hruszkewycz; Ajay Vaghasia; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Sarah J Wheelan; Alan K Meeker; Christopher M Heaphy; Mindy K Graham; Angelo M De Marzo Journal: J Pathol Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Xi Wang; Marianna Kruithof-de Julio; Kyriakos D Economides; David Walker; Hailong Yu; M Vivienne Halili; Ya-Ping Hu; Sandy M Price; Cory Abate-Shen; Michael M Shen Journal: Nature Date: 2009-09-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Igor Vidal; Qizhi Zheng; Jessica L Hicks; Jiayu Chen; Elizabeth A Platz; Bruce J Trock; Ibrahim Kulac; Javier A Baena-Del Valle; Karen S Sfanos; Sarah Ernst; Tracy Jones; Janielle P Maynard; Stephanie A Glavaris; William G Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Angelo M De Marzo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 3.240