Literature DB >> 30877619

Management of Anticoagulation with Impella® Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices and Review of New Literature.

Luma Succar1, Elisabeth M Sulaica2, Kevin R Donahue1, Matthew A Wanat3,4.   

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition that may occur secondary to a variety of cardiac conditions, and may require temporary support with percutaneous ventricular devices like the Impella®. Anticoagulation in patients with Impella® devices can often be complicated due to unpredictable purge flow rates, pre-existing coagulopathy, or heparin allergies. The purpose of this article is to discuss the various options for anticoagulation in the setting of Impella®. The article will also describe recent updates (2014-current) in literature surrounding anticoagulation therapy for Impella® devices. At total of 228 articles were initially obtained through the PubMed search, with inclusion of 6 articles. A total of 51 patients had data in the six studies that were included in the review. Heparin for anticoagulation in the purge solution, at two different dextrose concentrations (5% and 20%), was associated with similar therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time rates, thrombotic and bleeding events. One case series described the use of argatroban in the purge solution for anticoagulation in two patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, without bleeding or thrombotic complications. Pump thrombosis was not reported in any of the six studies. Anticoagulation in the setting of mechanical circulatory support devices is a challenging aspect of critical care. Institutions should have set protocols that clearly define the options for anticoagulation. Future studies that look at longer durations of support and possible operation of the Impella® device with a heparin-free purge solution are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulation; Bleeding; Heparin; Thrombosis; Ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30877619     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-019-01837-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  17 in total

Review 1.  Impella ventricular support in clinical practice: Collaborative viewpoint from a European expert user group.

Authors:  Francesco Burzotta; Carlo Trani; Sagar N Doshi; Jonathan Townend; Robert Jan van Geuns; Patrick Hunziker; Bernhard Schieffer; Konstantinos Karatolios; Jacob Eifer Møller; Flavio L Ribichini; Andreas Schäfer; José P S Henriques
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Developing an Anti-Xa-Based Anticoagulation Protocol for Patients with Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Adam Sieg; B Andrew Mardis; Caitlin R Mardis; Michelle R Huber; James P New; Holly B Meadows; Jennifer L Cook; J Matthew Toole; Walter E Uber
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  Unfractionated Heparin Protocol During Percutaneous Left Ventricular Mechanical Circulatory (Impella) Support.

Authors:  Michelle Christina Lee; Cindy Peters; Neepa Rai; Michael Safani; Gregory S Thomas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 2.457

Review 4.  2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care (Endorsed by the American Heart Association, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiología Intervencionista; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention).

Authors:  Charanjit S Rihal; Srihari S Naidu; Michael M Givertz; Wilson Y Szeto; James A Burke; Navin K Kapur; Morton Kern; Kirk N Garratt; James A Goldstein; Vivian Dimas; Thomas Tu
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Effective anticoagulation for a percutaneous ventricular assist device using a heparin-based purge solution.

Authors:  Douglas L Jennings; Carrie W Nemerovski; James S Kalus
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Evaluation of a pharmacy managed heparin protocol for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients.

Authors:  Kalliopi Fitousis; Robin Klasek; Phillip E Mason; Faisal Masud
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  The cVAD registry for percutaneous temporary hemodynamic support: A prospective registry of Impella mechanical circulatory support use in high-risk PCI, cardiogenic shock, and decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  George W Vetrovec; Mark Anderson; Theodore Schreiber; Jeffrey Popma; William Lombardi; Brijeshwar Maini; Jacob Eifer Moller; Andreas Schäfer; Simon R Dixon; Shelley Hall; E Magnus Ohman; Catalin Mindrescu; Jeffrey Moses; William O'Neill
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Thirty-five day Impella 5.0 support via right axillary side graft cannulation for acute cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Mario A Castillo-Sang; Sunil M Prasad; Jasvindar Singh; Gregory A Ewald; Scott C Silvestry
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug

9.  A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Melchior Seyfarth; Dirk Sibbing; Iris Bauer; Georg Fröhlich; Lorenz Bott-Flügel; Robert Byrne; Josef Dirschinger; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Bleeding Risks in Patients on Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices Receiving Two Different Dextrose Concentrations of Heparinized Purge Solution: A Case Series.

Authors:  Jenna N Dietrich; Hasan Kazmi
Journal:  J Pharm Pract       Date:  2018-02-13
View more
  2 in total

1.  Outcome of Patients Supported by Large Impella Systems After Re-implantation Due to Continued or Recurrent Need of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Yukiharu Sugimura; Sebastian Bauer; Moritz Benjamin Immohr; Arash Mehdiani; Philipp Rellecke; Ralf Westenfeld; Hug Aubin; Udo Boeken; Artur Lichtenberg; Payam Akhyari
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-07

2.  Manual compression versus MANTA device for access management after impella removal on the ICU.

Authors:  Florim Cuculi; Philipp Burkart; Giacomo Cioffi; Federico Moccetti; Mehdi Madanchi; Thomas Seiler; Stefanie Hess; Mathias Wolfrum; Magiliny Jeyarasa; Sonja Meier; Silvia Kuzmiakova; Maani Hakimi; Robert Seelos; Richard Kobza; Stefan Toggweiler; Adrian Attinger-Toller; Matthias Bossard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.