Literature DB >> 23892898

CRISPR RNA-guided activation of endogenous human genes.

Morgan L Maeder1, Samantha J Linder, Vincent M Cascio, Yanfang Fu, Quan H Ho, J Keith Joung.   

Abstract

Short guide RNAs (gRNAs) can direct catalytically inactive CRISPR-associated 9 nuclease (dCas9) to repress endogenous genes in bacteria and human cells. Here we show that single or multiple gRNAs can direct dCas9 fused to a VP64 transcriptional activation domain to increase expression of endogenous human genes. This proof-of-principle work shows that clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas systems can target heterologous effector domains to endogenous sites in human cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23892898      PMCID: PMC3794058          DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Methods        ISSN: 1548-7091            Impact factor:   28.547


Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) systems from bacteria[1] have enabled the development of RNA-guided nuclease technology for targeted genome editing[2-7]. The S. pyogenes CRISPR-associated 9 nuclease (hereafter Cas9) can be directed by a ~100 nt single guide RNA (sgRNA) to a target genomic DNA sequence that is complementary to the first 20 nts of the sgRNA and flanked by a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence of the form NGG[4,5]. RNA-mediated recruitment of a catalytically inactive mutant form of Cas9 (referred to as dCas9) can induce repression of endogenous genes in bacterial and human cells[8,9]. In addition, fusions of dCas9 to effector domains have been used to activate reporter genes in E. coli and human cells[9,10] and to repress endogenous genes in human cells[10]. Here we sought to determine whether dCas9-based transcriptional activators could regulate endogenous gene expression in human cells using single and multiple sgRNAs. To do this, we constructed a dCas9-VP64 fusion protein consisting of the synthetic VP64 activation domain[11] linked to the carboxy-terminus of the catalytically inactivated dCas9 protein (Fig. 1a; Online Methods) and tested the ability of this fusion to activate expression of the human VEGFA gene. dCas9-VP64 protein was targeted to specific sites in the genome of human cells using 16 pre-validated sgRNAs (Supplementary Results and Supplementary Table 1) designed to bind sequences within three DNase I hyper-sensitive sites (HSSs) located upstream, downstream or at the VEGFA gene transcription start site (Fig. 1b). 15 of these 16 sgRNAs (designated V1-V16) induced significant increases in VEGFA protein expression when co-expressed with dCas9-VP64 in human 293 cells (Fig. 1c). Expression of a codon optimized dCas9-VP64 did not enhance the level of VEGFA activation observed (Supplementary Fig. 1). Expression of each of the 16 sgRNAs alone, dCas9-VP64 alone, or dCas9-VP64 together with an “off-target” sgRNA designed to bind an EGFP reporter gene sequence all failed to induce elevated VEGFA expression (Fig. 1c). In addition, experiments with a subset of three sgRNAs demonstrate that activation depends on the presence of the VP64 domain in the dCas9-VP64 fusion (Supplementary Results).
Figure 1

RNA-guided activation of endogenous human genes

(a) Schematic depicting recruitment of dCas9-VP64 fusion protein to a specific genomic target sequence by an sgRNA. (b) 16 sgRNAs targeted to the endogenous human VEGFA gene promoter. Red arrows represent the first 20 nts of the sgRNA pointing 5’ to 3’. Grey bars indicate DNaseI hypersensitive sites previously defined in human 293 cells[15], numbered relative to the transcription start site (black arrow). (c) Activation of VEGFA protein expression in 293 cells by various sgRNAs, each expressed with (blue bars) or without (red bars) dCas9-VP64. Asterisks indicate samples that are significantly elevated above the off-target control as determined by a paired, one-sided t-test (n = 3, P < 0.05); error bars represent s.e.m. (d) Six sgRNAs targeted to the endogenous human NTF3 gene promoter represented as in (b) Grey line indicates region of potential open chromatin identified from the ENCODE DNaseI hypersensitivity track on the UCSC genome browser with the thicker part of the bar indicating the first transcribed exon. Numbering shown is relative to the transcription start site (black arrow). (e) Activation of NTF3 gene expression by RNA-guided dCas9-VP64 in 293 cells. Relative expression of NTF3 mRNA is shown for 293 cells co-transfected with the indicated amounts of codon-optimized dCas9-VP64 and NTF3 -targeted sgRNA expression plasmids. Asterisks indicate samples that are significantly greater than the off-target sgRNA control as determined by a paired, one-sided t-test (n = 3, P < 0.05); error bars represent s.e.m.

