Literature DB >> 16938418

Ultrasound contrast agents: an overview.

David Cosgrove1.   

Abstract

With the introduction of microbubble contrast agents, diagnostic ultrasound has entered a new era that allows the dynamic detection of tissue flow of both the macro and microvasculature. Underpinning this development is the fact that gases are compressible, and thus the microbubbles expand and contract in the alternating pressure waves of the ultrasound beam, while tissue is almost incompressible. Special software using multiple pulse sequences separates these signals from those of tissue and displays them as an overlay or on a split screen. This can be done at low acoustic pressures (MI<0.3) so that the microbubbles are not destroyed and scanning can continue in real time. The clinical roles of contrast enhanced ultrasound scanning are expanding rapidly. They are established in echocardiography to improve endocardial border detection and are being developed for myocardial perfusion. In radiology, the most important application is the liver, especially for focal disease. The approach parallels that of dynamic CT or MRI but ultrasound has the advantages of high spatial and temporal resolution. Thus, small lesions that can be indeterminate on CT can often be studied with ultrasound, and situations where the flow is very rapid (e.g., focal nodular hyperplasia where the first few seconds of arterial perfusion may be critical to making the diagnosis) are readily studied. Microbubbles linger in the extensive sinusoidal space of normal liver for several minutes whereas they wash out rapidly from metastases, which have a low vascular volume and thus appear as filling defects. The method has been shown to be as sensitive as three-phase CT. Microbubbles have clinical uses in many other applications where knowledge of the microcirculation is important (the macrocirculation can usually be assessed adequately using conventional Doppler though there are a few important situations where the signal boost given by microbubbles is useful, e.g., transcranial Doppler for evaluating vasospasm after subarachnoid haemorrhage). An important situation where demonstrating tissue devitalisation is important is in interstitial ablation of focal liver lesions: using microbubble contrast agents at the end of a procedure allows immediate evaluation of the adequacy of the ablation which can be extended if needed; this is much more convenient and cost-saving than moving the patient to CT and perhaps needing an additional ablation session at a later date. Similar considerations suggest that contrast-enhanced ultrasound might have a role in abdominal trauma: injury to the liver, spleen and kidneys can be assessed rapidly and repeatedly if necessary. Its role here alongside dynamic CT remains to be evaluated. Infarcts or ischaemia and regions of abnormal vascularity, especially in malignancies, in the kidneys and spleen seem to be useful and improved detection of the neovascularisation of ovarian carcinomas is promising. Similar benefits in the head-and-neck and in the skin while the demonstration of the neovascularisation of atheromatous plaques and of aggressive joint inflammation offer interesting potentials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16938418     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  81 in total

1.  Tumor radiation response enhancement by acoustical stimulation of the vasculature.

Authors:  Gregory J Czarnota; Raffi Karshafian; Peter N Burns; Shun Wong; Azza Al Mahrouki; Justin W Lee; Amanda Caissie; William Tran; Christina Kim; Melissa Furukawa; Emily Wong; Anoja Giles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound: More than just a fancy Doppler.

Authors:  Rachid M Mohamed; Brian M Yan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-07-16

3.  The role of acoustofluidics in targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Nilanjana Bose; Xunli Zhang; Tapas K Maiti; Suman Chakraborty
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 4.  A review of low-intensity ultrasound for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Andrew K W Wood; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Novel preparation techniques for controlling microbubble uniformity: a comparison.

Authors:  Eleanor Stride; Mohan Edirisinghe
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 6.  Clinical uses of microbubbles in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  David Cosgrove; Chris Harvey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Stability of microbubbles prepared by co-axial electrohydrodynamic atomisation.

Authors:  U Farook; Eleanor Stride; M J Edirisinghe
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 1.733

8.  Ultrasound Contrast Agents in the Study of Kidney Function in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Kambiz Kalantarinia; Mark D Okusa
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Dis Mech       Date:  2007

9.  Mechanically Tunable Hollow Silica Ultrathin Nanoshells for Ultrasound Contrast Agents.

Authors:  A Liberman; J Wang; N Lu; R D Viveros; C A Allen; R F Mattrey; S L Blair; W C Trogler; M J Kim; A C Kummel
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 18.808

Review 10.  Sonography of the small intestine.

Authors:  Kim Nylund; Svein Ødegaard; Trygve Hausken; Geir Folvik; Gülen Arslan Lied; Ivan Viola; Helwig Hauser; Odd-Helge Gilja
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.