Literature DB >> 28687517

Comparing test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity methods.

Ann S Choe1, Mary Beth Nebel2, Anita D Barber3, Jessica R Cohen4, Yuting Xu5, James J Pekar1, Brian Caffo5, Martin A Lindquist6.   

Abstract

Due to the dynamic, condition-dependent nature of brain activity, interest in estimating rapid functional connectivity (FC) changes that occur during resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) has recently soared. However, studying dynamic FC is methodologically challenging, due to the low signal-to-noise ratio of the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal in fMRI and the massive number of data points generated during the analysis. Thus, it is important to establish methods and summary measures that maximize reliability and the utility of dynamic FC to provide insight into brain function. In this study, we investigated the reliability of dynamic FC summary measures derived using three commonly used estimation methods - sliding window (SW), tapered sliding window (TSW), and dynamic conditional correlations (DCC) methods. We applied each of these techniques to two publicly available rs-fMRI test-retest data sets - the Multi-Modal MRI Reproducibility Resource (Kirby Data) and the Human Connectome Project (HCP Data). The reliability of two categories of dynamic FC summary measures were assessed, specifically basic summary statistics of the dynamic correlations and summary measures derived from recurring whole-brain patterns of FC ("brain states"). The results provide evidence that dynamic correlations are reliably detected in both test-retest data sets, and the DCC method outperforms SW methods in terms of the reliability of summary statistics. However, across all estimation methods, reliability of the brain state-derived measures was low. Notably, the results also show that the DCC-derived dynamic correlation variances are significantly more reliable than those derived using the non-parametric estimation methods. This is important, as the fluctuations of dynamic FC (i.e., its variance) has a strong potential to provide summary measures that can be used to find meaningful individual differences in dynamic FC. We therefore conclude that utilizing the variance of the dynamic connectivity is an important component in any dynamic FC-derived summary measure.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28687517      PMCID: PMC5614828          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  67 in total

1.  Emergence of system roles in normative neurodevelopment.

Authors:  Shi Gu; Theodore D Satterthwaite; John D Medaglia; Muzhi Yang; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Echo-planar imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in a fraction of a second.

Authors:  M K Stehling; R Turner; P Mansfield
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Changes in structural and functional connectivity among resting-state networks across the human lifespan.

Authors:  Richard F Betzel; Lisa Byrge; Ye He; Joaquín Goñi; Xi-Nian Zuo; Olaf Sporns
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest.

Authors:  Nora Leonardi; Dimitri Van De Ville
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain.

Authors:  Timothy O Laumann; Evan M Gordon; Babatunde Adeyemo; Abraham Z Snyder; Sung Jun Joo; Mei-Yen Chen; Adrian W Gilmore; Kathleen B McDermott; Steven M Nelson; Nico U F Dosenbach; Bradley L Schlaggar; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview.

Authors:  David C Van Essen; Stephen M Smith; Deanna M Barch; Timothy E J Behrens; Essa Yacoub; Kamil Ugurbil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Periodic changes in fMRI connectivity.

Authors:  Daniel A Handwerker; Vinai Roopchansingh; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers.

Authors:  Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi; Gwenaëlle Douaud; Christian F Beckmann; Matthew F Glasser; Ludovica Griffanti; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project.

Authors:  Matthew F Glasser; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; J Anthony Wilson; Timothy S Coalson; Bruce Fischl; Jesper L Andersson; Junqian Xu; Saad Jbabdi; Matthew Webster; Jonathan R Polimeni; David C Van Essen; Mark Jenkinson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  56 in total

1.  Dynamic Functional Connectivity States Reflecting Psychotic-like Experiences.

Authors:  Anita D Barber; Martin A Lindquist; Pamela DeRosse; Katherine H Karlsgodt
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-09-28

Review 2.  The behavioral and cognitive relevance of time-varying, dynamic changes in functional connectivity.

Authors:  Jessica R Cohen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Investigating the impact of autocorrelation on time-varying connectivity.

Authors:  Hamed Honari; Ann S Choe; James J Pekar; Martin A Lindquist
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Time-Resolved Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis: Current Status, Challenges, and New Directions.

Authors:  Shella Keilholz; Cesar Caballero-Gaudes; Peter Bandettini; Gustavo Deco; Vince Calhoun
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2017-10

Review 5.  Applications of dynamic functional connectivity to pain and its modulation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Necka; In-Seon Lee; Aaron Kucyi; Joshua C Cheng; Qingbao Yu; Lauren Y Atlas
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-08-07

6.  Improved state change estimation in dynamic functional connectivity using hidden semi-Markov models.

Authors:  Heather Shappell; Brian S Caffo; James J Pekar; Martin A Lindquist
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Improved estimation of subject-level functional connectivity using full and partial correlation with empirical Bayes shrinkage.

Authors:  Amanda F Mejia; Mary Beth Nebel; Anita D Barber; Ann S Choe; James J Pekar; Brian S Caffo; Martin A Lindquist
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Integrative Bayesian analysis of brain functional networks incorporating anatomical knowledge.

Authors:  Ixavier A Higgins; Suprateek Kundu; Ying Guo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Statistical model for dynamically-changing correlation matrices with application to brain connectivity.

Authors:  Shih-Gu Huang; S Balqis Samdin; Chee-Ming Ting; Hernando Ombao; Moo K Chung
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Connectivity dynamics from wakefulness to sleep.

Authors:  Eswar Damaraju; Enzo Tagliazucchi; Helmut Laufs; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.