| Literature DB >> 29738480 |
Nicholas DiStasio1,2, Stephanie Lehoux3, Ali Khademhosseini4, Maryam Tabrizian5,6.
Abstract
Nanoparticles are uniquely suited for the study and development of potential therapies against atherosclerosis by virtue of their size, fine-tunable properties, and ability to incorporate therapies and/or imaging modalities. Furthermore, nanoparticles can be specifically targeted to the atherosclerotic plaque, evading off-target effects and/or associated cytotoxicity. There has been a wealth of knowledge available concerning the use of nanotechnologies in cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis, in particular in animal models, but with a major focus on imaging agents. In fact, roughly 60% of articles from an initial search for this review included examples of imaging applications of nanoparticles. Thus, this review focuses on experimental therapy interventions applied to and observed in animal models. Particular emphasis is placed on how nanoparticle materials and properties allow researchers to learn a great deal about atherosclerosis. The objective of this review was to provide an update for nanoparticle use in imaging and drug delivery studies and to illustrate how nanoparticles can be used for sensing and modelling, for studying fundamental biological mechanisms, and for the delivery of biotherapeutics such as proteins, peptides, nucleic acids, and even cells all with the goal of attenuating atherosclerosis. Furthermore, the various atherosclerosis processes targeted mainly for imaging studies have been summarized in the hopes of inspiring new and exciting targeted therapeutic and/or imaging strategies.Entities:
Keywords: atherosclerosis; drug delivery; imaging; nanoparticles; targeting; therapeutic delivery
Year: 2018 PMID: 29738480 PMCID: PMC5978131 DOI: 10.3390/ma11050754
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Overall analysis of literature examples chosen for this review. Inset shows percentages of delivered therapeutic in studies for burgeoning field of biotherapeutic delivery with high potential in atherosclerosis research.
Summary of common materials used to fabricate NPs used in atherosclerosis research studies selected for this review.
| Common NP Materials | Drug Delivery | Cell/Gene/Protein Delivery | Imaging |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLA/PLGA | [ | [ | [ |
| Chitosan | [ | [ | [ |
| Hyaluronic Acid | - | - | [ |
| Liposomal Lipids a | [ | [ | [ |
| PLL | [ | - | - |
| Cyclodextrin | [ | - | - |
| PAA | [ | - | - |
| PEG b | [ | [ | - |
| Sebacic Acid | [ | - | - |
| Polystyrene | - | [ | [ |
| α-Elastin | [ | - | - |
| Polypyrrole | - | - | [ |
| Gold | - | [ | [ |
| Synthetic Polymer 7C1 | - | [ | - |
| Perfluorocarbon | - | - | [ |
| PEI | - | [ | - |
| Silicon | - | [ | - |
| Gadolinium | - | [ | [ |
| Iron Oxide | - | [ | [ |
a Typical liposomal lipids include cholesterol, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DSPE), N-[1-(2,3-Dioleoyloxy)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethylammonium (DOTAP), phosphotidylcholine, and those similar. b PEG in this table includes incorporation as a main functional component (i.e., co-polymer) rather than surface coating.
Figure 2Analysis of Table 1 showing importance of the characteristics of certain materials used to fabricate nanoparticles for atherosclerosis research.
A non-exhaustive list of targets recently identified through various NP-mediated targeting of atherosclerosis, mainly for imaging purposes.
