| Literature DB >> 29738495 |
Yingxiang Liu1, Yun Wang2, Junkao Liu3, Dongmei Xu4, Kai Li5, Xiaobiao Shan6, Jie Deng7.
Abstract
A four-feet walking-type rotary piezoelectric actuator with minute step motion was proposed. The proposed actuator used the rectangular motions of four driving feet to push the rotor step-by-step; this operating principle was different with the previous non-resonant actuators using direct-driving, inertial-driving, and inchworm-type mechanisms. The mechanism of the proposed actuator was discussed in detail. Transient analyses were accomplished by ANSYS software to simulate the motion trajectory of the driving foot and to find the response characteristics. A prototype was manufactured to verify the mechanism and to test the mechanical characteristics. A minimum resolution of 0.095 μrad and a maximum torque of 49 N·mm were achieved by the prototype, and the output speed was varied by changing the driving voltage and working frequency. This work provides a new mechanism for the design of a rotary piezoelectric actuator with minute step motion.Entities:
Keywords: bending motion; four feet walking; rectangular motion; rotary piezoelectric actuator
Year: 2018 PMID: 29738495 PMCID: PMC5982161 DOI: 10.3390/s18051471
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Three-dimensional structure of the piezoelectric actuator.
Figure 2Illustration of the four-feet walking mechanism (expansion view along circumferential direction).
Figure 3The driving signals applied on the proposed actuator.
The parameters of the PZT elements.
| Parameters | Unit | Nomenclature | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Density | kg/m3 |
| 7600 |
| Poisson’s ratio | ×1010 N/m2 |
| 0.32 |
| Elastic modulus |
| 14.3 | |
|
| 7.85 | ||
|
| 7.85 | ||
|
| 11.5 | ||
|
| 2.6 | ||
|
| 2.45 | ||
| Piezoelectric constants | C/m2 |
| −2.4 |
|
| 17.3 | ||
|
| 12.95 | ||
| Relative dielectric constants |
| 765 | |
|
| 640 |
Figure 4The static analysis results. (a) Horizontal bending deformation. (b) Vertical bending deformation.
Figure 5The transient response of the driving foot under step signals with different rise time. (a) Driving signals. (b) The displacement in horizontal direction. (c) The displacement in vertical direction.
Maximum linear accelerations of driving foot under different signals.
| Time Rise Time of Signal (ms) | a (m/s2) |
|---|---|
| 0 | 1555 |
| 0.5 | 123.5 |
| 1 | 68.34 |
| 2 | 30.87 |
| 5 | 12.35 |
Figure 6Motion trajectory of the driving foot.
Figure 7Photo of the prototype.
The step-displacements of the four vibrators.
| Vibrator No. | Step-Displacement (μm) |
|---|---|
| I | 6.27 |
| II | 6.43 |
| III | 6.68 |
| IV | 6.55 |
Figure 8Plot of the output displacement versus the time.
Figure 9Plot of the speed versus the input voltage.
Figure 10Plot of the step-displacement versus the voltage applied to the PZT-H of the vibrators.
Figure 11Plot of the displacement under voltage with step increment of 3 Vp-p.
Figure 12Plot of the speed versus the torque.
Comparisons of several rotary precision actuators.
| Actuator | Mechanism | Structure | Resolution (μrad) | Stroke (μrad) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The proposed actuator | Walking | Clamped transducer | 0.095 | 2π × 106 |
| The actuator by Clark et al. [ | Direct driving | Flexure hinge | 0.075 | 535.8 |
| The actuator by Wang et al. [ | Inertial driving | Flexure hinge | 0.24 | 2π × 106 |
| The actuator by Li et al. [ | Inertial driving | Flexure hinge | 1.54 | 2π × 106 |