| Literature DB >> 29750152 |
Guang-Quan Zhou1,2, Yi Zhang1,2, Ruo-Li Wang3,4, Ping Zhou1,2, Yong-Ping Zheng5, Olga Tarassova6, Anton Arndt6,7, Qiang Chen1,2.
Abstract
Displacement of the myotendinous junction (MTJ) obtained by ultrasound imaging is crucial to quantify the interactive length changes of muscles and tendons for understanding the mechanics and pathological conditions of the muscle-tendon unit during motion. However, the lack of a reliable automatic measurement method restricts its application in human motion analysis. This paper presents an automated measurement of MTJ displacement using prior knowledge on tendinous tissues and MTJ, precluding the influence of nontendinous components on the estimation of MTJ displacement. It is based on the perception of tendinous features from musculoskeletal ultrasound images using Radon transform and thresholding methods, with information about the symmetric measures obtained from phase congruency. The displacement of MTJ is achieved by tracking manually marked points on tendinous tissues with the Lucas-Kanade optical flow algorithm applied over the segmented MTJ region. The performance of this method was evaluated on ultrasound images of the gastrocnemius obtained from 10 healthy subjects (26.0 ± 2.9 years of age). Waveform similarity between the manual and automatic measurements was assessed by calculating the overall similarity with the coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC). In vivo experiments demonstrated that MTJ tracking with the proposed method (CMC = 0.97 ± 0.02) was more consistent with the manual measurements than existing optical flow tracking methods (CMC = 0.79 ± 0.11). This study demonstrated that the proposed method was robust to the interference of nontendinous components, resulting in a more reliable measurement of MTJ displacement, which may facilitate further research and applications related to the architectural change of muscles and tendons.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29750152 PMCID: PMC5884232 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3697835
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Typical ultrasound image of GM MTJ.
Figure 2Flowchart of the proposed tracking algorithm.
Figure 3An example showing the oriented phase map: (a) original musculoskeletal ultrasound image contains MTJ; (b) the oriented phase map of the image.
Figure 4An example of effective MTJ region segmentation from the image shown in Figure 3: (a) the LRT results on the oriented phase map shown in Figure 3(b); (b) the intersection of LRT on the image shown in Figure 3(a); (c) the result of the tendinous region; (d) the effective MTJ region segmentation result. Yellow lines are the lines detected by LRT on the oriented phase map. The circles of yellow and red represent the MTJ identified by the intersections of LRT and manual measurements, respectively.
Figure 5Illustration of the experimental setup during the passive rotation test of the ankle joint.
The CMC values between the manual and automatic methods for the measurement of MTJ displacement.
| Subject | CMC value between manual measurement and automatic measurement by the Lucas-Kanade method | CMC value between manual measurement and automatic measurement by the proposed method |
|---|---|---|
| A | 0.88 | 0.97 |
| B | 0.91 | 0.99 |
| C | 0.57 | 0.94 |
| D | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| E | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| F | 0.95 | 0.96 |
| G | 0.87 | 0.97 |
| H | 0.79 | 0.99 |
| I | 0.70 | 0.94 |
| J | 0.78 | 0.97 |
Figure 6The MTJ displacement obtained with the proposed method, the traditional Lucas-Kanade approach, the LRT with phase map, and the manual method during the passive rotation test of the ankle joint for subject H.
Figure 7The measurement of MTJ displacement for subject H using traditional Lucas-Kanade approach: (a) the MTJ in the 1st frame manually defined with the lines (white line); (b) the measurement of MTJ at frame 275; (c) the measurement of MTJ at frame 764.
Figure 8The measurement of MTJ displacement for subject H using the proposed approach: (a) the MTJ in the 1st frame manually defined with the lines (white line); (b) the measurement of MTJ at frame 275; (c) the measurement of MTJ at frame 764.
Figure 9Bland-Altman plot of the MTJ displacement measured with the proposed method and manual measurements.
Figure 10The displacement of MTJ during the passive rotation test of the ankle joint for subject A: (a) the change of MTJ and ankle angle with time; (b) the cross-correlation between MTJ displacement and ankle angle.