| Process | Target | Targeting Moiety | Vehicle | In Vivo Study | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Phosphatidyl serine | Annexin V | SPION | Hyperlipidemic Rabbit | [ |
| USPIO | ApoE−/− mice | [ | |||
| Peptide R826 | USPIO | ApoE−/− mice | [ | ||
| Membrane Potential (ΔΨm) | Triphenyl phosphonium (TPP) cation | HDL-inspired polymer-lipid hybrid NP | Rat | [ | |
|
| αVβ3 | Peptidomimetic antagonist | PFC-lipid NPs | Hyperlipidemic Rabbit | [ |
|
| Ca2+ | Succinate derivatives | IONP | ApoE−/− mice | [ |
| Citrate coating | VSOP | Hyperlipidemic Rabbit | [ | ||
|
| C-C chemokine receptors | 64Cu-labelled vMIP-II | PMMA/PEG core-shell NPs | ApoE−/− mice | [ |
|
| CD44 or Stablin-2 | Hyaluronic Acid (HA) | Hydrophobically modified HA NPs | ApoE−/− mice | [ |
| CD36 | Specific oxidized phospholipids | Gd-entrapped carbon cage within liposome | ApoE−/− mice | [ | |
| p32 | Lyp-1 peptide | HSP-1 self-assembled cage | Arterial ligation surgery in mice | [ | |
| Scavenger receptor SRA-1 | Inherent ability of polymers | PEGylated aliphatic mucic acid derivatives | Rats | [ | |
| Mannose receptor | Mannose | Hydrophobically modified glycol chitosan NPs | ApoE−/− mice | [ | |
| Unknown | Inherent ability of protein cage | Human recombinant protein cage | FVB mice | [ | |
|
| Collagen | EP-3533 peptide | PEGylated HDL-like NPs | Reversa mice | [ |
|
| Elastin | Antibody | PLA NPs | ApoE−/− mice | [ |
|
| E-selectin/VCAM-1 | Antibodies | Commercial polystyrene NPs | ApoE−/− mice | [ |
| P-Selectin/VCAM-1 | Synthetic polymer targeting P-selectin (PAA-sLex) and VCAM-1 antibody | PFC-filled lipid microbubbles | NA | [ | |
| P-selectin | Antibody | PEGylated dextran/IONP | ApoE−/− mice | [ | |
| VCAM-1 | Nano antibody fragment | 18F-labelled antibody | ApoE−/− mice | [ | |
| Peptide R832 | USPIO | ApoE−/− mice | [ | ||
| Peptide VHPKQHR | PFC core w/lipid surfactant | ApoE−/− mice | [ | ||
| Antibody | PFC-filled ultrasound microbubbles | NA | [ | ||
|
| IL-4 receptor | IL-4 analogous peptide | Hydrophobically modified glycol chitosan NPs | Ldlr−/− | [ |
| MRP8/14 (calprotectin) | Antibody | Gadolinium-loaded liposomes | ApoE−/− mice | [ | |
|
| Platelets | RGD Peptide | IONP-loaded PLGA-chitosan core-shell NPs | Sprague-Dawley rats | [ |
| Thrombin | PPACK (Thrombin inhibitor) | PFC core with phospholipid surfactant | ApoE−/− mice | [ |
Figure 3Nanoparticle strategies arising from material properties. (A) Core-shell formulations of PEG, polystyrene, and mucic acid of varying compositions modulate physical properties. Increasing hydrophobic cores mimic modified LDL and can compete with its uptake via scavenger receptors, ultimately reducing macrophage lipid uptake. (*) indicates statistical significance from oxLDL control (p ≤ 0.05). Reproduced (adapted) with permission from [105]; (B) CuS nanoparticles act as infrared thermotransducers to control cationic channels important for atherosclerosis processes. Upon irradiation, CuS NPs targeted to TRPV1 heat up and trigger the cation channel to open, allowing a flood of calcium and activation of autophagy processes, preventing atherosclerosis in the aortic root as well as in the entire aorta. Reproduced (adapted) from [108].
Figure 4Recent examples of nanoparticle biotherapeutics and their targets in preventing atherosclerosis. Insights and techniques gained from siRNA studies has led to the delivery of larger and more complex molecules even up to cells.
Overview of highlights in NP-mediated targeted delivery of biotherapeutics recently used to attenuate atherosclerosis.
