OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the effect of contact force (CF) on atrial lesion size, quality, and transmurality by using a chronic porcine model of radiofrequency ablation. BACKGROUND: CF is a major determinant of ventricular lesion formation, but uncertainty exists regarding the most appropriate CF parameters to safely achieve permanent, transmural lesions in the atria. METHODS: Intercaval linear ablation (30 W, 42°C, 17 ml/min irrigation) was performed in 8 Göttingen minipigs by using a force-sensing catheter with CF >20 g (high force) or <10 g (low force) at alternate ends of the line, separated by an intentional gap. Voltage mapping and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging were performed pre-ablation, immediately after ablation, and at 2 months' post-procedure. Lesions were sectioned orthogonal to the axis of ablation to assess transmurality. RESULTS: Mean CF was 22.6 ± 11.4 g and 7.8 ± 4.0 g in the high and low CF regions. Acute tissue edema was greater with high CF, both caudally (7.0 mm vs. 4.6 mm; p = 0.016) and cranially (6.9 mm vs. 4.6 mm; p = 0.038). There was no difference in chronic lesion size (voltage mapping) or volume (late gadolinium enhancement CMR) between high and low CF regions. There was no difference in scar density (assessed by low-voltage criteria and late gadolinium enhancement signal intensity) or histological transmurality between high and low CF regions. CONCLUSIONS: Although high CF (>20 g) resulted in more acute tissue edema than low CF (<10 g), chronically there was no difference in lesion size, quality, or transmurality. Appropriate CF targets for atrial ablation may be lower than previously thought.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the effect of contact force (CF) on atrial lesion size, quality, and transmurality by using a chronic porcine model of radiofrequency ablation. BACKGROUND: CF is a major determinant of ventricular lesion formation, but uncertainty exists regarding the most appropriate CF parameters to safely achieve permanent, transmural lesions in the atria. METHODS: Intercaval linear ablation (30 W, 42°C, 17 ml/min irrigation) was performed in 8 Göttingen minipigs by using a force-sensing catheter with CF >20 g (high force) or <10 g (low force) at alternate ends of the line, separated by an intentional gap. Voltage mapping and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging were performed pre-ablation, immediately after ablation, and at 2 months' post-procedure. Lesions were sectioned orthogonal to the axis of ablation to assess transmurality. RESULTS: Mean CF was 22.6 ± 11.4 g and 7.8 ± 4.0 g in the high and low CF regions. Acute tissue edema was greater with high CF, both caudally (7.0 mm vs. 4.6 mm; p = 0.016) and cranially (6.9 mm vs. 4.6 mm; p = 0.038). There was no difference in chronic lesion size (voltage mapping) or volume (late gadolinium enhancement CMR) between high and low CF regions. There was no difference in scar density (assessed by low-voltage criteria and late gadolinium enhancement signal intensity) or histological transmurality between high and low CF regions. CONCLUSIONS: Although high CF (>20 g) resulted in more acute tissue edema than low CF (<10 g), chronically there was no difference in lesion size, quality, or transmurality. Appropriate CF targets for atrial ablation may be lower than previously thought.
Authors: Tilman Maurer; Laura Rottner; Hisaki Makimoto; Bruno Reissmann; Christian-H Heeger; Christine Lemes; Thomas Fink; Johannes Riedl; Francesco Santoro; Peter Wohlmuth; Marius Volkmer; Shibu Mathew; Andreas Metzner; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Christian Sohns Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Mark J Mulder; Michiel J B Kemme; Marco J W Götte; Peter M van de Ven; Herbert A Hauer; Giovanni J M Tahapary; Albert C van Rossum; Cornelis P Allaart Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2020-05-22
Authors: Steven E Williams; Catalina Tobon-Gomez; Maria A Zuluaga; Henry Chubb; Constantine Butakoff; Rashed Karim; Elena Ahmed; Oscar Camara; Kawal S Rhode Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Louisa O'Neill; Rashed Karim; Rahul K Mukherjee; John Whitaker; Iain Sim; James Harrison; Orod Razeghi; Steven Niederer; Tevfik Ismail; Matthew Wright; Mark D O'Neill; Steven E Williams Journal: Europace Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 5.214