Literature DB >> 29754648

The cVAD registry for percutaneous temporary hemodynamic support: A prospective registry of Impella mechanical circulatory support use in high-risk PCI, cardiogenic shock, and decompensated heart failure.

George W Vetrovec1, Mark Anderson2, Theodore Schreiber3, Jeffrey Popma4, William Lombardi5, Brijeshwar Maini6, Jacob Eifer Moller7, Andreas Schäfer8, Simon R Dixon9, Shelley Hall10, E Magnus Ohman11, Catalin Mindrescu12, Jeffrey Moses13, William O'Neill14.   

Abstract

Management of patients requiring temporary, mechanical hemodynamic support during high- risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or in cardiogenic shock is rapidly evolving. With the availability of the Impella 2.5, CP, 5.0, LD, and RP percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices, there is a need for continued surveillance of outcomes. Three factors underline the importance of a registry for these populations. First, large randomized trials of hemodynamic support, involving cardiogenic shock, are challenging to conduct. Second, there is increasing interest in the use of registries to provide "real-world" experience and to allow the flexibility to evaluate individual patient uses and outcomes. Third, current, large databases have not captured the specific impact of mechanical support treatment of cardiogenic shock. The predecessor to the catheter-based ventricular assist devices registry, known as USpella, began in 2009 with paper data acquisition but beginning in 2011 transferred to electronic data capture, enrolling 3,339 patients through 2016. Throughout, registry data have been used to assess the outcomes of Impella therapy, leading to 8 publications and 4 Food and Drug Administration premarket approvals covering multiple indications and Impella devices. Going forward, the registry will continue to assess not only in-hospital outcomes but long-term follow-up to 1 year. In addition, data management will be enhanced to assess quality and clinical experiences. The registry will also provide a mechanism for postmarketing surveillance. This manuscript reviews the ongoing catheter-based ventricular assist devices registry design, management, and contributions of the registry data. The upgraded registry will provide a more robust opportunity to assess acute and late outcomes of current and future device use worldwide. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: The current catheter-based ventricular assist devices registry is an international database documenting outcomes with temporary Impella hemodynamic support. The registry has supported 8 publications and 4 Food and Drug Administration premarket approvals since its inception in 2009. The current registry is more robust containing outcomes up to 1 year postprocedure.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29754648     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  8 in total

Review 1.  Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Kartik S Telukuntla; Jerry D Estep
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar

Review 2.  Management of Anticoagulation with Impella® Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices and Review of New Literature.

Authors:  Luma Succar; Elisabeth M Sulaica; Kevin R Donahue; Matthew A Wanat
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Outcomes of percutaneous temporary biventricular mechanical support: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew P Weber; Thomas J O'Malley; Jae H Choi; Elizabeth J Maynes; Kyle W Prochno; Melissa A Austin; Chelsey T Wood; Sinal Patel; Rohinton J Morris; H Todd Massey; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Influence of Timing and Predicted Risk on Mortality in Impella-Treated Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients.

Authors:  Andreas Schäfer; Nikos Werner; Daniel Burkhoff; Jan-Thorben Sieweke; Andreas Zietzer; Maryna Masyuk; Nanna Louise Junker Udesen; Ralf Westenfeld; Jacob Eifer Møller
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-05-14

5.  Use of Impella heart pump for management of women with peripartum cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Uri Elkayam; Andreas Schäfer; Alaide Chieffo; Alexandra Lansky; Shelley Hall; Zoltan Arany; Cindy Grines
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 6.  Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction-A Review.

Authors:  Sharon Bruoha; Chaim Yosefy; Louay Taha; Danny Dvir; Mony Shuvy; Rami Jubeh; Shemy Carasso; Michael Glikson; Elad Asher
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Mechanical circulatory support for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiogenic shock: Rationale and design of the multicenter, investigator-initiated IMPELLA-PL registry.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Pietrasik; Aleksandra Gasecka; Marek Grygier; Tomasz Pawlowski; Jerzy Sacha; Janusz Kochman
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Complete Revascularisation in Impella-Supported Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients Is Associated With Improved Mortality.

Authors:  Andreas Schäfer; Ralf Westenfeld; Jan-Thorben Sieweke; Andreas Zietzer; Julian Wiora; Giulia Masiero; Carolina Sanchez Martinez; Giuseppe Tarantini; Nikos Werner
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.