We next tested whether RNA-guided activators could also induce expression of the human NTF3 gene. To do this, we used six sgRNAs targeted to sequences within a predicted DNase HSS in the human NTF3 promoter and codon-optimized dCas9-VP64 (Fig. 1d; Methods). All six sgRNAs induced significant increases in NTF3 transcript levels (Fig. 1e) with mean levels of activated expression varying over a four-fold range. Experiments with a subset of three sgRNAs showed that activation depends on the VP64 domain (Supplementary Results). Decreasing the amounts of sgRNA and dCas9-VP64 expression plasmids transfected resulted in less activation of the NTF3 gene (Fig. 1e), demonstrating a dose-dependent effect. We envisioned that expression of multiple guide RNAs in a single cell might enable synergistic activation of endogenous gene targets as recently described for TALE-based activators[12,13], thereby enabling combinatorial control of endogenous gene expression over a wide dynamic range. Co-expression of dCas9-VP64 with four sgRNAs (V1, V2, V3 and V4) as well as with subsets of three of these four sgRNAs induced synergistic activation of VEGFA protein expression (i.e.—levels of expression significantly greater than the expected additive effects of individual activators) (Fig. 2a). Similarly, co-expression of dCas9-VP64 with three sgRNAs (N4, N5, and N6) and all possible pairs of these sgRNAs led to large increases in NTF3 expression with three of the four combinations yielding a mean NTF3 mRNA level greater than the expected additive effects of the individual activators (Fig. 2b). Because synergy is mediated by binding of multiple activators to a single promoter, our results strongly suggest that multiple sgRNA/dCas9-VP64 complexes can function efficiently together in a single cell.
Figure 2

Synergistic activation of the endogenous human VEGFA and NTF3 genes by RNA-guided activators

(a) Multiplex sgRNA expression induces synergistic activation of VEGFA protein expression by dCas9-VP64 protein. The calculated sum of mean VEGFA protein expression induced by individual sgRNAs is shown for each combination as green bars. Asterisks indicate all combinations that were found to be significantly greater than the expected sum as determined by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) (n = 3, P < 0.05). Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. (b) Multiplex sgRNA expression induces increased activation of NTF3 mRNA expression by dCas9-VP64 protein. Relative expression of NTF3 mRNA is shown for 293 cells in which the indicated individual or combinations of sgRNAs were co-expressed with dCas9-VP64. The calculated sum of mean NTF3 mRNA expression induced by individual sgRNAs is shown for each combination as green bars. P values were determined by a paired, one-sided T-test (n = 3). Error bars represent standard errors of the mean.

Our experiments define an RNA-guided activator platform that can be easily used to induce expression of endogenous genes in human cells. 21 of 22 sgRNAs tested successfully induced significant gene activation at the VEGFA and NTF3 gene promoters (although these activators showed substantial variability in activity even when targeted to the same locus (Supplementary Discussion)). However, the magnitude of VEGFA and NTF3 gene expression increases induced by our dCas9-VP64 activators generally appeared to be lower than what we previously observed using VP64-based TALE activators at these same endogenous genes.[12] Larger-scale testing will be needed to more definitively determine the relative success rates and potencies of RNA-guided activators and TALE-based activators in human cells. An important priority for future experiments will be to define the extent of off-target effects induced by RNA-guided activators. sgRNA-guided Cas9 nuclease can induce off-target mutations at sites that differ by as many as five positions from the on-target sequence in human cells but bona fide off-target sites can be difficult to predict[14]. However, although nucleases can in principle alter the DNA sequence of any off-target site, a transcriptional activator may not always induce changes in gene expression when it binds to an off-target site. Consistent with this, we note that a recent study found minimal, if any, changes in gene expression changes in human cells (as measured by RNA-Seq) induced by an RNA-guided dCas9-KRAB repression domain fusion[10]. Additional studies will be needed to determine whether this high degree of specificity is a general property of RNA-guided dCas9 fusions. In summary, our results (and those recently reported by others[10]) provide proof-of-principle that heterologous effector domains can be fused to dCas9 without disrupting its ability to complex and function with sgRNAs in mammalian cells. These findings open the door to fusion of dCas9 to other novel effector domains (e.g.--histone modifying enzymes, modifiers of DNA methylation). The simplicity of sgRNA-mediated targeting together with the ability to recruit dCas9 fusions in multiplex fashion should enable important applications of these tools for biological research and synthetic biology.

