| Literature DB >> 25068143 |
Luthfun Nesa1, Shirajum Munira1, Shabnam Mollika1, Monirul Islam1, Habibullah Choin1, Aktar Uzzaman Chouduri2, Nazmun Naher3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The study was carried out to assess the analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and CNS depressant activity of the methanolic extract of the Lawsonia inermis barks (MELIB).Entities:
Keywords: Analgesic; Anti-inflammatory; CNS depressant; Carrageenan; Formalin induced pain Methanolic extract of Lawsonia inermis barks; Writhing
Year: 2014 PMID: 25068143 PMCID: PMC4110786
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Phytochemical screening of methanolic extracts of the bark of Lawsonia inermis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here, (+)ve = presence, (-)ve = absence
Effects of the methanolic extract the bark of Lawsonia inermis on acetic acid-induced writhing in mice
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Vehicle | 30.5(±1.136) | |
|
| 10 | 7.75(±1.306) | 74.59 |
|
| 300 | 8.75 (±1.489) | 71.31 |
|
| 500 | 5.25(±1.581) | 82.79 |
Values are mean±SEM, (n = 4);
p<0.05 as compared with vehicle control (one way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s test). Group I animals received vehicle (1% Tween 80 in water), Group II (Standard) received diclofenac sodium 10 mg/kg body weight, Group III and IV were treated with 300 and 500 mg/kg body weight (p.o.) of the methanolic extract of Lawsonia inermis barks, respectively.
Effects of the methanolic extract of the bark of Lawsonia inermis on hindpaw licking in the formalin test in mice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Vehicle | 36.5 ± 1.76 | - | 45.25 ± 1.69 | - |
|
| 10 | 12.25 ± 1.31 | 66.43 | 13.25 ±1.22 | 70.72 |
|
| 300 | 16.25 ± 1.31 | 55.47 | 4.00 ± 1.22 | 91.16 |
|
| 500 | 15.25 ± 1.97 | 58.22 | 2.25±1. 62 | 95.03 |
Values are mean±SEM, (n = 4);
p<0.05 as compared with vehicle control (one way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s test). Group I animals received vehicle (1% Tween 80 in water), Group II (Standard) received diclofenac sodium 10 mg/kg body weight, Group III and IV were treated with 300 and 500 mg/kg body weight (p.o.) of the methanolic extract of Lawsonia inermis barks, respectively.
Effect of methanolic extract of the Lawsonia inermis barks on carrageenan-induced paw edema in mice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Vehicle | 4.6±0.907 | 4.35±0.71 | 4.25±0.56 | 3.78±0.44 | ||||
|
| 10 mg/kg | 2.48±0.454 | 1.9±0.46 | 1.4±0.38 | 0.98±0.31 | 47.06 | 56.32 | 67.06 | 74.17 |
|
| 100 mg/kg | 4.28±0.486 | 2.45±0.56 | 2.2±0.44 | 1.7±0.6 | 8.566 | 43.68 | 48.24 | 54.97 |
|
| 200 mg/kg | 3.88±0.816 | 2.5±0.82 | 2.3±0.77 | 1.43±0.72 | 17.11 | 42.52 | 45.29 | 62.25 |
Probability values (calculated as compared with control using one way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s test):
p<0.05. All values are mean of individual data obtained from four mice (n=4), ± indicates standard error mean, Group III and IV were treated with 300 and 500 mg/kg body weight (p.o.) of the methanolic extract of Lawsonia inermis barks, respectively.
Effect of methanolic extract of the Lawsonia inermis barks on hole cross test in mice
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 10 ml/kg, | 12 ± 1.716 | 16.75± 1.717 | 17.75±1.307 | 17.75± 1.307 | 19.25±1.489 |
|
| 1 mg/kg, | 15.75 ± 1.307 | 5.0± 1.107 | 3.5± 1.136 | 2.75± 0.978 | 2.00 ± 0.904 |
|
| 300 mg/kg | 4.5 ± 1.443 | 3.0±1.495 | 2.25±1.622 | 1.25± 1.376 | - |
|
| 500 mg/kg | 3.00 ± 1.351 | 2.0± 1.0 | 1.5± 1.136 | 0.5±0.760 | - |
Values are mean±SEM, (n = 4),
p<0.05, Dunnet’s test as compared with vehicle control. Group I animals received vehicle (1% Tween 80 in water), Group II received diazepam 1 mg/kg body weight, Group III and Group IV were treated with 300 and 500 mg/kg body weight (p.o.) of the methanolic extract of Lawsonia inermis barks, respectively.
Effect of methanolic extract of the bark of Lawsonia inermis on Open Field test in mice
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 10 ml/kg | 119 ± 1.469 | 115 ± 1.77 | 108.75±2.234 | 98.25±2.305 | 106.25± 1.942 |
|
| 1 mg/kg | 107.25± 2.510 | 72 ± 2.450 | 49.5± 1.908 | 21.25±1.608 | 11.5±1.641 |
|
| 300 mg/kg, | 237.5 ± 5.00 | 108.5± 4.533 | 69.75±5.019 | 30±4.272 | - |
|
| 500 mg/kg, | 160.5± 8.612 | 94.75± 5.659 | 88.75±5.475 | 49±6.026 | - |
Values are mean±SEM, (n = 4),
p<0.05, Dunnet’s test as compared with vehicle control. Group I animals received vehicle (1% Tween 80 in water), Group II received diazepam 1 mg/kg body weight, Group III and Group IV were treated with 300 and 500 mg/kg body weight (p.o.) of the methanolic extract of Lawsonia inermis barks, respectively.