Literature DB >> 28446506

Analytic, Preanalytic, and Clinical Validation of p53 IHC for Detection of TP53 Missense Mutation in Prostate Cancer.

Liana B Guedes1, Fawaz Almutairi1, Michael C Haffner1, Gaurav Rajoria2, Zach Liu2, Szczepan Klimek2, Roberto Zoino2, Kasra Yousefi3, Rajni Sharma1, Angelo M De Marzo1,4,5, George J Netto1, William B Isaacs4,5, Ashley E Ross4, Edward M Schaeffer4, Tamara L Lotan6,5.   

Abstract

Purpose:TP53 missense mutations may help to identify prostate cancer with lethal potential. Here, we preanalytically, analytically, and clinically validated a robust IHC assay to detect subclonal and focal TP53 missense mutations in prostate cancer.Experimental Design: The p53 IHC assay was performed in a CLIA-accredited laboratory on the Ventana Benchmark immunostaining system. p53 protein nuclear accumulation was defined as any p53 nuclear labeling in >10% of tumor cells. Fifty-four formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) cell lines from the NCI-60 panel and 103 FFPE prostate cancer tissues (88 primary adenocarcinomas, 15 metastases) with known TP53 mutation status were studied. DU145 and VCaP xenografts were subjected to varying fixation conditions to investigate the effects of preanalytic variables. Clinical validation was performed in two partially overlapping radical prostatectomy cohorts.
Results: p53 nuclear accumulation by IHC was 100% sensitive for detection of TP53 missense mutations in the NCI-60 panel (25/25 missense mutations correctly identified). Lack of p53 nuclear accumulation was 86% (25/29) specific for absence of TP53 missense mutation. In FFPE prostate tumors, the positive predictive value of p53 nuclear accumulation for underlying missense mutation was 84% (38/45), whereas the negative predictive value was 97% (56/58). In a cohort of men who experienced biochemical recurrence after RP, the multivariable HR for metastasis among cases with p53 nuclear accumulation compared with those without was 2.55 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-5.91).Conclusions: IHC is widely available method to assess for the presence of deleterious and heterogeneous TP53 missense mutations in clinical prostate cancer specimens. Clin Cancer Res; 23(16); 4693-703. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28446506      PMCID: PMC5559307          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  54 in total

1.  Detection of a transformation-related antigen in chemically induced sarcomas and other transformed cells of the mouse.

Authors:  A B DeLeo; G Jay; E Appella; G C Dubois; L W Law; L J Old
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Frequency and characterization of p53 mutations in clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  M C Hall; N M Navone; P Troncoso; A Pollack; G K Zagars; A C von Eschenbach; C J Conti; L W Chung
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Clinical significance of different types of p53 gene alteration in surgically treated prostate cancer.

Authors:  Martina Kluth; Silvia Harasimowicz; Lia Burkhardt; Katharina Grupp; Antje Krohn; Kristina Prien; Jovisa Gjoni; Thomas Haß; Rami Galal; Markus Graefen; Alexander Haese; Ronald Simon; Julia Hühne-Simon; Christina Koop; Jan Korbel; Joachim Weischenfeld; Hartwig Huland; Guido Sauter; Alexander Quaas; Waldemar Wilczak; Maria-Christina Tsourlakis; Sarah Minner; Thorsten Schlomm
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Gain of function mutations in p53.

Authors:  D Dittmer; S Pati; G Zambetti; S Chu; A K Teresky; M Moore; C Finlay; A J Levine
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Genetic markers associated with early cancer-specific mortality following prostatectomy.

Authors:  Wennuan Liu; Chunmei C Xie; Christopher Y Thomas; Seong-Tae Kim; Johan Lindberg; Lars Egevad; Zhong Wang; Zheng Zhang; Jishan Sun; Jielin Sun; Patrick P Koty; A Karim Kader; Scott D Cramer; G Steven Bova; S Lilly Zheng; Henrik Grönberg; William B Isaacs; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  p53 nuclear protein expression is an independent prognostic marker in clinically localized prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  J J Bauer; I A Sesterhenn; K F Mostofi; D G McLeod; S Srivastava; J W Moul
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Increased concentration of an apparently identical cellular protein in cells transformed by either Abelson murine leukemia virus or other transforming agents.

Authors:  V Rotter; M A Boss; D Baltimore
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Increased expression of mutant forms of p53 oncogene in primary lung cancer.