Online Methods

Construction of sgRNA expression plasmids

Pairs of DNA oligonucleotides encoding the variable 20 nt sgRNA targeting sequences were annealed together to generate short double-strand DNA fragments with 4bp overhangs (Supplementary Table 2). These fragments were ligated into BsmBI-digested plasmid pMLM3636 to yield DNA encoding a chimeric +103 single-chain guide RNA[3,5] under the expression of a human U6 promoter. The pMLM3636 plasmid and its full DNA sequence are available from Addgene (http://www.addgene.org/crispr-cas).

Construction of dCas-VP64 expression plasmids

DNA encoding the Cas9 nuclease harboring inactivating D10A/H840A mutations (dCas9) was amplified by PCR from plasmid pMJ841 (Addgene plasmid #39318) using primers that add a T7 promoter site 5’ to the start codon and a nuclear localization signal at the carboxy-terminal end of the Cas9 coding sequences and cloned into a plasmid containing a CMV promoter as previously described[3] to yield plasmid pMLM3629. Oligonucleotides encoding a triple FLAG epitope were annealed and cloned into XhoI and PstI sites in plasmid pMLM3629 to generate plasmid pMLM3647 expressing dCas9 with a C-terminal flag FLAG tag. DNA sequence encoding a Gly4Ser linker followed by the synthetic VP64 activation domain was introduced downstream of the FLAG-tagged dCas9 in plasmid pMLM3647 to yield plasmid pSL690. The D10A/H840A mutations were also introduced by QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis (Agilent) into plasmid pJDS246, which encodes a FLAG-tagged Cas9 sequence that has been codon optimized for expression in human cells, to yield plasmid pMLM3668. DNA sequence encoding the Gly4Ser linker and the VP64 activation domain were then cloned into pMLM3668 to yield a codon-optimized dCas9-VP64 expression vector named pMLM3705. The full amino acid sequence of the dCas9-VP64 protein is shown in Supplementary Figure 6.

Cell culture and transfection

Human Flp-In T-Rex HEK293 cells were obtained from Life Technologies and cultured and transfected as previously described[12]. Cells were tested every two weeks for mycoplasma contamination. Briefly, all transfections were performed in triplicate using Lipofectamine LTX (Life Technologies). For transfections involving regulation of VEGFA, 160,000 cells were seeded into 24 well plates the day before transfection. 250 ng of plasmid encoding VEGFA-targeted sgRNA, 250 ng of plasmid encoding dCas9-VP64 or recoded dCas9-VP64, and 30 ng pmaxGFP plasmid (Lonza) were co-transfected using 0.5 µl PLUS reagent and 2.65 µl Lipofectamine LTX. For synergy experiments, the amount of each sgRNA was kept constant such that all transfections contained 62.5 ng of each sgRNA and empty U6 promoter plasmid was used to fill up to a total of 250 ng. For transfections involving regulation of NTF3, 350,000 cells were seeded in 12 well plates the day before transfection. 100, 250, or 500 ng of plasmid encoding NTF3-targeted sgRNA, 250ng or 500ng of plasmid encoding codon optimized dCas9-VP64, and 60 ng pmaxGFP plasmid (Lonza) were co-transfected using 1 µl PLUS reagent and 2.1, 2.65, or 5.1 µl Lipofectamine LTX, respectively. For synergy experiments, the amount of each sgRNA was kept constant such that all transfections contained 83.3 ng of each sgRNA and empty U6 promoter plasmid was used to fill up to a total of 500 ng.

Enzyme-Linked Immunoblot Assays of VEGFA protein

Culture medium of Flp-In T-Rex HEK293 cells transfected with plasmids encoding VEGFA-targeted sgRNA and dCas9-VP64 was harvested 40 hours post-transfection and VEGFA protein expression was measured by ELISA as previously described[12].

Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA from Flp-In T-Rex HEK293 cells transfected with plasmids encoding NTF3-targeted sgRNAs and codon-optimized dCas9-VP64 was isolated two days post-transfection using the PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Ambion) and treated with TurboDNA-Free (Ambion) according to manufacturer’s instructions. NTF3 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative RT-PCR using a Taqman assay as previously described[12]
  15 in total

Review 1.  RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Blake Wiedenheft; Samuel H Sternberg; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Regulation of an endogenous locus using a panel of designed zinc finger proteins targeted to accessible chromatin regions. Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor A.

