Literature DB >> 33486339

Applying a random projection algorithm to optimize machine learning model for predicting peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer patients using CT images.

Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei1, Morteza Heidari2, Gopichandh Danala2, Sivaramakrishnan Lakshmivarahan3, Bin Zheng2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Non-invasively predicting the risk of cancer metastasis before surgery can play an essential role in determining which patients can benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to investigate and test the advantages of applying a random projection algorithm to develop and optimize a radiomics-based machine learning model to predict peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer patients using a small and imbalanced computed tomography (CT) image dataset.
METHODS: A retrospective dataset involving CT images acquired from 159 patients is assembled, including 121 and 38 cases with and without peritoneal metastasis, respectively. A computer-aided detection scheme is first applied to segment primary gastric tumor volumes and initially compute 315 image features. Then, five gradients boosting machine (GBM) models embedded with five feature selection methods (including random projection algorithm, principal component analysis, least absolute shrinkage, and selection operator, maximum relevance and minimum redundancy, and recursive feature elimination) along with a synthetic minority oversampling technique, are built to predict the risk of peritoneal metastasis. All GBM models are trained and tested using a leave-one-case-out cross-validation method.
RESULTS: Results show that the GBM model embedded with a random projection algorithm yields a significantly higher prediction accuracy (71.2%) than the other four GBM models (p<0.05). The precision, sensitivity, and specificity of this optimal GBM model are 65.78%, 43.10%, and 87.12%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that CT images of the primary gastric tumors contain discriminatory information to predict the risk of peritoneal metastasis, and a random projection algorithm is a promising method to generate optimal feature vector, improving the performance of machine learning based prediction models.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Feature dimensionality reduction; Gastric cancer; Quantitative features; Random projection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33486339      PMCID: PMC7920928          DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.105937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  26 in total

1.  CT-based radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of No.10 lymph nodes metastasis in advanced proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Lili Wang; Jing Gong; Xinming Huang; Guifang Lin; Bin Zheng; Jingming Chen; Jiangao Xie; Ruolan Lin; Qing Duan; Weiwen Lin
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Interactive computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses: computerized selection of visually similar image sets from a reference library.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Claudia Mello-Thoms; Xiao-Hui Wang; Gordon S Abrams; Jules H Sumkin; Denise M Chough; Marie A Ganott; Amy Lu; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  F Coccolini; E Cotte; O Glehen; M Lotti; E Poiasina; F Catena; Y Yonemura; L Ansaloni
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  A prospective multi-institutional validity study to evaluate the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of pathological stage III gastric cancer (JCOG1302A).

Authors:  Takeo Fukagawa; Hitoshi Katai; Junki Mizusawa; Kenichi Nakamura; Takeshi Sano; Masanori Terashima; Seiji Ito; Takaki Yoshikawa; Norimasa Fukushima; Yasuyuki Kawachi; Takahiro Kinoshita; Yutaka Kimura; Hiroshi Yabusaki; Yasunori Nishida; Yoshiaki Iwasaki; Sang-Woong Lee; Takashi Yasuda; Mitsuru Sasako
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Improving lung cancer prognosis assessment by incorporating synthetic minority oversampling technique and score fusion method.

Authors:  Shiju Yan; Wei Qian; Yubao Guan; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Neo-adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy in gastric cancer: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Alberto Biondi; Maria C Lirosi; Domenico D'Ugo; Valeria Fico; Riccardo Ricci; Francesco Santullo; Antonia Rizzuto; Ferdinando Cm Cananzi; Roberto Persiani
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

7.  Correlation between CT based radiomics features and gene expression data in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Jing Gong; Hui-Hong Duan; Li-Jia Wang; Xiao-Dan Ye; Sheng-Dong Nie
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.535

Review 8.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Patrick Granton; Catharina M L Zegers; Robert Gillies; Ronald Boellard; André Dekker; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Optimization of breast mass classification using sequential forward floating selection (SFFS) and a support vector machine (SVM) model.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Mary L McHugh
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.313

View more
  5 in total

1.  Applying a radiomics-based CAD scheme to classify between malignant and benign pancreatic tumors using CT images.

Authors:  Tiancheng Gai; Theresa Thai; Meredith Jones; Javier Jo; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.442

2.  Applying Quantitative Radiographic Image Markers to Predict Clinical Complications After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Gopichandh Danala; Masoom Desai; Bappaditya Ray; Morteza Heidari; Sai Kiran R Maryada; Calin I Prodan; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Machine Learning for Future Subtyping of the Tumor Microenvironment of Gastro-Esophageal Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Sebastian Klein; Dan G Duda
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Design and Development of an Intelligent System for Predicting 5-Year Survival in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Afrash; Mostafa Shanbehzadeh; Hadi Kazemi-Arpanahi
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2022-08-22

5.  Machine learning for lymph node metastasis prediction of in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yilin Li; Fengjiao Xie; Qin Xiong; Honglin Lei; Peimin Feng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 5.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.