| Literature DB >> 29751544 |
Iwona Inkielewicz-Stepniak1, Lidia Tajber2, Gavin Behan3, Hongzhou Zhang4, Marek W Radomski5, Carlos Medina6,7, Maria J Santos-Martinez8,9,10.
Abstract
The development of novel oral drug delivery systems is an expanding area of research and both new approaches for improving their efficacy and the investigation of their potential toxicological effect are crucial and should be performed in parallel. Polystyrene nanoparticles (NPs) have been used for the production of diagnostic and therapeutic nanosystems, are widely used in food packaging, and have also served as models for investigating NPs interactions with biological systems. The mucous gel layer that covers the epithelium of the gastrointestinal system is a complex barrier-exchange system that it is mainly constituted by mucin and it constitutes the first physical barrier encountered after ingestion. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of polystyrene NPs on mucin and its potential role during NP⁻cell interactions. For this purpose, we evaluated the interaction of polystyrene NPs with mucin in dispersion by dynamic light scattering and with a deposited layer of mucin using a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation technology. Next, we measured cell viability and the apoptotic state of three enterocyte-like cell lines that differ in their ability to produce mucin, after their exposure to the NPs. Positive charged NPs showed the ability to strongly interact and aggregate mucin in our model. Positive NPs affected cell viability and induced apoptosis in all cell lines independently of their ability of produce mucin.Entities:
Keywords: DLS; QCM-D; cytotoxicity; mucin; nanoparticles; polystyrene
Year: 2018 PMID: 29751544 PMCID: PMC5978101 DOI: 10.3390/ma11050724
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Size of polystyrene nanoparticles
| Polystyrene Nanoparticles | Size (nm)/PdI 1 |
|---|---|
| Amine-modified (-NH2) | 56.93 ± 0.37/0.055 ± 0.007 |
| Carboxyl-modified (-COOH) | 61.35 ± 0.59/0.062 ± 0.008 |
| Unmodified | 63.93 ± 0.48/0.021 ± 0.006 |
1 PdI: Polydispersity index.
Figure 1Hydrodynamic size of polystyrene NPs over time in mucin dispersion at (a) pH 5 and (b) pH 7 measured by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS).
Figure 2Representative traces for frequency f and energy dissipation D recorded by the QSoft sofware at three diferent overtones (fifth, seventh, and ninth). Frequency is represented as a blue line and its values shown in the left axis. Dissipation is represented as a red line and its values are shown in the right axis.
Figure 3Statistical analysis of the interaction of polystyrene NPs with the mucin layer at (a) pH 5 and (b) pH 7 measured by quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation technology. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison post-test. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. control.
Figure 4Effect of polystyrene nanoparticles on (a) LS174T; (b) HT-29; and (c) Caco-2 cell viability. Data are presented as mean ± SD of n ≥ 3. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison post-test. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 vs. control.
Figure 5Effect of polystyrene nanoparticles on Caco-2 visualized by optical microscopy. Caco-2 cells in the (a) abscense and presence of (b) unmodified; (c) -COOH functionalized; and (d) -NH2 functionalized NPs showing the cytotoxic effect of the positively charge NPs.
Figure 6Effect of polystyrene nanoparticles on Caco-2 visualized by helium ion microscopy. Caco-2 cells in the abscense (a) and presence of (b) unmodified; (c) -COOH functionalized and (d) -NH2 functionalized NPs visualized by HIM showing the cytotoxic effect of the positively charge NPs. The lowest micrographs show the interaction of the (e) unmodified and (f) -COOH NPs with the cells at higher magnification and confirm the integrity of the cells.
Figure 7Effect of polystyrene nanoparticles on (a) LS174T; (b) HT-29; and (c) Caco-2 cell apoptosis. Data are presented as mean ± SD of n ≥ 3. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison post-test. *** p < 0.001 vs control.