Literature DB >> 16621680

Reliable Comet assay measurements for detecting DNA damage induced by ionising radiation and chemicals.

T S Kumaravel1, Awadhesh N Jha.   

Abstract

The alkaline version of the single cell gel electrophoresis assay, popularly known as the Comet assay, is widely used to evaluate the genotoxic potential of chemicals and environmental contaminants, and for environmental monitoring purposes. In recent years, this assay has increasingly been recognized as a potentially valuable tool for regulatory studies. The assay commonly utilises commercially available software programmes to evaluate the extent of DNA damage at the single-cell level. These programmes provide a large number of measurement outcomes (i.e., tail length, %Tail DNA, various measures of tail moment, etc.) to evaluate the extent of DNA migration and DNA damage. At the moment, however, there is no general agreement with respect to the most relevant measurements or parameters to use. This study was carried out to establish which measurement(s) in the Comet assay are most significantly correlated with DNA damage, and should thus be adopted for routine use. Pooled peripheral blood samples from 3 healthy human individuals were irradiated with a range of doses of (137)Cs gamma-radiation (0, 1, 2, 4 and 8 Gy). Following irradiation, the Comet assay was performed according to a standard protocol, and different parameters were recorded by use of Komet 5.0 software (Kinetic Imaging Ltd., Liverpool, UK). Following a correlation analysis, the Olive Tail Moment (OTM), the Tail Extent Moment and the percentage of DNA in the tail (%Tail DNA) gave good correlations that were not significantly different from each other. Further retrospective analysis from other in vitro and in vivo Comet assay experiments with chemical agents also suggested that OTM and %Tail DNA gave good correlation with the dose of genotoxic agents used. Since OTM and %Tail DNA are the most commonly used parameters in many manuscripts, these two could continue to be applied for routine use. However, since OTM is measured in arbitrary units and different image-analysis systems give different values, the %Tail DNA could be considered more meaningful and easy to conceptualise. Other parameters might not be considered of significant use in genotoxicological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16621680     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  68 in total

1.  Cytoprotective effect of hyaluronic acid and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose against DNA damage induced by thimerosal in Chang conjunctival cells.

Authors:  Juan Ye; Huina Zhang; Han Wu; Changjun Wang; Xin Shi; Jiajun Xie; Jinjing He; Jun Yang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Oxidative damage to DNA and single strand break repair capacity: relationship to other measures of oxidative stress in a population cohort.

Authors:  Andrzej R Trzeciak; Joy G Mohanty; Kimberly D Jacob; Janice Barnes; Ngozi Ejiogu; Althaf Lohani; Alan B Zonderman; Joseph M Rifkind; Michele K Evans
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  High molecular weight hyaluronan decreases oxidative DNA damage induced by EDTA in human corneal epithelial cells.

Authors:  J Ye; H Wu; Y Wu; C Wang; H Zhang; X Shi; J Yang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells undergo cellular senescence in response to oxidative stress.

Authors:  Eun Ko; Kyung Yong Lee; Deog Su Hwang
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.272

5.  DNA damage phenotype and prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  O Kosti; L Goldman; D T Saha; R A Orden; A J Pollock; H L Madej; A W Hsing; L W Chu; J H Lynch; R Goldman
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Occurrence and Comparative Toxicity of Haloacetaldehyde Disinfection Byproducts in Drinking Water.

Authors:  Clara H Jeong; Cristina Postigo; Susan D Richardson; Jane Ellen Simmons; Susana Y Kimura; Benito J Mariñas; Damia Barcelo; Pei Liang; Elizabeth D Wagner; Michael J Plewa
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Genotoxic effects of commercial formulations of Chlorpyrifos and Tebuconazole on green algae.

Authors:  Ricardo Santiago Martinez; Walter Darío Di Marzio; María Elena Sáenz
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Low-dose chemotherapeutic drugs induce reactive oxygen species and initiate apoptosis-mediated genomic instability.

Authors:  Renganathan Arun; Sridaran Dhivya; Suresh K Abraham; Kumpati Premkumar
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.524

9.  Quiescent hematopoietic stem cells accumulate DNA damage during aging that is repaired upon entry into cell cycle.

Authors:  Isabel Beerman; Jun Seita; Matthew A Inlay; Irving L Weissman; Derrick J Rossi
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 24.633

10.  A modified alkaline comet assay for measuring DNA repair capacity in human populations.

Authors:  Andrzej R Trzeciak; Janice Barnes; Michele K Evans
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.