PURPOSE: Prostate-specific antigen screening has led to enormous overtreatment of prostate cancer because of the inability to distinguish potentially lethal disease at diagnosis. We reasoned that by identifying an mRNA signature of Gleason grade, the best predictor of prognosis, we could improve prediction of lethal disease among men with moderate Gleason 7 tumors, the most common grade, and the most indeterminate in terms of prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the complementary DNA-mediated annealing, selection, extension, and ligation assay, we measured the mRNA expression of 6,100 genes in prostate tumor tissue in the Swedish Watchful Waiting cohort (n = 358) and Physicians' Health Study (PHS; n = 109). We developed an mRNA signature of Gleason grade comparing individuals with Gleason ≤ 6 to those with Gleason ≥ 8 tumors and applied the model among patients with Gleason 7 to discriminate lethal cases. RESULTS: We built a 157-gene signature using the Swedish data that predicted Gleason with low misclassification (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.91); when this signature was tested in the PHS, the discriminatory ability remained high (AUC = 0.94). In men with Gleason 7 tumors, who were excluded from the model building, the signature significantly improved the prediction of lethal disease beyond knowing whether the Gleason score was 4 + 3 or 3 + 4 (P = .006). CONCLUSION: Our expression signature and the genes identified may improve our understanding of the de-differentiation process of prostate tumors. Additionally, the signature may have clinical applications among men with Gleason 7, by further estimating their risk of lethal prostate cancer and thereby guiding therapy decisions to improve outcomes and reduce overtreatment.
PURPOSE:Prostate-specific antigen screening has led to enormous overtreatment of prostate cancer because of the inability to distinguish potentially lethal disease at diagnosis. We reasoned that by identifying an mRNA signature of Gleason grade, the best predictor of prognosis, we could improve prediction of lethal disease among men with moderate Gleason 7 tumors, the most common grade, and the most indeterminate in terms of prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the complementary DNA-mediated annealing, selection, extension, and ligation assay, we measured the mRNA expression of 6,100 genes in prostate tumor tissue in the Swedish Watchful Waiting cohort (n = 358) and Physicians' Health Study (PHS; n = 109). We developed an mRNA signature of Gleason grade comparing individuals with Gleason ≤ 6 to those with Gleason ≥ 8 tumors and applied the model among patients with Gleason 7 to discriminate lethal cases. RESULTS: We built a 157-gene signature using the Swedish data that predicted Gleason with low misclassification (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.91); when this signature was tested in the PHS, the discriminatory ability remained high (AUC = 0.94). In men with Gleason 7 tumors, who were excluded from the model building, the signature significantly improved the prediction of lethal disease beyond knowing whether the Gleason score was 4 + 3 or 3 + 4 (P = .006). CONCLUSION: Our expression signature and the genes identified may improve our understanding of the de-differentiation process of prostate tumors. Additionally, the signature may have clinical applications among men with Gleason 7, by further estimating their risk of lethal prostate cancer and thereby guiding therapy decisions to improve outcomes and reduce overtreatment.
