| Literature DB >> 29518964 |
Qi Su1, Qiquan Quan2, Jie Deng3, Hongpeng Yu4.
Abstract
Inspired by a way of rowing, a new piezoelectric driving quadruped micro-robot operating in bending-bending hybrid vibration modes was proposed and tested in this work. The robot consisted of a steel base, four steel connecting pins and four similar driving legs, and all legs were bonded by four piezoelectric ceramic plates. The driving principle is discussed, which is based on the hybrid of first order vertical bending and first order horizontal bending vibrations. The bending-bending hybrid vibration modes motivated the driving foot to form an elliptical trajectory in space. The vibrations of four legs were used to provide the driving forces for robot motion. The proposed robot was fabricated and tested according to driving principle. The vibration characteristics and elliptical movements of the driving feet were simulated by FEM method. Experimental tests of vibration characteristics and mechanical output abilities were carried out. The tested resonance frequencies and vibration amplitudes agreed well with the FEM calculated results. The size of robot is 36 mm × 98 mm × 14 mm, its weight is only 49.8 g, but its maximum load capacity achieves 200 g. Furthermore, the robot can achieve a maximum speed of 33.45 mm/s.Entities:
Keywords: bending-bending modes; legged robot; miniaturization; resonant vibration
Year: 2018 PMID: 29518964 PMCID: PMC5876755 DOI: 10.3390/s18030810
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1The structure and exciting method design: (a) The basic structure of micro-robot; (b) The exciting signals.
Figure 2The operating principle: (a) Moving sequence of the driving foot; (b) Linear motion and turning motion.
Figure 3Vibration modes by modal analysis: (a) Vertical bending mode; (b) Horizontal bending mode.
Figure 4The movement trajectory of driving foot in one period.
Figure 5Prototype of the proposed robot.
Figure 6The vibration test results of one leg: (a) Real vibration shape and the corresponding frequency in horizontal direction; (b) Real vibration shape and the corresponding frequency in vertical direction.
Figure 7Movement test of the robot: (a) Linear motion; (b) Turning motion.
Figure 8Plot of the output velocity versus different input frequencies.
Figure 9Plot of the output velocity versus the different input voltages.
Figure 10Plot of the output velocity versus different loads.
The comparison of mentioned robots.
| Authors | Actuation Mechanism | Size | Weight | DOF | Speed | Load Capacity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lim et al. [ | Pneumatic | 70 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm | Not specified | 1 | 50 mm/s | Not specified |
| Erdem et al. [ | Thermal | 30 mm × 10 mm × 0.9 mm | 0.478 g | 3 | Linear:0.25 mm/s. Rotational: | 3.5 g |
| Ishiyama et al. [ | Magnetic | 12 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm | Not specified | Not specified | 22.5 μm/s | Not specified |
| Yan et al. [ | Piezoelectric | 55 mm × 35 mm × 20 mm | 65 g | 3 | 0.24 mm/s | Not specified |
| Son et al. [ | Piezoelectric | 55 mm × 45 mm × 19 mm | 23.25 g | 1 | 58.6 mm/s | Not specified |
| This work | Piezoelectric | 36 mm × 98 mm × 14 mm | 49.8 g | 3 | 33.45 mm/s | 200 g |