Anita D Barber1, Martin A Lindquist2, Pamela DeRosse3, Katherine H Karlsgodt4. 1. Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York. Electronic address: abarber@northwell.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) are associated with lower social and occupational functioning, and lower executive function. Emerging evidence also suggests that PLEs reflect neural dysfunction resembling that of psychotic disorders. METHODS: The present study examined dynamic connectivity related to a measure of PLEs derived from the Achenbach Adult Self-Report, in an otherwise-healthy sample of adults from the Human Connectome Project. A total of 76 PLE-endorsing and 153 control participants were included in the final sample. To characterize network dysfunction, dynamic connectivity states were examined across large-scale resting-state networks using dynamic conditional correlation and k-means clustering. RESULTS: Three dynamic states were identified. The PLE-endorsing group spent more time than the control group in state 1, a state reflecting hyperconnectivity within visual regions and hypoconnectivity within the default mode network, and less time in state 2, a state characterized by robust within-network connectivity for all networks and strong default mode network anticorrelations. Within the PLE-endorsing group, worse executive function was associated with more time spent in and more transitions into state 1 and less time spent in and fewer transitions into state 3. CONCLUSIONS: PLEs are associated with altered large-scale brain dynamics, which tip the system away from spending more time in states reflecting more "typical" connectivity patterns toward more time in states reflecting visual hyperconnectivity and default mode hypoconnectivity.
BACKGROUND:Psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) are associated with lower social and occupational functioning, and lower executive function. Emerging evidence also suggests that PLEs reflect neural dysfunction resembling that of psychotic disorders. METHODS: The present study examined dynamic connectivity related to a measure of PLEs derived from the Achenbach Adult Self-Report, in an otherwise-healthy sample of adults from the Human Connectome Project. A total of 76 PLE-endorsing and 153 control participants were included in the final sample. To characterize network dysfunction, dynamic connectivity states were examined across large-scale resting-state networks using dynamic conditional correlation and k-means clustering. RESULTS: Three dynamic states were identified. The PLE-endorsing group spent more time than the control group in state 1, a state reflecting hyperconnectivity within visual regions and hypoconnectivity within the default mode network, and less time in state 2, a state characterized by robust within-network connectivity for all networks and strong default mode network anticorrelations. Within the PLE-endorsing group, worse executive function was associated with more time spent in and more transitions into state 1 and less time spent in and fewer transitions into state 3. CONCLUSIONS: PLEs are associated with altered large-scale brain dynamics, which tip the system away from spending more time in states reflecting more "typical" connectivity patterns toward more time in states reflecting visual hyperconnectivity and default mode hypoconnectivity.
Authors: Julia M Sheffield; Sridhar Kandala; Gregory C Burgess; Michael P Harms; Deanna M Barch Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2016-11
Authors: Ann S Choe; Mary Beth Nebel; Anita D Barber; Jessica R Cohen; Yuting Xu; James J Pekar; Brian Caffo; Martin A Lindquist Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: David C Van Essen; Stephen M Smith; Deanna M Barch; Timothy E J Behrens; Essa Yacoub; Kamil Ugurbil Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Katherine H Karlsgodt; Theo G M van Erp; Russell A Poldrack; Carrie E Bearden; Keith H Nuechterlein; Tyrone D Cannon Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-08-27 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Katherine H Karlsgodt; Jacqueline Sanz; Theo G M van Erp; Carrie E Bearden; Keith H Nuechterlein; Tyrone D Cannon Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: André Schmidt; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Renata Smieskova; Fabienne Harrisberger; Undine E Lang; Philip McGuire; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Stefan Borgwardt Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Mustafa S Cetin; Jon M Houck; Barnaly Rashid; Oktay Agacoglu; Julia M Stephen; Jing Sui; Jose Canive; Andy Mayer; Cheryl Aine; Juan R Bustillo; Vince D Calhoun Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: T D Satterthwaite; S N Vandekar; D H Wolf; D S Bassett; K Ruparel; Z Shehzad; R C Craddock; R T Shinohara; T M Moore; E D Gennatas; C Jackson; D R Roalf; M P Milham; M E Calkins; H Hakonarson; R C Gur; R E Gur Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Matthew F Glasser; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; J Anthony Wilson; Timothy S Coalson; Bruce Fischl; Jesper L Andersson; Junqian Xu; Saad Jbabdi; Matthew Webster; Jonathan R Polimeni; David C Van Essen; Mark Jenkinson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-05-11 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Md Abdur Rahaman; Eswar Damaraju; Jessica A Turner; Theo G M van Erp; Daniel Mathalon; Jatin Vaidya; Bryon Muller; Godfrey Pearlson; Vince D Calhoun Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2021-07-30