Authors:  P Q Liu; E J Rebar; L Zhang; Q Liu; A C Jamieson; Y Liang; H Qi; P X Li; B Chen; M C Mendel; X Zhong; Y L Lee; S P Eisenberg; S K Spratt; C C Case; A P Wolffe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-01-05       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity.

Authors:  Martin Jinek; Krzysztof Chylinski; Ines Fonfara; Michael Hauer; Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression.

Authors:  Lei S Qi; Matthew H Larson; Luke A Gilbert; Jennifer A Doudna; Jonathan S Weissman; Adam P Arkin; Wendell A Lim
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems.

Authors:  Le Cong; F Ann Ran; David Cox; Shuailiang Lin; Robert Barretto; Naomi Habib; Patrick D Hsu; Xuebing Wu; Wenyan Jiang; Luciano A Marraffini; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9.

Authors:  Prashant Mali; Luhan Yang; Kevin M Esvelt; John Aach; Marc Guell; James E DiCarlo; Julie E Norville; George M Church
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells.

Authors:  Yanfang Fu; Jennifer A Foden; Cyd Khayter; Morgan L Maeder; Deepak Reyon; J Keith Joung; Jeffry D Sander
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Robust, synergistic regulation of human gene expression using TALE activators.

Authors:  Morgan L Maeder; Samantha J Linder; Deepak Reyon; James F Angstman; Yanfang Fu; Jeffry D Sander; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system.

Authors:  Woong Y Hwang; Yanfang Fu; Deepak Reyon; Morgan L Maeder; Shengdar Q Tsai; Jeffry D Sander; Randall T Peterson; J-R Joanna Yeh; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Synergistic and tunable human gene activation by combinations of synthetic transcription factors.

Authors:  Pablo Perez-Pinera; David G Ousterout; Jonathan M Brunger; Alicia M Farin; Katherine A Glass; Farshid Guilak; Gregory E Crawford; Alexander J Hartemink; Charles A Gersbach
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  443 in total

1.  Multiplexing Engineered Receptors for Multiparametric Evaluation of Environmental Ligands.

Authors:  Rachel M Hartfield; Kelly A Schwarz; Joseph J Muldoon; Neda Bagheri; Joshua N Leonard
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.110

Review 2.  CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes.

Authors:  Jeffry D Sander; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Structure and specificity of the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9 during DNA interrogation, target binding and cleavage.

Authors:  Eric A Josephs; D Dewran Kocak; Christopher J Fitzgibbon; Joshua McMenemy; Charles A Gersbach; Piotr E Marszalek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Precision Control of CRISPR-Cas9 Using Small Molecules and Light.

Authors:  Soumyashree A Gangopadhyay; Kurt J Cox; Debasish Manna; Donghyun Lim; Basudeb Maji; Qingxuan Zhou; Amit Choudhary
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nishimasu; F Ann Ran; Patrick D Hsu; Silvana Konermann; Soraya I Shehata; Naoshi Dohmae; Ryuichiro Ishitani; Feng Zhang; Osamu Nureki
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Synthetic biology in mammalian cells: next generation research tools and therapeutics.

Authors:  Florian Lienert; Jason J Lohmueller; Abhishek Garg; Pamela A Silver
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex.

Authors:  Silvana Konermann; Mark D Brigham; Alexandro E Trevino; Julia Joung; Omar O Abudayyeh; Clea Barcena; Patrick D Hsu; Naomi Habib; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Hiroshi Nishimasu; Osamu Nureki; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  CRISPR Knockouts in Ciona Embryos.

Authors:  Shashank Gandhi; Florian Razy-Krajka; Lionel Christiaen; Alberto Stolfi
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 9.  Use of human pluripotent stem cells to study and treat retinopathies.

Authors:  Karim Ben M'Barek; Florian Regent; Christelle Monville
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 5.326

10.  Targeted Epigenetic Remodeling of Endogenous Loci by CRISPR/Cas9-Based Transcriptional Activators Directly Converts Fibroblasts to Neuronal Cells.

Authors:  Joshua B Black; Andrew F Adler; Hong-Gang Wang; Anthony M D'Ippolito; Hunter A Hutchinson; Timothy E Reddy; Geoffrey S Pitt; Kam W Leong; Charles A Gersbach
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 24.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.