Literature DB >> 19206551

Cationic polystyrene nanosphere toxicity depends on cell-specific endocytic and mitochondrial injury pathways.

Tian Xia1, Michael Kovochich, Monty Liong, Jeffrey I Zink, Andre E Nel.   

Abstract

The exponential increase in the number of new nanomaterials that are being produced increases the likelihood of adverse biological effects in humans and the environment. In this study we compared the effects of cationic nanoparticles in five different cell lines that represent portal-of-entry or systemic cellular targets for engineered nanoparticles. Although 60 nm NH(2)-labeled polystyrene (PS) nanospheres were highly toxic in macrophage (RAW 264.7) and epithelial (BEAS-2B) cells, human microvascular endothelial (HMEC), hepatoma (HEPA-1), and pheochromocytoma (PC-12) cells were relatively resistant to particle injury. While the death pathway in RAW 264.7 cells involves caspase activation, the cytotoxic response in BEAS-2B cells is more necrotic in nature. Using fluorescent-labeled NH(2)-PS, we followed the routes of particle uptake. Confocal microscopy showed that the cationic particles entered a LAMP-1 positive lysosomal compartment in RAW 264.7 cells from where the particles could escape by lysosomal rupture. A proton pump inhibitor interfered in this pathway. Subsequent deposition of the particles in the cytosol induced an increase in mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake and cell death that could be suppressed by cyclosporin A (CsA). In contrast, NH(2)-PS toxicity in BEAS-2B cells did not involve the LAMP-1 endosomal compartment, stimulation of proton pump activity, or an increase in mitochondrial Ca(2+). Particles were taken up by caveolae, and their toxicity could be disrupted by cholesterol extraction from the surface membrane. Although the particles induced mitochondrial damage and ATP depletion, CsA did not affect cytotoxicity. Cationic particles were taken up into HEPA-1, HMEC, and PC-12 cells, but this did not lead to lysosomal permeabilization, increased Ca(2+) flux, or mitochondrial damage. Taken together, the results of this study demonstrate the importance of cell-specific uptake mechanisms and pathways that could lead to sensitivity or resistance to cationic particle toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19206551     DOI: 10.1021/nn700256c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  158 in total

1.  Preparation of cells for assessing ultrastructural localization of nanoparticles with transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  Amanda M Schrand; John J Schlager; Liming Dai; Saber M Hussain
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Can nanotechnology potentiate photodynamic therapy?

Authors:  Ying-Ying Huang; Sulbha K Sharma; Tianhong Dai; Hoon Chung; Anastasia Yaroslavsky; Maria Garcia-Diaz; Julie Chang; Long Y Chiang; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Nanotechnol Rev       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.848

Review 3.  Intracellular signal modulation by nanomaterials.

Authors:  Salik Hussain; Stavros Garantziotis; Fernando Rodrigues-Lima; Jean-Marie Dupret; Armelle Baeza-Squiban; Sonja Boland
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  A pyruvate decarboxylase-mediated therapeutic strategy for mimicking yeast metabolism in cancer cells.

Authors:  Bronwyn Scott; Jianliang Shen; Sara Nizzero; Kathryn Boom; Stefano Persano; Yu Mi; Xuewu Liu; Yuliang Zhao; Elvin Blanco; Haifa Shen; Mauro Ferrari; Joy Wolfram
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 7.658

5.  Nanotoxicology: nanoparticles reconstruct lipids.

Authors:  Kenneth A Dawson; Anna Salvati; Iseult Lynch
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 6.  Exploiting endocytosis for nanomedicines.

Authors:  Akin Akinc; Giuseppe Battaglia
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 7.  Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface.

Authors:  Andre E Nel; Lutz Mädler; Darrell Velegol; Tian Xia; Eric M V Hoek; Ponisseril Somasundaran; Fred Klaessig; Vince Castranova; Mike Thompson
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 8.  Nanotechnology: toxicologic pathology.

Authors:  Ann F Hubbs; Linda M Sargent; Dale W Porter; Tina M Sager; Bean T Chen; David G Frazer; Vincent Castranova; Krishnan Sriram; Timothy R Nurkiewicz; Steven H Reynolds; Lori A Battelli; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Walter McKinney; Kara L Fluharty; Robert R Mercer
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 1.902

9.  Novel multi-functional europium-doped gadolinium oxide nanoparticle aerosols facilitate the study of deposition in the developing rat lung.

Authors:  Gautom K Das; Donald S Anderson; Chris D Wallis; Sarah A Carratt; Ian M Kennedy; Laura S Van Winkle
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 7.790

10.  Cytotoxicity of surface-functionalized silicon and germanium nanoparticles: the dominant role of surface charges.

Authors:  Sourav Bhattacharjee; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Mani P Singh; Tonya M Atkins; Tapas K Purkait; Zejing Xu; Sarah Regli; Amber Shukaliak; Rhett J Clark; Brian S Mitchell; Gerrit M Alink; Antonius T M Marcelis; Mark J Fink; Jonathan G C Veinot; Susan M Kauzlarich; Han Zuilhof
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 7.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.