Authors: Scott A Tomlins; Rohit Mehra; Daniel R Rhodes; Xuhong Cao; Lei Wang; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; John T Wei; Mark A Rubin; Kenneth J Pienta; Rajal B Shah; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2006-12-17 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Lawrence True; Ilsa Coleman; Sarah Hawley; Ching-Ying Huang; David Gifford; Roger Coleman; Tomasz M Beer; Edward Gelmann; Milton Datta; Elahe Mostaghel; Beatrice Knudsen; Paul Lange; Robert Vessella; Daniel Lin; Leroy Hood; Peter S Nelson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-07-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yujin Hoshida; Augusto Villanueva; Masahiro Kobayashi; Judit Peix; Derek Y Chiang; Amy Camargo; Supriya Gupta; Jamie Moore; Matthew J Wrobel; Jim Lerner; Michael Reich; Jennifer A Chan; Jonathan N Glickman; Kenji Ikeda; Masaji Hashimoto; Goro Watanabe; Maria G Daidone; Sasan Roayaie; Myron Schwartz; Swan Thung; Helga B Salvesen; Stacey Gabriel; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Jordi Bruix; Scott L Friedman; Hiromitsu Kumada; Josep M Llovet; Todd R Golub Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John C Cheville; R Jeffrey Karnes; Terry M Therneau; Farhad Kosari; Jan-Marie Munz; Lori Tillmans; Eati Basal; Laureano J Rangel; Eric Bergstralh; Irina V Kovtun; C D Savci-Heijink; Eric W Klee; George Vasmatzis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sunita R Setlur; Kirsten D Mertz; Yujin Hoshida; Francesca Demichelis; Mathieu Lupien; Sven Perner; Andrea Sboner; Yudi Pawitan; Ove Andrén; Laura A Johnson; Jeff Tang; Hans-Olov Adami; Stefano Calza; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Daniel Rhodes; Scott Tomlins; Katja Fall; Lorelei A Mucci; Philip W Kantoff; Meir J Stampfer; Swen-Olof Andersson; Eberhard Varenhorst; Jan-Erik Johansson; Myles Brown; Todd R Golub; Mark A Rubin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Prakash Kulkarni; Takumi Shiraishi; Krithika Rajagopalan; Robert Kim; Steven M Mooney; Robert H Getzenberg Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Jennifer A Sinnott; Jennifer R Rider; Jessica Carlsson; Travis Gerke; Svitlana Tyekucheva; Kathryn L Penney; Howard D Sesso; Massimo Loda; Katja Fall; Meir J Stampfer; Lorelei A Mucci; Yudi Pawitan; Sven-Olof Andersson; Ove Andrén Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Svitlana Tyekucheva; Neil E Martin; Edward C Stack; Wei Wei; Vinod Vathipadiekal; Levi Waldron; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Rosina T Lis; Meir J Stampfer; Massimo Loda; Giovanni Parmigiani; Lorelei A Mucci; Michael Birrer Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Paul C Boutros; Michael Fraser; Nicholas J Harding; Richard de Borja; Dominique Trudel; Emilie Lalonde; Alice Meng; Pablo H Hennings-Yeomans; Andrew McPherson; Veronica Y Sabelnykova; Amin Zia; Natalie S Fox; Julie Livingstone; Yu-Jia Shiah; Jianxin Wang; Timothy A Beck; Cherry L Have; Taryne Chong; Michelle Sam; Jeremy Johns; Lee Timms; Nicholas Buchner; Ada Wong; John D Watson; Trent T Simmons; Christine P'ng; Gaetano Zafarana; Francis Nguyen; Xuemei Luo; Kenneth C Chu; Stephenie D Prokopec; Jenna Sykes; Alan Dal Pra; Alejandro Berlin; Andrew Brown; Michelle A Chan-Seng-Yue; Fouad Yousif; Robert E Denroche; Lauren C Chong; Gregory M Chen; Esther Jung; Clement Fung; Maud H W Starmans; Hanbo Chen; Shaylan K Govind; James Hawley; Alister D'Costa; Melania Pintilie; Daryl Waggott; Faraz Hach; Philippe Lambin; Lakshmi B Muthuswamy; Colin Cooper; Rosalind Eeles; David Neal; Bernard Tetu; Cenk Sahinalp; Lincoln D Stein; Neil Fleshner; Sohrab P Shah; Colin C Collins; Thomas J Hudson; John D McPherson; Theodorus van der Kwast; Robert G Bristow Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2015-05-25 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Michael J Triolo; Jonathan Melamed; Henry Rusinek; Samir S Taneja; Fang-Ming Deng Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jennifer A Sinnott; Sam F Peisch; Svitlana Tyekucheva; Travis Gerke; Rosina Lis; Jennifer R Rider; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Meir J Stampfer; Lorelei A Mucci; Massimo Loda; Kathryn L Penney Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Alba Torres; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Elai Davicioni; Anuj Gupta; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Sarah J Wheelan; Jonathan I Epstein; Angelo M De Marzo; Tamara L Lotan Journal: Prostate Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 4.104