Literature DB >> 29754775

In Situ Gene Therapy via AAV-CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Targeted Gene Regulation.

Ana M Moreno1, Xin Fu2, Jie Zhu2, Dhruva Katrekar1, Yu-Ru V Shih1, John Marlett3, Jessica Cabotaje1, Jasmine Tat1, John Naughton3, Leszek Lisowski4, Shyni Varghese5, Kang Zhang6, Prashant Mali7.   

Abstract

Development of efficacious in vivo delivery platforms for CRISPR-Cas9-based epigenome engineering will be critical to enable the ability to target human diseases without permanent modification of the genome. Toward this, we utilized split-Cas9 systems to develop a modular adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector platform for CRISPR-Cas9 delivery to enable the full spectrum of targeted in situ gene regulation functionalities, demonstrating robust transcriptional repression (up to 80%) and activation (up to 6-fold) of target genes in cell culture and mice. We also applied our platform for targeted in vivo gene-repression-mediated gene therapy for retinitis pigmentosa. Specifically, we engineered targeted repression of Nrl, a master regulator of rod photoreceptor determination, and demonstrated Nrl knockdown mediates in situ reprogramming of rod cells into cone-like cells that are resistant to retinitis pigmentosa-specific mutations, with concomitant prevention of secondary cone loss. Furthermore, we benchmarked our results from Nrl knockdown with those from in vivo Nrl knockout via gene editing. Taken together, our AAV-CRISPR-Cas9 platform for in vivo epigenome engineering enables a robust approach to target disease in a genomically scarless and potentially reversible manner.
Copyright © 2018 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR-Cas9; gene therapy; retinitis pigmentosa

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29754775      PMCID: PMC6035733          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ther        ISSN: 1525-0016            Impact factor:   11.454


  59 in total

Review 1.  Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy: Translational and Clinical Outlook.

Authors:  Melissa A Kotterman; Thomas W Chalberg; David V Schaffer
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Photoreceptor-specific nuclear receptor NR2E3 functions as a transcriptional activator in rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  Hong Cheng; Hemant Khanna; Edwin C T Oh; David Hicks; Kenneth P Mitton; Anand Swaroop
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Reprogramming of adult rod photoreceptors prevents retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Cynthia L Montana; Alexander V Kolesnikov; Susan Q Shen; Connie A Myers; Vladimir J Kefalov; Joseph C Corbo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A nonsense mutation in Gnat1, encoding the alpha subunit of rod transducin, in spontaneous mouse models of retinal dysfunction.

Authors:  Makoto Miyamoto; Masami Aoki; Kazuko Hirai; Shinji Sugimoto; Kazuya Kawasaki; Ryoetsu Imai
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Engineering complex synthetic transcriptional programs with CRISPR RNA scaffolds.

Authors:  Jesse G Zalatan; Michael E Lee; Ricardo Almeida; Luke A Gilbert; Evan H Whitehead; Marie La Russa; Jordan C Tsai; Jonathan S Weissman; John E Dueber; Lei S Qi; Wendell A Lim
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Epigenome editing by a CRISPR-Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers.

Authors:  Isaac B Hilton; Anthony M D'Ippolito; Christopher M Vockley; Pratiksha I Thakore; Gregory E Crawford; Timothy E Reddy; Charles A Gersbach
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Nrl knockdown by AAV-delivered CRISPR/Cas9 prevents retinal degeneration in mice.

Authors:  Wenhan Yu; Suddhasil Mookherjee; Vijender Chaitankar; Suja Hiriyanna; Jung-Woong Kim; Matthew Brooks; Yasaman Ataeijannati; Xun Sun; Lijin Dong; Tiansen Li; Anand Swaroop; Zhijian Wu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system.

Authors:  Woong Y Hwang; Yanfang Fu; Deepak Reyon; Morgan L Maeder; Shengdar Q Tsai; Jeffry D Sander; Randall T Peterson; J-R Joanna Yeh; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  CRISPR RNA-guided activation of endogenous human genes.

Authors:  Morgan L Maeder; Samantha J Linder; Vincent M Cascio; Yanfang Fu; Quan H Ho; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  dCas9-based epigenome editing suggests acquisition of histone methylation is not sufficient for target gene repression.

Authors:  Henriette O'Geen; Chonghua Ren; Charles M Nicolet; Andrew A Perez; Julian Halmai; Victoria M Le; Joel P Mackay; Peggy J Farnham; David J Segal
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 19.160

View more
  46 in total

Review 1.  Live-Animal Epigenome Editing: Convergence of Novel Techniques.

Authors:  J Antonio Gomez; Ulrika Beitnere; David J Segal
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2.  New Editing Tools for Gene Therapy in Inherited Retinal Dystrophies.

Authors:  Juliette Pulman; José-Alain Sahel; Deniz Dalkara
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2022-05-03

Review 3.  CRISPR somatic genome engineering and cancer modeling in the mouse pancreas and liver.

Authors:  Thorsten Kaltenbacher; Jessica Löprich; Roman Maresch; Julia Weber; Sebastian Müller; Rupert Oellinger; Nina Groß; Joscha Griger; Niklas de Andrade Krätzig; Petros Avramopoulos; Deepak Ramanujam; Sabine Brummer; Sebastian A Widholz; Stefanie Bärthel; Chiara Falcomatà; Anja Pfaus; Ahmed Alnatsha; Julia Mayerle; Marc Schmidt-Supprian; Maximilian Reichert; Günter Schneider; Ursula Ehmer; Christian J Braun; Dieter Saur; Stefan Engelhardt; Roland Rad
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 17.021

Review 4.  In vivo epigenome editing and transcriptional modulation using CRISPR technology.

Authors:  Cia-Hin Lau; Yousin Suh
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 5.  AAV Vector Immunogenicity in Humans: A Long Journey to Successful Gene Transfer.

Authors:  Helena Costa Verdera; Klaudia Kuranda; Federico Mingozzi
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 11.454

6.  Single AAV-mediated CRISPR-Nme2Cas9 efficiently reduces mutant hTTR expression in a transgenic mouse model of transthyretin amyloidosis.

Authors:  Jinkun Wen; Tianqi Cao; Jinni Wu; Yuxi Chen; Shengyao Zhi; Yanming Huang; Peilin Zhen; Guanglan Wu; Lars Aagaard; Jianxin Zhong; Puping Liang; Junjiu Huang
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 7.  Emerging strategies for the genetic dissection of gene functions, cell types, and neural circuits in the mammalian brain.

Authors:  Ling Gong; Xue Liu; Jinyun Wu; Miao He
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 8.  CRISPR-Based Synthetic Transcription Factors In Vivo: The Future of Therapeutic Cellular Programming.

Authors:  Matthew Pandelakis; Elizabeth Delgado; Mo R Ebrahimkhani
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 10.304

9.  Long-lasting analgesia via targeted in situ repression of NaV1.7 in mice.

Authors:  Ana M Moreno; Fernando Alemán; Glaucilene F Catroli; Matthew Hunt; Michael Hu; Amir Dailamy; Andrew Pla; Sarah A Woller; Nathan Palmer; Udit Parekh; Daniella McDonald; Amanda J Roberts; Vanessa Goodwill; Ian Dryden; Robert F Hevner; Lauriane Delay; Gilson Gonçalves Dos Santos; Tony L Yaksh; Prashant Mali
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Correcting visual loss by genetics and prosthetics.

Authors:  Kanmin Xue; Robert E MacLaren
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.