| Biotherapeutic Delivered (Target) | NP Targeting Moiety | NP Material | Result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| siRNA (ICAM-1) | in vivo phage display-identified peptide targeting NMHC IIA | B-PEI crosslinked with added disulfide bonds and conjugated to peptide via heterobifunctional PEG | NPs target athero-prone regions and lead to ICAM-1 knock-down | [ |
| siRNA (ICAM-2) | None, but preferentially accumulates in pulmonary ECs | Hydrophobically modified (C13) PEI formed into liposome-like NPs with PEG incorporated | Significant in vitro and in vivo mRNA silencing in endothelial cells for a variety of vascular pathologies, particularly Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC). | [ |
| Ac2-26 peptide from Annexin A1 (N-formyl peptide receptor FPR2/ALX) | Collagen IV-binding peptide | PLGA bioconjugated to PEG and peptide | NPs target athero-prone regions and reduce lesion size, oxidative stress, increase collagen, and enhance athero-protective effects. | [ |
| Interleukin-10 (IL-10 receptor) | Collagen IV-binding peptide | PLGA-PLA copolymer with PEG coating and bioconjugated peptide | NPs target athero-prone regions and reduce lesion size, cap thickness, neutrophil infiltration, and immune cell responses to inflammatory stimuli. | [ |
| Anti-miRNA (miR-712, known association with MMPs) | VCAM-1 targeting peptide | Liposomes formed from cationic lipids, PEG-lipids, and peptide-PEG-lipids | Specific targeting of ECs in vivo under oscillatory/low shear stress leading to decreased plaque size, increased cap size, and decreased destructive enzymatic activity. | [ |
| MiRNA (miR-146a and miR-181b) | E-selectin targeting peptide | PEG-g-PEI:miRNA NPs encapsulated within silicon microparticles | Improved relaxation of vascular endothelium ex vivo, reduced chemotactic ligand expression/monocyte adhesion in addition to lesion/collagen area and macrophage, while increasing SMC migration. | [ |
Figure 5Targeted delivery of biotherapeutics from various nanoparticle formulations. (A) Surgical models of atherosclerosis lead to disturbed blood flow in ligated artery (LCA) vs. non-surgery control normal flow (RCA) resulting in overexpression of VCAM-1 used by targeted lipoparticles delivering miRNA. Targeted liposomes (VHPK-CCL anti-miR-712) resulted in decreased plaque size, collagen content, and other markers of inflammation (* p < 0.05). Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [51]; (B) PEI-mediated delivery of athero-protective miRNA encapsulated in silica microparticles targeting E-selectin reduced overall macrophage content within plaques, marking a reduced inflammatory response. Reprinted (adapted) from [60]; (C) Collagen-IV targeted PLGA NPs encapsulating anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 also localized to the plaque and reduced necrotic core size and generation of ROS. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from Kamaly, N. et al. Targeted Interleukin-10 Nanotherapeutics Developed with a Microfluidic Chip Enhance Resolution of Inflammation in Advanced Atherosclerosis. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 5280–5292. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Figure 6Recent nanoparticle formulations enhancing drug delivery properties in atherosclerosis. (A) Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) are typically formed by lipids in various phases, however, the novel use of nucleolipids allows for added fine-tunability and stability, leading to the ability to encapsulate active principal ingredients (API) such as the platelet inhibitor prostacyclin (PGI2) and imaging modalities (MRI contrast agents). Reprinted (adapted) with permission from Oumzil, K. et al. Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Image-Guided Therapy of Atherosclerosis. Bioconjug Chem 2016, 27, 569–575. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. (B) hydrophobic pockets within β-cyclodextrin (BCD) molecules allow for the encapsulation of potent drugs, such as rapamycin (RAP). The low toxicity and wide range of functionalization possibilities make BCD a promising tool for many studies. Reproduced (adapted) with permission from [56]. (C) Disulfide-linked Poly(l-lysine) (PLL) and heparin, a well-known natural anti-coagulant, form cationic nanoparticles that can adhere to red blood cells and ‘hitch a ride’ to the site of thrombus formation, releasing heparin as the particles degrade. Reproduced (adapted) with permission from [55].
Figure 7Summary of selected nanoparticle strategies capable of intervening at any stage of atherosclerosis. I—Lipid Accumulation NPs passively accumulate as well as lipids because of their size and surface functional chemistries and can even be made to mimic LDL. In addition, they can carry imaging contrast agents, drugs to lower cholesterol levels, and even nucleic acids to genetically regulate expression of cholesterol ester transfer proteins (CETPs). II—Non-resolving inflammation (A) NPs can target inflammatory recruitment receptors with conjugated moieties (peptides, aptamers, antibodies) and enter the plaque to deliver therapeutic nucleic acids, drugs, and/or imaging agents. (B) They can also interfere with macrophage uptake of oxLDL to form foam cells via competitive interaction with scavenger receptors. (C) Passive accumulation in the spleen allows for therapeutic delivery to the progenitor cells and macrophages that would normally egress to populate the plaque. III—Plaque cap destabilization NPs targeting damaged and exposed components of the fibrous cap (collagen/elastin) can deliver therapeutics and/or imaging agents as in panel II. These can lower destructive activity of cytokines and enzymes secreted by macrophages and help to stabilize the cap by inducing an anti-inflammatory environment (T regulatory and helper cells and M2 macrophages) through localized immunomodulation or pro-healing enzymes such as tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). IV—Thrombosis NPs can target receptors expressed on platelets as well as on activated endothelial cells such as P-selectin. These can deliver anti-thrombogenic drugs locally or be used to image thrombus formation via contrast agents. Advanced cholesterol crystals can also be dissolved in an attempt to decrease the dangerous lipids resident in the plaque.