Qiao Lin1, Berthony Deslouches2, Ronald C Montelaro3, Y Peter Di4. 1. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 2. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 3. Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: peterdi@pitt.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Bacterial biofilm-dependent infections (e.g. cystic fibrosis, surgical sites, and medical implants) are associated with enhanced drug-resistance and are thus difficult to eradicate. The goal of this study was to systematically compare three distinct classes of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that include the clinically used antibiotic colistin, the natural AMP LL37, the engineered cationic-AMP WLBU2, and four commonly used antibiotics with different bactericidal mechanisms (tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, and vancomycin) for biofilm prevention properties. METHODS: Using biofilm-prevention assays, we detected bacterial biomass post-attachment in subinhibitory concentrations (1/3 of the minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC]) for each AMP by the crystal violet method, to distinguish the commonly known bactericidal activity from potentially distinct mechanisms of biofilm prevention. Biofilm regulatory gene expression was assessed using RT-qPCR for correlation with biofilm growth inhibition. RESULTS: Commonly used antibiotics at 1x MIC showed modest ESKAPE biofilm prevention while 1/3 MIC of AMPs demonstrated up to 90% biofilm prevention. WLBU2 was generally more effective in preventing bacterial attachment than colistin and LL37. Changes in bacterial biofilm regulatory gene expression were consistent with biofilm prevention. CONCLUSION: The data warrant further exploration of AMPs with optimized structures to fill a knowledge gap on the potential application of AMPs for difficult-to-cure bacterial biofilm-related infections.
OBJECTIVES: Bacterial biofilm-dependent infections (e.g. cystic fibrosis, surgical sites, and medical implants) are associated with enhanced drug-resistance and are thus difficult to eradicate. The goal of this study was to systematically compare three distinct classes of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that include the clinically used antibiotic colistin, the natural AMPLL37, the engineered cationic-AMP WLBU2, and four commonly used antibiotics with different bactericidal mechanisms (tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, and vancomycin) for biofilm prevention properties. METHODS: Using biofilm-prevention assays, we detected bacterial biomass post-attachment in subinhibitory concentrations (1/3 of the minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC]) for each AMP by the crystal violet method, to distinguish the commonly known bactericidal activity from potentially distinct mechanisms of biofilm prevention. Biofilm regulatory gene expression was assessed using RT-qPCR for correlation with biofilm growth inhibition. RESULTS: Commonly used antibiotics at 1x MIC showed modest ESKAPE biofilm prevention while 1/3 MIC of AMPs demonstrated up to 90% biofilm prevention. WLBU2 was generally more effective in preventing bacterial attachment than colistin and LL37. Changes in bacterial biofilm regulatory gene expression were consistent with biofilm prevention. CONCLUSION: The data warrant further exploration of AMPs with optimized structures to fill a knowledge gap on the potential application of AMPs for difficult-to-cure bacterial biofilm-related infections.
Authors: Berthony Deslouches; Shruti M Phadke; Vanja Lazarevic; Michael Cascio; Kazi Islam; Ronald C Montelaro; Timothy A Mietzner Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Shu J Lam; Neil M O'Brien-Simpson; Namfon Pantarat; Adrian Sulistio; Edgar H H Wong; Yu-Yen Chen; Jason C Lenzo; James A Holden; Anton Blencowe; Eric C Reynolds; Greg G Qiao Journal: Nat Microbiol Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 17.745
Authors: Berthony Deslouches; Kazi Islam; Jodi K Craigo; Shruti M Paranjape; Ronald C Montelaro; Timothy A Mietzner Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Berthony Deslouches; Ivan A Gonzalez; Dilhari DeAlmeida; Kazi Islam; Chad Steele; Ronald C Montelaro; Timothy A Mietzner Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2007-07-10 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Bruno Casciaro; Qiao Lin; Sergii Afonin; Maria Rosa Loffredo; Valeria de Turris; Volker Middel; Anne S Ulrich; YuanPu Peter Di; Maria Luisa Mangoni Journal: FEBS J Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 5.542
Authors: Alfonso Santos-Lopez; Melissa J Fritz; Jeffrey B Lombardo; Ansen H P Burr; Victoria A Heinrich; Christopher W Marshall; Vaughn S Cooper Journal: Evol Med Public Health Date: 2022-05-30
Authors: Chino C Cabalteja; Qiao Lin; Thomas W Harmon; Shilpa R Rao; Y Peter Di; W Seth Horne Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 4.634