Authors:  R Iggo; K Gatter; J Bartek; D Lane; A L Harris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-03-24       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Copy number analysis indicates monoclonal origin of lethal metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wennuan Liu; Sari Laitinen; Sofia Khan; Mauno Vihinen; Jeanne Kowalski; Guoqiang Yu; Li Chen; Charles M Ewing; Mario A Eisenberger; Michael A Carducci; William G Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Jun Luo; Yue Wang; Jianfeng Xu; William B Isaacs; Tapio Visakorpi; G Steven Bova
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types.

Authors:  Cyriac Kandoth; Michael D McLellan; Fabio Vandin; Kai Ye; Beifang Niu; Charles Lu; Mingchao Xie; Qunyuan Zhang; Joshua F McMichael; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Mark D M Leiserson; Christopher A Miller; John S Welch; Matthew J Walter; Michael C Wendl; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Benjamin J Raphael; Li Ding
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Molecular correlates of intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Huihui Ye; Adam G Sowalsky
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  Is Androgen Deprivation Therapy "Another Deficient Therapy" for Gleason Score 9-10 Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Matthew P Deek; Ryan M Phillips; Michael Haffner; Phuoc T Tran
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  TP53 missense mutation is associated with increased tumor-infiltrating T cells in primary prostate cancer.

Authors:  Harsimar B Kaur; Jiayun Lu; Liana B Guedes; Laneisha Maldonado; Logan Reitz; John R Barber; Angelo M De Marzo; Scott A Tomlins; Karen S Sfanos; Mario Eisenberger; Edward M Schaeffer; Corinne E Joshu; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Telomere lengths differ significantly between small-cell neuroendocrine prostate carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  Christopher M Heaphy; Michael C Haffner; Mindy K Graham; David Lim; Christine Davis; Eva Corey; Jonathan I Epstein; Mario A Eisenberger; Hao Wang; Angelo M De Marzo; Alan K Meeker; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 5.  Genomic and phenotypic heterogeneity in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael C Haffner; Wilbert Zwart; Martine P Roudier; Lawrence D True; William G Nelson; Jonathan I Epstein; Angelo M De Marzo; Peter S Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  DNA damage repair alterations are frequent in prostatic adenocarcinomas with focal pleomorphic giant-cell features.

Authors:  Tamara L Lotan; Harsimar B Kaur; Abdullah M Alharbi; Colin C Pritchard; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Cabazitaxel plus carboplatin for the treatment of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers: a randomised, open-label, phase 1-2 trial.

Authors:  Paul G Corn; Elisabeth I Heath; Amado Zurita; Naveen Ramesh; Lianchun Xiao; Emi Sei; Elsa Li-Ning-Tapia; Shi-Ming Tu; Sumit K Subudhi; Jennifer Wang; Xuemei Wang; Eleni Efstathiou; Timothy C Thompson; Patricia Troncoso; Nicholas Navin; Christopher J Logothetis; Ana M Aparicio
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Transcriptomic Heterogeneity of Androgen Receptor Activity Defines a de novo low AR-Active Subclass in Treatment Naïve Primary Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel E Spratt; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Nick Fishbane; Adam B Weiner; Rohit Mehra; Brandon A Mahal; Jonathan Lehrer; Yang Liu; Shuang G Zhao; Corey Speers; Todd M Morgan; Adam P Dicker; Stephen J Freedland; R Jeffery Karnes; Sheila Weinmann; Elai Davicioni; Ashley E Ross; Robert B Den; Paul L Nguyen; Felix Y Feng; Tamara L Lotan; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  ETS2 is a prostate basal cell marker and is highly expressed in prostate cancers aberrantly expressing p63.

Authors:  Alba Torres; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Elai Davicioni; Anuj Gupta; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Sarah J Wheelan; Jonathan I Epstein; Angelo M De Marzo; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  CDKN1B Deletions are Associated with Metastasis in African American Men with Clinically Localized, Surgically Treated Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Scott A Tomlins; Edward M Schaeffer; Tamara L Lotan; Farzana A Faisal; Sanjana Murali; Harsimar Kaur; Thiago Vidotto; Liana B Guedes; Daniela Correia Salles; Vishal Kothari; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Sumin Han; Daniel H Hovelson; Kevin Hu; Daniel E Spratt; Alexander S Baras
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.