Masaki Ogawa1, Hirohito Kan2, Nobuyuki Arai2, Taro Murai3, Yoshihiko Manabe3, Yusuke Sawada3, Yuta Shibamoto3. 1. Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan. eternal@fj9.so-net.ne.jp. 2. Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan. 3. Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in parameters of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) between benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 43 patients were scanned using a DKI protocol on a 3-T MR scanner. Eligibility criteria were: non-fatty, non-cystic soft tissue or osteolytic tumors; > 2 cm; location in the retroperitoneum, pelvis, leg, or neck; and no prior treatment. They were clinically or histologically diagnosed as benign (n = 27) or malignant (n = 16). In the DKI protocol, diffusion-weighted imaging was performed using four b values (0-2000 s/mm2) and 21 diffusion directions. Mean kurtosis (MK) values were calculated on the MR console. A recently developed software application enabling reliable calculation was used for DKI analysis. RESULTS: MK showed a strong correction with ADCmin (Spearman's rs = 0.95). Both MK and ADCmin values differed between benign and malignant tumors (p < 0.01). For benign and malignant tumors, the mean MK values (± SD) were 0.49 ± 0.17 and 1.14 ± 0.30, respectively, and ADCmin values were 1.54 ± 0.47 and 0.49 ± 0.17 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively. At cutoffs of MK = 0.81 and ADCmin = 0.77 × 10-3 mm2/s, the specificity and sensitivity for diagnosis of malignant tumors were 96.3 and 93.8% for MK and 96.3 and 93.8% for ADCmin, respectively. The areas under the curve were 0.97 and 0.99 for MK and ADCmin, respectively (p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: MK and ADCmin showed high diagnostic accuracy and strong correlation, reflecting the accuracy of MK. However, no clear added value of DKI could be demonstrated in differentiating musculoskeletal tumors.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in parameters of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) between benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 43 patients were scanned using a DKI protocol on a 3-T MR scanner. Eligibility criteria were: non-fatty, non-cystic soft tissue or osteolytic tumors; > 2 cm; location in the retroperitoneum, pelvis, leg, or neck; and no prior treatment. They were clinically or histologically diagnosed as benign (n = 27) or malignant (n = 16). In the DKI protocol, diffusion-weighted imaging was performed using four b values (0-2000 s/mm2) and 21 diffusion directions. Mean kurtosis (MK) values were calculated on the MR console. A recently developed software application enabling reliable calculation was used for DKI analysis. RESULTS: MK showed a strong correction with ADCmin (Spearman's rs = 0.95). Both MK and ADCmin values differed between benign and malignant tumors (p < 0.01). For benign and malignant tumors, the mean MK values (± SD) were 0.49 ± 0.17 and 1.14 ± 0.30, respectively, and ADCmin values were 1.54 ± 0.47 and 0.49 ± 0.17 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively. At cutoffs of MK = 0.81 and ADCmin = 0.77 × 10-3 mm2/s, the specificity and sensitivity for diagnosis of malignant tumors were 96.3 and 93.8% for MK and 96.3 and 93.8% for ADCmin, respectively. The areas under the curve were 0.97 and 0.99 for MK and ADCmin, respectively (p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: MK and ADCmin showed high diagnostic accuracy and strong correlation, reflecting the accuracy of MK. However, no clear added value of DKI could be demonstrated in differentiating musculoskeletal tumors.
Authors: Jiachen Zhuo; Su Xu; Julie L Proctor; Roger J Mullins; Jonathan Z Simon; Gary Fiskum; Rao P Gullapalli Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-07-30 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira; Frederique Gay; Bailiang Chen; Marie Zins; François Sirveaux; Jacques Felblinger; Alain Blum Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: A S Tonoyan; I N Pronin; D I Pitshelauri; L V Shishkina; L M Fadeeva; E L Pogosbekyan; N E Zakharova; E I Shults; N V Khachanova; V N Kornienko; A A Potapov Journal: Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko Date: 2015
Authors: Jing Yuan; David Ka Wai Yeung; Greta S P Mok; Kunwar S Bhatia; Yi-Xiang J Wang; Anil T Ahuja; Ann D King Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 3.240