Literature DB >> 29737418

Towards a Clinical Trial Protocol to Evaluate Health Information Systems: Evaluation of a Computerized System for Monitoring Tuberculosis from a Patient Perspective in Brazil.

Nathalia Yukie Crepaldi1,2, Inacia Bezerra de Lima3,4, Fernanda Bergamini Vicentine5, Lídia Maria Lourençon Rodrigues5, Tiago Lara Michelin Sanches3, Antonio Ruffino-Netto5, Domingos Alves5,3, Rui Pedro Charters Lopes Rijo3,6,7,8.   

Abstract

Assessment of health information systems consider different aspects of the system itself. They focus or on the professional who will use the software or on its usability or on the software engineering metrics or on financial and managerial issues. The existent approaches are very resources consuming, disconnected, and not standardized. As the software becomes more critical in the health organizations and in patients, becoming used as a medical device or a medicine, there is an urgency to identify tools and methods that can be applied in the development process. The present work is one of the steps of a broader study to identify standardized protocols to evaluate the health information systems as medicines and medical devices are evaluated by clinical trials. The goal of the present work was to evaluate the effect of the introduction of an information system for monitoring tuberculosis treatment (SISTB) in a Brazilian municipality from the patients' perspective. The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems were answered by the patients before and after the SISTB introduction, for comparison. Patients from an outpatient clinic, formed the control group, that is, at this site was not implanted the SISTB. Descriptive statistics and mixed effects model were used for data analysis. Eighty-eight interviews were conducted in the study. The questionnaire's results presented better averages after the system introduction but were not considered statistically significant. Therefore, it was not possible to associate system implantation with improved patient satisfaction. The HIS evaluation need be complete, the technical and managerial evaluation, the safety, the impact on the professionals and direct and/or indirect impact on patients are important. Developing the right tools and methods that can evaluate the software in its entirety, from the beginning of the development cycle with a normalized scale, are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health information system evaluation; Patient relationship management; Patient satisfaction; Tuberculosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29737418     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-018-0968-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  17 in total

Review 1.  Investigating evaluation frameworks for health information systems.

Authors:  Maryati Mohd Yusof; Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou; Ray J Paul; Lampros K Stergioulas
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Impact assessment on patients' satisfaction and healthcare professionals' commitment of software supporting Directly Observed Treatment, Short-course: A protocol proposal.

Authors:  Rui Pedro Charters Lopes Rijo; Nathalia Yukie Crepaldi; Fernanda Bergamini; Lídia Maria Lourençon Rodrigues; Inácia Bezerra de Lima; Gleici da Silva Castro Perdoná; Domingos Alves
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  A literature review for large-scale health information system project planning, implementation and evaluation.

Authors:  Judith Sligo; Robin Gauld; Vaughan Roberts; Luis Villa
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  Patient Perceptions of Electronic Medical Record Use by Faculty and Resident Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Wei Wei Lee; Maria A Alkureishi; Obioma Ukabiala; Laura Ruth Venable; Samantha S Ngooi; Daina D Staisiunas; Kristen E Wroblewski; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  A Qualitative Study of the Barriers and Opportunities for Adoption of Web-Portals for Doctors and Patients in Russia.

Authors:  Georgy Kopanitsa
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Evaluation of electronic health records from viewpoint of patients.

Authors:  Daisuke Koide; Motohiro Asonuma; Keiko Naito; Sumito Igawa; Shiro Shimizu
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2006

Review 7.  Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions.

Authors:  Albert Boonstra; Manda Broekhuis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  [Access to healthcare services for tuberculosis: analysis of patient satisfaction].

Authors:  Pedro Fredemir Palha; Laís Mara Caetano da Silva; Anneliese Domingues Wysocki; Rubia Laine de Paula Andrade; Simone Teresinha Protti; Lúcia Marina Scatena; Tereza Cristina Scatena Villa
Journal:  Rev Esc Enferm USP       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.086

9.  Tuberculosis Control Program and patient satisfaction, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  Margareth Crisóstomo Portela; Sheyla Maria Lemos Lima; Cláudia Brito; Vanja Maria Bessa Ferreira; Claudia Caminha Escosteguy; Maurício Teixeira Leite de Vasconcellos
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.106

10.  Patient satisfaction on tuberculosis treatment service and adherence to treatment in public health facilities of Sidama zone, South Ethiopia.

Authors:  Zekariyas Sahile Nezenega; Yohannes H Michael Gacho; Tadese Ejigu Tafere
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Use of Digital Technology to Enhance Tuberculosis Control: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Yejin Lee; Mario C Raviglione; Antoine Flahault
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  EDDAMAP: efficient data-dependent approach for monitoring asymptomatic patient.

Authors:  Daniel Adu-Gyamfi; Fengli Zhang; Albert Kofi Kwansah Ansah
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.796

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.