Nimita Arora1, Koji Makino1, Dominic Tilden1, Kyriakos Lobotesis2, Peter Mitchell3, John Gillespie4. 1. a THEMA Consulting Pty Ltd , Pyrmont , New South Wales , Australia. 2. b Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , Charing Cross Hospital , London , UK. 3. c University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Victoria , Australia. 4. d Medtronic Australasia Pty Ltd , Macquarie Park , New South Wales , Australia.
Abstract
AIMS: The goal of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from an Australian payer perspective. METHODS: This study used a Markov model that employed a life-time time horizon, modeling patients from symptom onset of stroke until end of life. Clinical efficacy and safety data were taken from an individual patient level data (IPD) meta-analysis of clinical studies. The treatment effect of MT compared to usual care was measured by changes in modified Rankin Score (mRS). Post-treatment mRS scores were used to determine short- and long-term stroke care costs. Treatment costs were modeled, with health state utility values determined by literature review. All analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: In comparison to usual care, MT is associated with higher costs ($10,666 per patient) and additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (0.8281 per patient), resulting in an incremental cost per QALY of $12,880. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the reliability of the base case results across a range of assumptions. The higher cost associated with MT is, to an extent, offset by the cost savings resulting from lower stroke care costs due to improved patient outcomes. The life-time cost savings in terms of stroke care costs are estimated to be more than $8,000 per patient for patients who had received MT in combination with usual care. LIMITATIONS: Stroke care costs based on patient disability/functional level were not available and were derived. As a consequence, long-term care costs for patients with poorer outcomes may be under-estimated. Patient outcomes at 90 days were extrapolated to a lifetime horizon, but this approach was supported by long-term evidence on stroke survival. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical thrombectomy is a cost-effective treatment option for AIS, with clinical benefits translating to short- and long-term cost benefits. This analysis supports rapid update of stroke care pathways to incorporate this therapy as a treatment option.
AIMS: The goal of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from an Australian payer perspective. METHODS: This study used a Markov model that employed a life-time time horizon, modeling patients from symptom onset of stroke until end of life. Clinical efficacy and safety data were taken from an individual patient level data (IPD) meta-analysis of clinical studies. The treatment effect of MT compared to usual care was measured by changes in modified Rankin Score (mRS). Post-treatment mRS scores were used to determine short- and long-term stroke care costs. Treatment costs were modeled, with health state utility values determined by literature review. All analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: In comparison to usual care, MT is associated with higher costs ($10,666 per patient) and additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (0.8281 per patient), resulting in an incremental cost per QALY of $12,880. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the reliability of the base case results across a range of assumptions. The higher cost associated with MT is, to an extent, offset by the cost savings resulting from lower stroke care costs due to improved patient outcomes. The life-time cost savings in terms of stroke care costs are estimated to be more than $8,000 per patient for patients who had received MT in combination with usual care. LIMITATIONS: Stroke care costs based on patient disability/functional level were not available and were derived. As a consequence, long-term care costs for patients with poorer outcomes may be under-estimated. Patient outcomes at 90 days were extrapolated to a lifetime horizon, but this approach was supported by long-term evidence on stroke survival. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical thrombectomy is a cost-effective treatment option for AIS, with clinical benefits translating to short- and long-term cost benefits. This analysis supports rapid update of stroke care pathways to incorporate this therapy as a treatment option.
Authors: Lan Gao; Marj Moodie; Nawaf Yassi; Stephen M Davis; Christopher F Bladin; Karen Smith; Stephen Bernard; Michael Stephenson; Leonid Churilov; Bruce C V Campbell; Henry Zhao Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Johanna Maria Ospel; Ryan McTaggart; Nima Kashani; Marios Psychogios; Mohammed Almekhlafi; Mayank Goyal Journal: Semin Intervent Radiol Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: Lan Gao; Marj Moodie; Ben Freedman; Christina Lam; Hans Tu; Corey Swift; Sze-Ho Ma; Vincent C T Mok; Yi Sui; David Sharpe; Darshan Ghia; Jim Jannes; Stephen Davis; Xinfeng Liu; Bernard Yan Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Lan Gao; Andrew Bivard; Mark Parsons; Neil J Spratt; Christopher Levi; Kenneth Butcher; Timothy Kleinig; Bernard Yan; Qiang Dong; Xin Cheng; Min Lou; Congguo Yin; Chushuang Chen; Peng Wang; Longting Lin; Philip Choi; Ferdinand Miteff; Marj Moodie Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Lan Gao; Elise Tan; Joosup Kim; Christopher F Bladin; Helen M Dewey; Kathleen L Bagot; Dominique A Cadilhac; Marj Moodie Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 4.086