Literature DB >> 33970307

Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT for classification of hepatic focal lesions in colorectal cancer patients: its limitations compared to radiologists.

Heejin Bae1, Hansang Lee2, Sungwon Kim1, Kyunghwa Han1, Hyungjin Rhee1, Dong-Kyu Kim1, Hyuk Kwon1, Helen Hong3, Joon Seok Lim4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate diagnostic performance of a radiomics model for classifying hepatic cyst, hemangioma, and metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) from portal-phase abdominopelvic CT images.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 502 CRC patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced liver MRI between January 2005 and December 2010. Portal-phase CT images of training (n = 386) and validation (n = 116) cohorts were used to develop a radiomics model for differentiating three classes of liver lesions. Among multiple handcrafted features, the feature selection was performed using ReliefF method, and random forest classifiers were used to train the selected features. Diagnostic performance of the developed model was compared with that of four radiologists. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on lesion size.
RESULTS: The radiomics model demonstrated significantly lower overall and hemangioma- and metastasis-specific polytomous discrimination index (PDI) (overall, 0.8037; hemangioma-specific, 0.6653; metastasis-specific, 0.8027) than the radiologists (overall, 0.9622-0.9680; hemangioma-specific, 0.9452-0.9630; metastasis-specific, 0.9511-0.9869). For subgroup analysis, the PDI of the radiomics model was different according to the lesion size (< 10 mm, 0.6486; ≥ 10 mm, 0.8264) while that of the radiologists was relatively maintained. For classifying metastasis from benign lesions, the radiomics model showed excellent diagnostic performance, with an accuracy of 84.36% and an AUC of 0.9426.
CONCLUSION: Albeit inferior to the radiologists, the radiomics model achieved substantial diagnostic performance when differentiating hepatic lesions from portal-phase CT images of CRC patients. This model was limited particularly to classifying hemangiomas and subcentimeter lesions. KEY POINTS: • Albeit inferior to the radiologists, the radiomics model could differentiate cyst, hemangioma, and metastasis with substantial diagnostic performance using portal-phase CT images of colorectal cancer patients. • The radiomics model demonstrated limitations especially in classifying hemangiomas and subcentimeter liver lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Colorectal cancer; Liver neoplasms; Multidetector computed tomography; Radiomics

Year:  2021        PMID: 33970307     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07877-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  33 in total

Review 1.  Methodologic Guide for Evaluating Clinical Performance and Effect of Artificial Intelligence Technology for Medical Diagnosis and Prediction.

Authors:  Seong Ho Park; Kyunghwa Han
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sylvain Manfredi; Côme Lepage; Cyril Hatem; Olivier Coatmeur; Jean Faivre; Anne-Marie Bouvier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Promises and challenges for the implementation of computational medical imaging (radiomics) in oncology.

Authors:  E J Limkin; R Sun; L Dercle; E I Zacharaki; C Robert; S Reuzé; A Schernberg; N Paragios; E Deutsch; C Ferté
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  A computer-aided diagnostic system to characterize CT focal liver lesions: design and optimization of a neural network classifier.

Authors:  Miltiades Gletsos; Stavroula G Mougiakakou; George K Matsopoulos; Konstantina S Nikita; Alexandra S Nikita; Dimitrios Kelekis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2003-09

5.  Natural history of patients with untreated liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G Bengtsson; G Carlsson; L Hafström; P E Jönsson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Recurrence and outcomes following hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, and combined resection/ablation for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Eddie K Abdalla; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Lee M Ellis; Vickie Ellis; Raphael Pollock; Kristine R Broglio; Kenneth Hess; Steven A Curley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Critical Review of State of the Art.

Authors:  Robert P Jones; Norihiro Kokudo; Gunnar Folprecht; Yoshihiro Mise; Michiaki Unno; Hassan Z Malik; Stephen W Fenwick; Graeme J Poston
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 11.740

Review 8.  Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: Evolving Paradigms and Future Directions.

Authors:  Luai R Zarour; Sudarshan Anand; Kevin G Billingsley; William H Bisson; Andrea Cercek; Michael F Clarke; Lisa M Coussens; Charles E Gast; Cristina B Geltzeiler; Lissi Hansen; Katherine A Kelley; Charles D Lopez; Shushan R Rana; Rebecca Ruhl; V Liana Tsikitis; Gina M Vaccaro; Melissa H Wong; Skye C Mayo
Journal:  Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-01-20

Review 9.  Reproducibility and Generalizability in Radiomics Modeling: Possible Strategies in Radiologic and Statistical Perspectives.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Seo Young Park; Hwa Jung Kim; Ho Sung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Paul E Kinahan; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Radiomics in precision medicine for gastric cancer: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Qiuying Chen; Lu Zhang; Shuyi Liu; Jingjing You; Luyan Chen; Zhe Jin; Shuixing Zhang; Bin Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 7.034

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.